Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom373something out of things which are not: but the other, when things which have been made are aboutto fill back into non-existence, to hold and fasten them together, utterly at variance as they are witheach other: this is indeed great and wonderful, and a certain proof of exceeding power.Then showing the easiness, he said, “upholding”: (he did not say, governing, 2760 from the figureof those who simply with their finger move anything, and cause it to go round.) Here he showsboth the mass of the creation to be great, and that this greatness is nothing to Him. Then again heshows the freedom from the labor, saying, “By the word of His power.” Well said he, “By theword.” For since, with us, a word is accounted to be a bare thing, he shows that it is not bare withGod. But, how “He upholdeth by the word,” he hath not further added: for neither is it possible toknow. Then he added concerning His majesty: for thus John also did: having said that “He is God”( John i. 1 ), he brought in the handiwork of the Creation. For the same thing which the oneindirectly expressed, saying, “In the beginning was the Word,” and “All things were made by Him”( John i. 3 ), this did the other also openly declare by “the Word,” and by saying “by whom alsoHe made the worlds.” For thus he shows Him to be both a Creator, and before all ages. What then?when the prophet saith, concerning the Father, “Thou art from everlasting and to everlasting” ( Ps.xc. 2 ), and concerning the Son, that He is before all ages, and the maker of all things—what canthey say? Nay rather, when the very thing which was spoken of the Father,—“He which was beforethe worlds,”—this one may see spoken of the Son also? And that which one saith, “He was life” (John i. 4 ), pointing out the preservation of the creation, that Himself is the Life of all things,—soalso saith this other, “and upholding all things by the word of His power”: not as the Greeks whodefraud Him, as much as in them lies, both of Creation itself, and of Providence, shutting up Hispower, to reach only as far as to the Moon.“By Himself” (saith he) “having purged our sins.” Having spoken concerning those marvelousand great matters, which are most above us, he proceeds to speak also afterwards concerning Hiscare for men. For indeed the former expression, “and upholding all things,” also was universal:nevertheless this is far greater, for it also is universal: for, for His part, “all” men believed. 2761 AsJohn also, having said, “He was life,” and so pointed out His providence, saith again, and “He waslight.”“By Himself,” saith he, “having purged our sins, He sat down on the right hand of the Majestyon high.” He here setteth down two very great proofs of His care: first the “purifying us from oursins,” then the doing it “by Himself.” And in many places, thou seest him making very much ofthis,—not only of our reconciliation with God, but also of this being accomplished through theSon. For the gift being truly great, was made even greater by the fact that it was through the Son.For 2762 in saying, “He sat on the right hand,” and, “having by Himself purged our sins,”—thoughhe had put us in mind of the Cross, he quickly added the mention of the resurrection and ascension.And see his unspeakable wisdom: he said not, “He was commanded to sit down,” but “He satdown.” Then again, lest thou shouldest think that He standeth, he subjoins, “For to which of theangels said He at any time, Sit thou on My right hand.”“He sat” (saith he) “on the right hand of the Majesty on high.” What is this “on high”? Dothhe enclose God in place? Away with such a thought! but just as, when he saith, “on the right hand,”2760κυβερνῶν2761[i.e. so far as Christ’s work for men was concerned, it was universal. He put it in the power of all to believe.—F.G.]2762γὰρ , om. S.538

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomhe did not describe Him as having figure, but showed His equal dignity with the Father; so, insaying “on high,” he did not enclose Him there, but expressed the being higher than all things, andhaving ascended up above all things. That is, He attained even unto the very throne of the Father:as therefore the Father is on high, so also is He. For the “sitting together” implies nothing else thanequal dignity. But if they say, that He said, “Sit Thou,” we may ask them, What then? did He speakto Him standing? Moreover, he said not that He commanded, not that He enjoined, but that “Hesaid”: for no other reason, than that thou mightest not think Him without origin and without cause.For that this is why he said it, is evident from the place of His sitting. For had he intended to signifyinferiority, he would not have said, “on the right hand,” but on the left hand.Ver. 4 . “Being made,” saith he, “so much better than the angels, as He hath by inheritanceobtained a more excellent name than they.” The “being made,” here, is instead of “being shownforth,” as one may say. Then also from what does he