12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m449Sacrifice, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fering, <strong>and</strong> burnt-<strong>of</strong>ferings, <strong>and</strong> [<strong>of</strong>fering] for sin Thou wouldest not, nei<strong>the</strong>r hadstpleasure <strong>the</strong>rein, which are <strong>of</strong>fered by <strong>the</strong> Law, <strong>the</strong>n He said, Lo! I come <strong>to</strong> do Thy will, O God!He taketh away <strong>the</strong> first that He may establish <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d.”Thou seest again <strong>the</strong> superabundance [<strong>of</strong> his pro<strong>of</strong>s]? This sacrifice (he says) is <strong>on</strong>e; whereas<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs were many: <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y had no strength, because <strong>the</strong>y were many. For, tell me, whatneed <strong>of</strong> many, if <strong>on</strong>e had been sufficient? so that <strong>the</strong>ir being many, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fered “c<strong>on</strong>tinually,”proves that <strong>the</strong>y [<strong>the</strong> worshipers] were never made clean. For as a medicine, when it is powerful<strong>and</strong> productive <strong>of</strong> health, <strong>and</strong> able <strong>to</strong> remove <strong>the</strong> disease entirely, effects all after <strong>on</strong>e applicati<strong>on</strong>;as, <strong>the</strong>refore, if being <strong>on</strong>ce applied it accomplishes <strong>the</strong> whole, it proves its own strength in beingno more applied, <strong>and</strong> this is its business, <strong>to</strong> be no more applied; whereas if it is applied c<strong>on</strong>tinually,this is a plain pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> its not having strength. For it is <strong>the</strong> excellence <strong>of</strong> a medicine <strong>to</strong> be applied<strong>on</strong>ce, <strong>and</strong> not <strong>of</strong>ten. So is it in this case also. Why forsooth are <strong>the</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>tinually cured with <strong>the</strong>“same sacrifices”? For if <strong>the</strong>y were set free from all <strong>the</strong>ir sins, <strong>the</strong> sacrifices would not have g<strong>on</strong>e<strong>on</strong> being <strong>of</strong>fered every day. For <strong>the</strong>y had been appointed <strong>to</strong> be c<strong>on</strong>tinually <strong>of</strong>fered in behalf <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>whole people, both in <strong>the</strong> evening <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> day. So that <strong>the</strong>re was an arraignment <strong>of</strong> sins, <strong>and</strong> nota release from sins; an arraignment <strong>of</strong> weakness, not an exhibiti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> strength. For because <strong>the</strong> firsthad no strength, ano<strong>the</strong>r also was <strong>of</strong>fered: <strong>and</strong> since this effected nothing, again ano<strong>the</strong>r; so that itwas an evidence <strong>of</strong> sins. The “<strong>of</strong>fering” indeed <strong>the</strong>n, was an evidence <strong>of</strong> sins, <strong>the</strong> “c<strong>on</strong>tinually,”an evidence <strong>of</strong> weakness. But with regard <strong>to</strong> Christ, it was <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trary: He was “<strong>on</strong>ce <strong>of</strong>fered.”The types 3120 <strong>the</strong>refore c<strong>on</strong>tain <strong>the</strong> figure <strong>on</strong>ly, not <strong>the</strong> power; just as in images, <strong>the</strong> image has <strong>the</strong>figure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> man, not <strong>the</strong> power. So that <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> type have [somewhat] in comm<strong>on</strong> with<strong>on</strong>e ano<strong>the</strong>r. For <strong>the</strong> figure exists equally in both, but not <strong>the</strong> power. So <strong>to</strong>o also is it in respect <strong>of</strong>Heaven <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tabernacle, for <strong>the</strong> figure was equal: for <strong>the</strong>re was <strong>the</strong> Holy <strong>of</strong> Holies, but <strong>the</strong>power <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r things were not <strong>the</strong> same.What is, “He hath appeared <strong>to</strong> put away sin by <strong>the</strong> sacrifice <strong>of</strong> Himself”? 3121 What is this “puttingaway”? it is making c<strong>on</strong>temptible. For sin has no l<strong>on</strong>ger any boldness; for it is made <strong>of</strong> no effectin that when it ought <strong>to</strong> have dem<strong>and</strong>ed 3122 punishment, it did not dem<strong>and</strong> it: that is, it sufferedviolence: when it expected <strong>to</strong> destroy all men, <strong>the</strong>n it was itself destroyed.“He hath appeared by <strong>the</strong> sacrifice <strong>of</strong> Himself” (he says), that is, “He hath appeared,” un<strong>to</strong> God,<strong>and</strong> drawn near [un<strong>to</strong> Him]. For do not [think] because <strong>the</strong> High Priest was w<strong>on</strong>t <strong>to</strong> do this <strong>of</strong>tentimesin <strong>the</strong> year.… 3123 So that henceforward this is d<strong>on</strong>e in vain, although it is d<strong>on</strong>e; for what need is<strong>the</strong>re <strong>of</strong> medicines where <strong>the</strong>re are no wounds? On this account He ordained <strong>of</strong>ferings “c<strong>on</strong>tinually,”because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir want <strong>of</strong> power, <strong>and</strong> that a remembrance <strong>of</strong> sins might be made.3120ἀ ντίτυπα3121<strong>St</strong>. Chrys. here reverts <strong>to</strong> ch. ix. 26 , <strong>to</strong> supply an explanati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> words εἰς ἀθέτησιν τῆς ἁμαρτίας διὰ τῆς θυσίαςαὐτοῦ πεφανέρωται , which he had omitted before: ἀ θέτησις is properly [ “ setting aside. ” —F.G.] “ annulling ” “ renderinginvalid <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> no effect, ” <strong>the</strong>nce it is used for “ despising, ” “ treating as nothing worth. ”3122ὀ φείλουσα ἀπολαβεῖν3123This is an imperfect sentence; <strong>the</strong> interpola<strong>to</strong>r substitutes for <strong>the</strong> lacuna <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> next sentence <strong>the</strong> following: “ thatit was d<strong>on</strong>e simply <strong>and</strong> not because <strong>of</strong> weakness. For if it were not d<strong>on</strong>e because <strong>of</strong> weakness, why was it d<strong>on</strong>e at all? For if<strong>the</strong>re are no wounds, nei<strong>the</strong>r is <strong>the</strong>re afterwards need <strong>of</strong> medicines for <strong>the</strong> patient. ” Mr. Field prefers leaving it as it st<strong>and</strong>swithout c<strong>on</strong>jecturing what is omitted: <strong>on</strong>ly observing that <strong>the</strong> words “ this is d<strong>on</strong>e ” refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Levitical sacrifices c<strong>on</strong>tinuedafter <strong>the</strong> completi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> that <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cross.649

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!