12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m476<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, so we might say “<strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> Abraham.” But you do not know how great a dignitythis is, because we do not attain <strong>to</strong> it. For as now He is called <strong>the</strong> Lord <strong>of</strong> all Christians, <strong>and</strong> yet<strong>the</strong> name goes bey<strong>on</strong>d our deserts: c<strong>on</strong>sider <strong>the</strong> greatness if He were called <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e [pers<strong>on</strong>]!He who is called <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole world is “not ashamed <strong>to</strong> be called” <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> three men:<strong>and</strong> with good reas<strong>on</strong>: for <strong>the</strong> saints would turn <strong>the</strong> scale, I do not say against <strong>the</strong> world 3258 butagainst ten thous<strong>and</strong> such. “For <strong>on</strong>e man who doeth <strong>the</strong> will <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord, 3259 is better than tenthous<strong>and</strong> transgressors.” ( Ecclus. xvi. 3 .)Now that <strong>the</strong>y called <strong>the</strong>mselves “strangers” in this sense is manifest. But supposing that <strong>the</strong>ysaid <strong>the</strong>y were “strangers” <strong>on</strong> account <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> strange l<strong>and</strong>, why did David also [call himself astranger]? Was not he a king? Was not he a prophet? Did he not spend his life in his own country?Why <strong>the</strong>n does he say, “I am a stranger <strong>and</strong> a sojourner”? ( Ps. xxxix. 12 .) How art thou a stranger?“As” (he says) “all my fa<strong>the</strong>rs were.” Seest thou that <strong>the</strong>y <strong>to</strong>o were strangers? We have a country,he means, but not really our country. But how art thou thyself a stranger? As <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth. Therefore<strong>the</strong>y also [were strangers] in respect <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth: For “as <strong>the</strong>y were,” he says, so also am I; <strong>and</strong> ashe, so <strong>the</strong>y <strong>to</strong>o.[7.] Let us even now become strangers; that God may “not be ashamed <strong>of</strong> us <strong>to</strong> be called ourGod.” For it is a shame <strong>to</strong> Him, when He is called <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> wicked, <strong>and</strong> He also is ashamed<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m; as He is glorified when He is [called <strong>the</strong> God] <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> good <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> kind, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m thatcultivate virtue. For if “we” decline <strong>to</strong> be called <strong>the</strong> masters <strong>of</strong> our wicked slaves, <strong>and</strong> give <strong>the</strong>mup; <strong>and</strong> should any <strong>on</strong>e come <strong>to</strong> us <strong>and</strong> say, ‘such a <strong>on</strong>e does innumerable bad things, he is yourslave, is he not?’ We immediately say, “by no means,” <strong>to</strong> get rid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disgrace: for a slave has aclose relati<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> his master, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> discredit passes from <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>e <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. 3260 —But <strong>the</strong>y wereso illustrious, so full <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>fidence, that not <strong>on</strong>ly was He “not ashamed <strong>to</strong> be called” from <strong>the</strong>m,but He even Himself says, “I am <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> Abraham, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> Isaac, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> God <strong>of</strong> Jacob.”( Ex. iii. 6 .)Let us also, my beloved, become “strangers”; that God may “not be ashamed <strong>of</strong> us”; that Hemay not be ashamed, <strong>and</strong> deliver us up <strong>to</strong> Hell. Such were <strong>the</strong>y who said, “Lord, have we notprophesied in Thy Name, <strong>and</strong> in Thy Name have d<strong>on</strong>e many w<strong>on</strong>derful works!” ( Matt. vii. 22 .)But see what Christ says <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m: “I know you not:” <strong>the</strong> very thing which masters would do, whenwicked slaves run <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, wishing <strong>to</strong> be rid <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> disgrace. “I know you not,” He says. How <strong>the</strong>ndost Thou punish those whom Thou knowest not? I said, “I know not,” in a different sense: that is,“I deny you, <strong>and</strong> renounce you.” But God forbid that we should hear this fatal <strong>and</strong> terrible utterance.For if <strong>the</strong>y who cast out dem<strong>on</strong>s <strong>and</strong> prophesied, were denied, because <strong>the</strong>ir life was not suitable<strong>the</strong>re<strong>to</strong>; how much more we![8.] And how (you ask) is it possible that <strong>the</strong>y should be denied, who have shown propheticpowers, <strong>and</strong> wrought miracles, <strong>and</strong> cast out dem<strong>on</strong>s? Is it probable <strong>the</strong>y were afterwards changed,<strong>and</strong> became wicked; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore were nothing benefited, even by <strong>the</strong>ir former virtue. For not<strong>on</strong>ly ought we <strong>to</strong> have our beginnings splendid, but <strong>the</strong> end also more splendid still.3258See <strong>on</strong> ver. 36, pp. 488 sqq.3259Mr. Field observes that <strong>St</strong>. Chrys. repeatedly cites Ecclus. xvi. 3 , thus; <strong>and</strong> that while <strong>the</strong> Greek is simply, “ or <strong>on</strong>e isbetter than a thous<strong>and</strong>, ” <strong>the</strong> Syriac seems <strong>to</strong> have read ὅ τι κρείσσων εἱς ποιῶν θέλημα , &c. So <strong>the</strong> English versi<strong>on</strong> has “ for<strong>on</strong>e that is just . ”3260The sentence is left incomplete: The comm<strong>on</strong> editi<strong>on</strong>s add, “ much more does God. ”689

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!