reason confidently? From the Name. Seestthou that the name Son is wont to declare true relationship? And indeed if He were not a true Son(and “true” is nothing else than “of Him”), how does he reason confidently from this? For if He beSon only by grace, He not only is not “more excellent than the angels,” but is even less than they.How? Because righteous men too were called sons; and the name son, if it be not a genuine son,doth not avail to show the “excellency.” When too he would point out that there is a certain differencebetween creatures and their maker, hear what he saith:Ver. 5 . “For to which of the Angels said He at any time, Thou art My Son, this day have Ibegotten Thee. And again, I will be to Him a Father, and He shall be to Me a Son”? For these thingsindeed are spoken with reference also to the flesh: “I will be to Him a Father, and He shall be toMe a Son”—while this, 2763 “Thou art My Son, this day have I begotten Thee,” expresses nothingelse than “from [the time] that God is.” For as He is said to be, 2764 from the time present (for thisbefits Him more than any other), so also the [word] “To-day” seems to me to be spoken here withreference to the flesh. For when He hath taken hold of it, thenceforth he speaks out all boldly. Forindeed the flesh partakes of the high things, just as the Godhead of the lowly. For He who disdainednot to become man, and did not decline the reality, how should He have declined the expressions?Seeing then that we know these things, let us be ashamed of nothing, nor have any high thoughts.For if He Himself being God and Lord and Son of God, did not decline to take the form of a slave,much more ought we to do all things, though they be lowly. For tell me, O man, whence hast thouhigh thoughts? from things of this life? but these or ever they appear, run by. Or, from thingsspiritual? nay, this is itself one spiritual excellency,—to have no high thoughts.Wherefore then dost thou cherish high thoughts? because thou goest on aright? hear Christsaying, “When ye have done all things, say, we are unprofitable servants, for we have done thatwhich was our duty to do.” ( Luke xvii. 10 .)Or because of thy wealth hast thou high thoughts? Dost thou not see those before thee, howthey departed naked and desolate? did we not come naked into life, and naked also shall depart?who hath high thoughts on having what is another’s? for they who will use it to their own enjoyment2763Sav. and Ben. omit the words σήμερον … σε , and for ἐ ξ οὗ ἐστιν ὁ θεός ὥσπερ γὰρ have ἐ ξ αὐτοῦ ἐστιν· ὥσπερ δὲ , sothat the passage runs; “ but this, ‘ thou art My Son, ’ expresses nothing else than that He is of Him. And just as, ” &c…Thecorrector seems to have misapprehended the meaning of ἐ ξ οὗ in this place.2764ὢ ν539

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m373something out <strong>of</strong> things which are not: but <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, when things which have been made are about<strong>to</strong> fill back in<strong>to</strong> n<strong>on</strong>-existence, <strong>to</strong> hold <strong>and</strong> fasten <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, utterly at variance as <strong>the</strong>y are wi<strong>the</strong>ach o<strong>the</strong>r: this is indeed great <strong>and</strong> w<strong>on</strong>derful, <strong>and</strong> a certain pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> exceeding power.Then showing <strong>the</strong> easiness, he said, “upholding”: (he did not say, governing, 2760 from <strong>the</strong> figure<strong>of</strong> those who simply with <strong>the</strong>ir finger move anything, <strong>and</strong> cause it <strong>to</strong> go round.) Here he showsboth <strong>the</strong> mass <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> be great, <strong>and</strong> that this greatness is nothing <strong>to</strong> Him. Then again heshows <strong>the</strong> freedom from <strong>the</strong> labor, saying, “By <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> His power.” Well said he, “By <strong>the</strong>word.” For since, with us, a word is accounted <strong>to</strong> be a bare thing, he shows that it is not bare withGod. But, how “He upholdeth by <strong>the</strong> word,” he hath not fur<strong>the</strong>r added: for nei<strong>the</strong>r is it possible <strong>to</strong>know. Then he added c<strong>on</strong>cerning His majesty: for thus <strong>John</strong> also did: having said that “He is God”( <strong>John</strong> i. 1 ), he brought in <strong>the</strong> h<strong>and</strong>iwork <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Creati<strong>on</strong>. For <strong>the</strong> same thing which <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>eindirectly expressed, saying, “In <strong>the</strong> beginning was <strong>the</strong> Word,” <strong>and</strong> “All things were made by Him”( <strong>John</strong> i. 3 ), this did <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r