12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m28rashly striving <strong>to</strong> overshoot 163 by force <strong>of</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>ing this Life which is unlimited? You cannot doit. Why seek what may not be sought? Why be curious about what is incomprehensible? Why searchwhat is unsearchable? Gaze up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> very source <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sunbeams. You cannot; yet you are nei<strong>the</strong>rvexed nor impatient at your weakness; how <strong>the</strong>n have you become so daring <strong>and</strong> headl<strong>on</strong>g in greatermatters? The s<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> thunder, <strong>John</strong> who sounds 164 <strong>the</strong> spiritual trumpet, when he had heard from<strong>the</strong> Spirit <strong>the</strong> was , enquired no far<strong>the</strong>r. And are you, who share not in his grace, but speak fromyour own wretched reas<strong>on</strong>ings, ambitious <strong>to</strong> exceed <strong>the</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> his knowledge? Then for thisvery reas<strong>on</strong> you will never be able even <strong>to</strong> reach <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> measure <strong>of</strong> his knowledge. For this is <strong>the</strong>craft <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> devil: he leads away those who obey him from <strong>the</strong> limits assigned by God, as though<strong>to</strong> things much greater: but when, having enticed us by <strong>the</strong>se hopes, he has cast us out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> grace<strong>of</strong> God, he not <strong>on</strong>ly gives nothing more, (how can he, devil as he is?) but does not even allow us<strong>to</strong> return again <strong>to</strong> our former situati<strong>on</strong>, where we dwelt safely <strong>and</strong> surely, but leads us about in alldirecti<strong>on</strong>s w<strong>and</strong>ering <strong>and</strong> not having any st<strong>and</strong>ing ground. So he caused <strong>the</strong> first created man <strong>to</strong> bebanished from <strong>the</strong> abode <strong>of</strong> Paradise. Having puffed him up with <strong>the</strong> expectati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> greaterknowledge <strong>and</strong> h<strong>on</strong>or, he expelled him from what he already possessed in security. For he not <strong>on</strong>lydid not become like a god as (<strong>the</strong> devil) promised him, but even fell beneath <strong>the</strong> domini<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> death;having not <strong>on</strong>ly gained no fur<strong>the</strong>r advantage by eating <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> tree, but having lost no small porti<strong>on</strong><strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledge which he possessed, through hope <strong>of</strong> greater knowledge. For <strong>the</strong> sense <strong>of</strong> shame,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> desire <strong>to</strong> hide himself because <strong>of</strong> his nakedness, <strong>the</strong>n came up<strong>on</strong> him, who before <strong>the</strong> cheatwas superior <strong>to</strong> all such shame; <strong>and</strong> this very seeing himself <strong>to</strong> be naked, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> need for <strong>the</strong> future<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> covering <strong>of</strong> garments, <strong>and</strong> many o<strong>the</strong>r infirmities, 165 became <strong>the</strong>nceforth natural <strong>to</strong> him. Thatthis be not our case, let us obey God, c<strong>on</strong>tinue in His comm<strong>and</strong>ments, <strong>and</strong> not be busy about anythingbey<strong>on</strong>d <strong>the</strong>m, that we may not be cast out from <strong>the</strong> good things already given us. Thus <strong>the</strong>y havefared (<strong>of</strong> whom we speak). For seeking <strong>to</strong> find a beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Life which has no beginning,<strong>the</strong>y lost what <strong>the</strong>y might have retained. They found not what <strong>the</strong>y sought, (this is impossible,) <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong>y fell away from <strong>the</strong> true faith c<strong>on</strong>cerning <strong>the</strong> Only-Begotten.Let us not <strong>the</strong>n remove <strong>the</strong> eternal bounds which our fa<strong>the</strong>rs set, but let us ever yield <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> laws<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Spirit; <strong>and</strong> when we hear that “That was <strong>the</strong> true Light,” let us seek <strong>to</strong> discover nothing more.For it is not possible <strong>to</strong> pass bey<strong>on</strong>d this saying. Had His generati<strong>on</strong> been like that <strong>of</strong> a man, needsmust <strong>the</strong>re have been an interval between <strong>the</strong> begetter <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> begotten; but since it is in a mannerineffable <strong>and</strong> becoming God, give up <strong>the</strong> “before” <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> “after,” for <strong>the</strong>se are <strong>the</strong> names <strong>of</strong> pointsin time, but <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> is <strong>the</strong> Crea<strong>to</strong>r even <strong>of</strong> all ages. 166[2.] “Then,” says <strong>on</strong>e, “He is not Fa<strong>the</strong>r, but bro<strong>the</strong>r.” What need, pray? If we had asserted that<strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> were from a different root, you might have <strong>the</strong>n spoken this well. But, if weflee this impiety, <strong>and</strong> say <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, besides being without beginning, is Unbegotten also, while<strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>, though without beginning, is Begotten <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, what kind <strong>of</strong> need that as a c<strong>on</strong>sequence<strong>of</strong> this idea, that unholy asserti<strong>on</strong> should be introduced? N<strong>on</strong>e at all. For He is an Effulgence: butan effulgence is included in <strong>the</strong> idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> nature whose effulgence it is. For this reas<strong>on</strong> Paul hascalled Him so, that you may imagine no interval between <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>. ( Heb. i. 3 .)163ὑ περακοντίσαι .164 al. “holds.”165πάθη .166αἰώνων .47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!