12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m“No chastening for <strong>the</strong> present seemeth <strong>to</strong> be joyous, 3394 but grievous, 3395 never<strong>the</strong>less, afterwardit yieldeth <strong>the</strong> peaceable fruit <strong>of</strong> righteousness un<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m which are 3396 exercised <strong>the</strong>reby.Wherefore lift up <strong>the</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s which hang down, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> feeble knees: <strong>and</strong> make straight pathsfor your feet, lest that which is lame be turned out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> way, but let it ra<strong>the</strong>r be healed.”[1.] They who drink bitter medicines, first submit <strong>to</strong> some unpleasantness, <strong>and</strong> afterwards feel<strong>the</strong> benefit. For such is virtue, such is vice. In <strong>the</strong> latter <strong>the</strong>re is first <strong>the</strong> pleasure, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>desp<strong>on</strong>dency: in <strong>the</strong> former first <strong>the</strong> desp<strong>on</strong>dency, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> pleasure. But <strong>the</strong>re is no equality;for it is not <strong>the</strong> same, <strong>to</strong> be first grieved <strong>and</strong> afterwards pleased, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> be first pleased <strong>and</strong> afterwardsgrieved. How so? because in <strong>the</strong> latter case <strong>the</strong> expectati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> coming desp<strong>on</strong>dency makes <strong>the</strong>present pleasure less: but in <strong>the</strong> former <strong>the</strong> expectati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> coming pleasure cuts away <strong>the</strong> violence<strong>of</strong> present desp<strong>on</strong>dency; so that <strong>the</strong> result is that in <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e instance we never have pleasure, in <strong>the</strong>latter we never have grief. And <strong>the</strong> difference does not lie in this <strong>on</strong>ly, but also in o<strong>the</strong>r ways. Ashow? That <strong>the</strong> durati<strong>on</strong> is not equal, but far greater <strong>and</strong> more ample. And here <strong>to</strong>o, it is still moreso in things spiritual.From this [c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>] <strong>the</strong>n Paul undertakes <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sole <strong>the</strong>m; <strong>and</strong> again takes up <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong>judgment <strong>of</strong> men, which no <strong>on</strong>e is able <strong>to</strong> st<strong>and</strong> against, nor <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>tend with <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> decisi<strong>on</strong>,when <strong>on</strong>e says what is acknowledged by all.Ye are suffering, he says. For such is chastisement; such is its beginning. For “no chasteningfor <strong>the</strong> present seemeth <strong>to</strong> be joyous but grievous.” Well said he, “seemeth not.” Chastisement hemeans is not grievous but “seemeth” so. “All chastisement”: not this <strong>and</strong> that, but “all,” both human<strong>and</strong> spiritual. Seest thou that he argues from our comm<strong>on</strong> noti<strong>on</strong>s? “Seemeth” (he says) “<strong>to</strong> begrievous,” so that it is not [really so]. For what sort <strong>of</strong> grief brings forth joy? So nei<strong>the</strong>r doespleasure bring forth desp<strong>on</strong>dency.“Never<strong>the</strong>less, afterward it yieldeth <strong>the</strong> peaceable fruits <strong>of</strong> righteousness <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m which havebeen exercised <strong>the</strong>reby.” Not “fruit” but “fruits,” 3397 a great abundance.“To <strong>the</strong>m” (he says) “which have been exercised <strong>the</strong>reby.” What is “<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m which have beenexercised <strong>the</strong>reby”? To <strong>the</strong>m that have endured for a l<strong>on</strong>g while, <strong>and</strong> been patient. And he uses anauspicious 3398 expressi<strong>on</strong>. So <strong>the</strong>n, chastisement is exercise, making <strong>the</strong> athlete str<strong>on</strong>g, <strong>and</strong> invinciblein combats, irresistible in wars.If <strong>the</strong>n “all chastisement” be such, this also will be such: so that we ought <strong>to</strong> look for goodthings, <strong>and</strong> for a sweet <strong>and</strong> peaceful end. And do not w<strong>on</strong>der if, being itself hard, it has sweet fruits;since in trees also <strong>the</strong> bark is almost destitute <strong>of</strong> all quality, 3399 <strong>and</strong> rough; but <strong>the</strong> fruits are sweet.But he <strong>to</strong>ok it from <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> noti<strong>on</strong>. If <strong>the</strong>refore we ought <strong>to</strong> look for such things, why do yevex yourselves? Why, after ye have endured <strong>the</strong> painful, do ye desp<strong>on</strong>d as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> good? Thedistasteful things which ye had <strong>to</strong> endure, ye endured: do not <strong>the</strong>n desp<strong>on</strong>d as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> recompense.3394“ <strong>of</strong> joy. ”3395“ <strong>of</strong> grief. ”3396[The Revisi<strong>on</strong> has here correctly “ have been exercised, ” <strong>and</strong> it is so commented up<strong>on</strong> by <strong>St</strong>. Chrys. below.—F.G.]3397καρπούς . [At <strong>the</strong> head <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> homily <strong>the</strong> word is in <strong>the</strong> singular, as in <strong>the</strong> text <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>; it is here commented up<strong>on</strong>as if in <strong>the</strong> plural.—F.G.]3398εὐφήμῳ3399ἄ ποιος729

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!