Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom357probably the young Timothy received his first knowledge of Christianity. On St. Paul’s secondvisit to these cities he is spoken of as already “a disciple.” Barnabas must, therefore, have knownhim from the very beginning of his Christian life, and it is, therefore, entirely natural that he shouldspeak of him in the way recorded in Heb. xiii. 23 . After Barnabas and Paul returned from this,when disputes arose between the Jews and Gentiles, they were sent to Jerusalem together, andhaving obtained a favorable hearing before the Council again returned to Antioch. Here are yearsof closest companionship between Barnabas and St. Paul, during all the earlier part of whichBarnabas appears as the leader, Paul as the assistant. They had often stood together in the synagogueto tell to their fellow-countrymen the story of the cross, and probably had often discussed with oneanother the numerous Jewish converts. Barnabas must have been a man of dignity, for when thepeople of Lystra took them for gods, they selected Barnabas as Jupiter ( Acts xiv. 11, 12 ). Thecompanionship was broken up at the entrance upon another missionary journey, by a difference ofopinion about taking Mark with them. In this case Barnabas, although doubtless influenced by hiskinship, appears to have been the better judge of character, since at a later day St. Paul writes fromRome to Timothy, “Take Mark and bring him with thee; for he is profitable to me in the minis try”( 2 Tim. iv. 11 ); but however this may be, Barnabas showed in the matter independence anddetermination. He is called by the name of “Apostle” ( Acts xiv. 14 ), and altogether held such aposition in the Christian community as would make his writing such an Epistle a proper act. In allthat is related of him there is but one faulty act, and even this points him out as especially interestedin the Hebrews. When St. Peter behaved so ill at Antioch and received the sharp reproof of St. Paul,in his account of the matter St. Paul says, “the other Jews dissembled likewise with him”; and addsas evidence of the strength and danger of the defection, “insomuch that Barnabas also was carriedaway with their dissimulation” ( Gal. ii. 13, 14 ). Barnabas then was not only a Jew by birth, buthad strong sympathies with his race.More than this: he was a Levite. The particular line of argument adopted in the main part ofthe Epistle to the Hebrews is one which would have occurred to few, and scarcely to any who wasnot familiar with the temple ritual. There is no evidence that this was the case with Apollos; butwith Barnabas the temple service was a matter of professional duty, as well as the prompting ofhis devout heart. Indeed, an objection to the authorship of Barnabas has been based on this verypoint;—it is said that the author does not show that nicely accurate precision in his statements whichmight be expected from one personally familiar with the temple. The points referred to admit ofeasy explanation on other grounds; but were they better taken, considering that the service of theLevites was altogether subordinate to that of the priests, and did not lead them into the itself,the objection seems hypercritical. But one of the actual duties of the Levites, and a very prominentone, was that of chanting in the Levitical choirs in the courts of the temple. This would have ledto a special familiarity with the Psalms. Now it is a curious fact that about one-half of all thequotations from the Old Testament in the Epistle to the Hebrews are taken from the Psalms, andthat the author cites that book, relatively, nearly four times as often as St. Paul, and eight times asoften as St. Luke or the other writers. This fact is at once explained by the supposition that theauthor of the Epistle was a Levite. 2663 It is not unlikely that when that “great company of the priests2663The large proportion of quotations from the Psalms in this Epistle is noticed in the article upon it in Smith’s BibleDictionary (where the proportion is stated as 16 out of 32); but my attention was first called to the bearing of this upon thequestion of authorship by the quick observation of Rev. Hermann Lilienthal. It is not easy to give a precise numerical statement522

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomwere obedient to the faith” ( Acts vi. 7 ), Barnabas, as one of their attending Levites, was influencedby their example and with them accepted the faith of Christ.The only important objection urged against the authorship of Barnabas is, that since the timeof Tertullian until recently, there has never been any considerable weight of opinion in its favor.But this is accounted for by the almost universal acceptance in the meantime of the spurious Epistleof Barnabas as his genuine work. The two certainly could not have been written by the same person.The fact, however, that the spurious Epistle was attributed to him may be an indication of a beliefthat he had left to the Church some legacy of written teaching. Since that Epistle has been foundnot to be his, and is probably of a somewhat later day, there remains nothing to hinder the beliefthat the devout Levite of Cyprus, the early convert to Christianity while still in strong sympathywith the Christian Jews, the man of benevolence and wealth, and therefore probably of education,by birth the appointed servant of the temple, the man of independence and dignity, and yet of suchtender sympathy as to be surnamed “Son of consolation,” the long and intimate companion of St.Paul, and for years in the position of his superior,—there is nothing to hinder the acceptance of theearly ecclesiastical statement that he was also the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews.Frederic Gardiner.363HOMILIES OF ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM,ARCHBISHOP OF CONSTANTINOPLE,ON THEEPISTLE TO THE HEBREWSPublished after his Falling Asleep, from Notes by Constantine, Presbyter of Antioch.————————————of the proportion because of the large number of historical allusions which can hardly be reckoned as quotations, and alsobecause the New Testament writers often clothe their thoughts in the familiar words of the Old Testament, apparently withoutany conscious quotation. This matter, however, which cannot be tabulated, is quite in accord with the rest, and the wholeEpistle is saturated with the language and the historical allusions of the Psalms. Taking only what may fairly be consideredas designed quotations, the relative numbers taken from the Psalms are: Hebrews, 200; St. Luke, 25; St. Paul, 39; all others,25. The Apocalypse is omitted from the calculation. In the comparatively few quotations in St. Luke less than one-third (17out of 55) are from the Psalms, and every one of these in recording the words of others; less than one-fifth in St. Paul (16 outof 89); and in the others 22 out of 116. In Hebrews almost exactly one-half.523

