12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m31“<strong>to</strong> hear” “Me”: but what? “<strong>the</strong> things which ye hear.” 183 So that if <strong>the</strong>y did not behold His comingin <strong>the</strong> Flesh, still <strong>the</strong>y knew that it would be, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y desired it, <strong>and</strong> believed <strong>on</strong> Him withouthaving seen Him in <strong>the</strong> Flesh.When <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong> Greeks bring charges such as <strong>the</strong>se against us, <strong>and</strong> say; “What <strong>the</strong>n didChrist in former time, that He did not look up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> race <strong>of</strong> men? And for what possible reas<strong>on</strong> didHe come at last <strong>to</strong> assist in our salvati<strong>on</strong>, after neglecting us so l<strong>on</strong>g?” we will reply, that beforethis He was in <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong>ok thought for His works, <strong>and</strong> was known <strong>to</strong> all who were worthy.But if ye should say, that, because all did not <strong>the</strong>n know Him, because He was <strong>on</strong>ly known by thosenoble <strong>and</strong> excellent pers<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong>refore He was not acknowledged; at this rate you will not allowthat He is worshiped even now, since even now all men do not know Him. But as at present no<strong>on</strong>e, because <strong>of</strong> those who do not know Him, would refuse credit <strong>to</strong> those who do, so as regardsformer times, we must not doubt that He was known <strong>to</strong> many, or ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> all <strong>of</strong> those noble <strong>and</strong>admirable pers<strong>on</strong>s.[2.] And if any <strong>on</strong>e say, “Why did not all men give heed <strong>to</strong> Him? nor all worship Him, but <strong>the</strong>just <strong>on</strong>ly?” I also will ask, why even now do not all men know him? But why do I speak <strong>of</strong> Christ,when not all men knew His Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>n, or know Him now? For some say, that all things are borneal<strong>on</strong>g by chance, while o<strong>the</strong>rs commit <strong>the</strong> providence <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> universe <strong>to</strong> devils. O<strong>the</strong>rs invent ano<strong>the</strong>rGod besides Him, <strong>and</strong> some blasphemously assert, that His is an opposing power, 184 <strong>and</strong> think thatHis laws are <strong>the</strong> laws <strong>of</strong> a wicked dæm<strong>on</strong>. What <strong>the</strong>n? Shall we say that He is not God because<strong>the</strong>re are some who say so? And shall we c<strong>on</strong>fess Him <strong>to</strong> be evil? for <strong>the</strong>re are some who even soblaspheme Him. Away with such mental w<strong>and</strong>ering, such utter insanity. If we should delineate 185doctrines according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> madmen, <strong>the</strong>re is nothing <strong>to</strong> hinder us from being madourselves with most grievous madness. No <strong>on</strong>e will assert, looking <strong>to</strong> those who have weak visi<strong>on</strong>,that <strong>the</strong> sun is injurious <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> eyes, but he will say that it is fitted <strong>to</strong> give light, drawing his judgmentsfrom pers<strong>on</strong>s in health. And no <strong>on</strong>e will call h<strong>on</strong>ey bitter, because it seems so <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sick. And will any, from <strong>the</strong> imaginati<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> men diseased (in mind) decide that God ei<strong>the</strong>r is not,or is evil; or that He sometimes indeed exerts His Providence, sometimes doth not so at all? Whocan say that such men are <strong>of</strong> sound mind, or deny that <strong>the</strong>y are beside <strong>the</strong>mselves, delirious, utterlymad?“The world,” he says, “knew Him not”; but <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong> whom <strong>the</strong> world was not worthy knew Him.And having spoken <strong>of</strong> those who knew Him not, he in a short time puts <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ignorance;for he does not absolutely say, that no <strong>on</strong>e knew Him, but that “<strong>the</strong> world knew him not”; that is,those pers<strong>on</strong>s who are as it were nailed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> world al<strong>on</strong>e, <strong>and</strong> who mind <strong>the</strong> things <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world.For so Christ was w<strong>on</strong>t <strong>to</strong> call <strong>the</strong>m; as when He says, “O Holy 186 Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> world hath not knownThee.” ( c. xvii. 25 .) The world <strong>the</strong>n was ignorant, not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>of</strong> Him, but also <strong>of</strong> His Fa<strong>the</strong>r, as wehave said; for nothing so darkens 187 <strong>the</strong> mind as <strong>to</strong> be closely attached 188 <strong>to</strong> present things.183 al. “for <strong>the</strong>y had both heard His voice, <strong>and</strong> seen Him, but not in <strong>the</strong> flesh.”184 i.e. that <strong>the</strong> power which maintains <strong>the</strong> universe is a power opposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> True God. The Gnostics accounted for <strong>the</strong>existence <strong>of</strong> evil, by supposing an evil Principle, <strong>to</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y attributed <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> support <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> material world. Theopini<strong>on</strong>s here spoken <strong>of</strong> were maintained by Basilides, Valentinus, Marci<strong>on</strong>, Manes, <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r supporters <strong>of</strong> that heresy.185χαρακτηρίζειν .186῞Αγις (δίκαις G. T.).187θολοῖ from θολὸς , “<strong>the</strong> ink <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> cuttle fish.”188προστετηκέναι .51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!