also openly declare by “<strong>the</strong> Word,” <strong>and</strong> by saying “by whom alsoHe made <strong>the</strong> worlds.” For thus he shows Him <strong>to</strong> be both a Crea<strong>to</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> before all ages. What <strong>the</strong>n?when <strong>the</strong> prophet saith, c<strong>on</strong>cerning <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, “Thou art from everlasting <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> everlasting” ( Ps.xc. 2 ), <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>cerning <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>, that He is before all ages, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> maker <strong>of</strong> all things—what can<strong>the</strong>y say? Nay ra<strong>the</strong>r, when <strong>the</strong> very thing which was spoken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r,—“He which was before<strong>the</strong> worlds,”—this <strong>on</strong>e may see spoken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> also? And that which <strong>on</strong>e saith, “He was life” (<strong>John</strong> i. 4 ), pointing out <strong>the</strong> preservati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> creati<strong>on</strong>, that Himself is <strong>the</strong> Life <strong>of</strong> all things,—soalso saith this o<strong>the</strong>r, “<strong>and</strong> upholding all things by <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> His power”: not as <strong>the</strong> Greeks whodefraud Him, as much as in <strong>the</strong>m lies, both <strong>of</strong> Creati<strong>on</strong> itself, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> Providence, shutting up Hispower, <strong>to</strong> reach <strong>on</strong>ly as far as <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mo<strong>on</strong>.“By Himself” (saith he) “having purged our sins.” Having spoken c<strong>on</strong>cerning those marvelous<strong>and</strong> great matters, which are most above us, he proceeds <strong>to</strong> speak also afterwards c<strong>on</strong>cerning Hiscare for men. For indeed <strong>the</strong> former expressi<strong>on</strong>, “<strong>and</strong> upholding all things,” also was universal:never<strong>the</strong>less this is far greater, for it also is universal: for, for His part, “all” men believed. 2761 As<strong>John</strong> also, having said, “He was life,” <strong>and</strong> so pointed out His providence, saith again, <strong>and</strong> “He waslight.”“By Himself,” saith he, “having purged our sins, He sat down <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Majesty<strong>on</strong> high.” He here setteth down two very great pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>of</strong> His care: first <strong>the</strong> “purifying us from oursins,” <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> doing it “by Himself.” And in many places, thou seest him making very much <strong>of</strong>this,—not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>of</strong> our rec<strong>on</strong>ciliati<strong>on</strong> with God, but also <strong>of</strong> this being accomplished through <strong>the</strong>S<strong>on</strong>. For <strong>the</strong> gift being truly great, was made even greater by <strong>the</strong> fact that it was through <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>.For 2762 in saying, “He sat <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> right h<strong>and</strong>,” <strong>and</strong>, “having by Himself purged our sins,”—thoughhe had put us in mind <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cross, he quickly added <strong>the</strong> menti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> resurrecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>and</strong> ascensi<strong>on</strong>.And see his unspeakable wisdom: he said not, “He was comm<strong>and</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> sit down,” but “He satdown.” Then again, lest thou shouldest think that He st<strong>and</strong>eth, he subjoins, “For <strong>to</strong> which <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>angels said He at any time, Sit thou <strong>on</strong> My right h<strong>and</strong>.”“He sat” (saith he) “<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> right h<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Majesty <strong>on</strong> high.” What is this “<strong>on</strong> high”? Dothhe enclose God in place? Away with such a thought! but just as, when he saith, “<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> right h<strong>and</strong>,”2760κυβερνῶν2761[i.e. so far as Christ’s work for men was c<strong>on</strong>cerned, it was universal. He put it in <strong>the</strong> power <strong>of</strong> all <strong>to</strong> believe.—F.G.]2762γὰρ , om. S.538

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!