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>mwere obedient <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> faith” ( Acts vi. 7 ), Barnabas, as <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir attending Levites, was influencedby <strong>the</strong>ir example <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong>m accepted <strong>the</strong> faith <strong>of</strong> Christ.The <strong>on</strong>ly important objecti<strong>on</strong> urged against <strong>the</strong> authorship <strong>of</strong> Barnabas is, that since <strong>the</strong> time<strong>of</strong> Tertullian until recently, <strong>the</strong>re has never been any c<strong>on</strong>siderable weight <strong>of</strong> opini<strong>on</strong> in its favor.But this is accounted for by <strong>the</strong> almost universal acceptance in <strong>the</strong> meantime <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> spurious <strong>Epistle</strong><strong>of</strong> Barnabas as his genuine work. The two certainly could not have been written by <strong>the</strong> same pers<strong>on</strong>.The fact, however, that <strong>the</strong> spurious <strong>Epistle</strong> was attributed <strong>to</strong> him may be an indicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> a beliefthat he had left <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church some legacy <strong>of</strong> written teaching. Since that <strong>Epistle</strong> has been foundnot <strong>to</strong> be his, <strong>and</strong> is probably <strong>of</strong> a somewhat later day, <strong>the</strong>re remains nothing <strong>to</strong> hinder <strong>the</strong> beliefthat <strong>the</strong> devout Levite <strong>of</strong> Cyprus, <strong>the</strong> early c<strong>on</strong>vert <strong>to</strong> Christianity while still in str<strong>on</strong>g sympathywith <strong>the</strong> Christian Jews, <strong>the</strong> man <strong>of</strong> benevolence <strong>and</strong> wealth, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore probably <strong>of</strong> educati<strong>on</strong>,by birth <strong>the</strong> appointed servant <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> temple, <strong>the</strong> man <strong>of</strong> independence <strong>and</strong> dignity, <strong>and</strong> yet <strong>of</strong> suchtender sympathy as <strong>to</strong> be surnamed “S<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> c<strong>on</strong>solati<strong>on</strong>,” <strong>the</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g <strong>and</strong> intimate compani<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>.Paul, <strong>and</strong> for years in <strong>the</strong> positi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> his superior,—<strong>the</strong>re is nothing <strong>to</strong> hinder <strong>the</strong> acceptance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>early ecclesiastical statement that he was also <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Epistle</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>.Frederic Gardiner.363HOMILIES OF ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM,ARCHBISHOP OF CONSTANTINOPLE,ON THEEPISTLE TO THE HEBREWSPublished after his Falling Asleep, from Notes by C<strong>on</strong>stantine, Presbyter <strong>of</strong> Antioch.————————————<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> proporti<strong>on</strong> because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large number <strong>of</strong> his<strong>to</strong>rical allusi<strong>on</strong>s which can hardly be reck<strong>on</strong>ed as quotati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> alsobecause <strong>the</strong> New Testament writers <strong>of</strong>ten clo<strong>the</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir thoughts in <strong>the</strong> familiar words <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Old Testament, apparently withoutany c<strong>on</strong>scious quotati<strong>on</strong>. This matter, however, which cannot be tabulated, is quite in accord with <strong>the</strong> rest, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> whole<strong>Epistle</strong> is saturated with <strong>the</strong> language <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> his<strong>to</strong>rical allusi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Psalms. Taking <strong>on</strong>ly what may fairly be c<strong>on</strong>sideredas designed quotati<strong>on</strong>s, <strong>the</strong> relative numbers taken from <strong>the</strong> Psalms are: <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 200; <strong>St</strong>. Luke, 25; <strong>St</strong>. Paul, 39; all o<strong>the</strong>rs,25. The Apocalypse is omitted from <strong>the</strong> calculati<strong>on</strong>. In <strong>the</strong> comparatively few quotati<strong>on</strong>s in <strong>St</strong>. Luke less than <strong>on</strong>e-third (17out <strong>of</strong> 55) are from <strong>the</strong> Psalms, <strong>and</strong> every <strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se in recording <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs; less than <strong>on</strong>e-fifth in <strong>St</strong>. Paul (16 out<strong>of</strong> 89); <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs 22 out <strong>of</strong> 116. In <strong>Hebrews</strong> almost exactly <strong>on</strong>e-half.523

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!