12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m352μ <strong>and</strong> .. 208................... 16................... 57................... 9μ , μ , μ .. 104................... 11................... 33................... 8—— —— —— ——Toge<strong>the</strong>r........... 381........... 47........... 190........... 27It is plain that while <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong> dwelt much more up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> brightness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> futurethan any o<strong>the</strong>r writer, he preferred <strong>to</strong> speak <strong>of</strong> it in <strong>the</strong> light <strong>of</strong> promise <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> inheritance , whileit rested in <strong>St</strong>. Paul’s mind more as a hope . This is <strong>the</strong> more noteworthy because <strong>the</strong> ideas <strong>of</strong> s<strong>on</strong>ship<strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> adopti<strong>on</strong> are very comm<strong>on</strong> in <strong>St</strong>. Paul. He al<strong>on</strong>e uses <strong>the</strong> word five times.The words μ <strong>and</strong> μ are curiously infrequent in a writer <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> present urgency <strong>of</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Paul,<strong>and</strong> are relatively most comm<strong>on</strong> in <strong>St</strong>. Luke <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, but most so in <strong>the</strong> last. In proporti<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>numbers are: <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 278; <strong>St</strong>. Luke, 207; <strong>St</strong>. Paul, 100; all o<strong>the</strong>rs, 153. That is, <strong>Hebrews</strong> uses<strong>the</strong>m nearly three times as <strong>of</strong>ten as <strong>St</strong>. Paul.The names for God <strong>and</strong> for our Lord are used by <strong>the</strong> various writers with much difference, <strong>and</strong>with an evident preference in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m for his own accus<strong>to</strong>med word. The proporti<strong>on</strong>ate numbers(which can take no note <strong>of</strong> periphrases) are as follows:—<strong>Hebrews</strong>. <strong>St</strong>. Luke. <strong>St</strong>. Paul. All O<strong>the</strong>rs.................. 774................. 463............... 1016............... 419............. 185................. 335................. 524............... 213.......... 150................. 255................. 405............... 519......... 150................... 69................. 562............... 102In all cases <strong>St</strong>. Paul uses <strong>the</strong>se words most freely (about twice as <strong>of</strong>ten as anybody else), exceptthat in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> he is exceeded by “o<strong>the</strong>r writers” as a result <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> large amount <strong>of</strong> narrativec<strong>on</strong>tained in <strong>the</strong>m. is used in <strong>Hebrews</strong> next in frequency <strong>to</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Paul, but with a l<strong>on</strong>g intervalbetween <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> very much more <strong>of</strong>ten than elsewhere. is used least frequently in <strong>Hebrews</strong>,while <strong>and</strong> are employed <strong>the</strong>re, <strong>on</strong>e with exactly <strong>the</strong> same frequency as <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, though<strong>St</strong>. Luke, <strong>St</strong>. Paul, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r writers employ <strong>the</strong>m very unequally, <strong>on</strong>e preferring <strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r. The use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se words is so much a matter <strong>of</strong> habit, habit alike <strong>of</strong> writing <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> mode<strong>of</strong> thinking, that <strong>the</strong>se go far <strong>to</strong> differentiate <strong>the</strong> writers.μ , , <strong>and</strong> are n<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m ever used in <strong>Hebrews</strong>. For <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>rs proporti<strong>on</strong>atenumbers are: <strong>St</strong>. Luke, 27 times; <strong>St</strong>. Paul, 35; all o<strong>the</strong>rs, 20.The group μ , μ , <strong>and</strong> is almost exclusively Pauline, occurring in his writings 58times, while it is nearly absent from <strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>on</strong>ly μ being used, <strong>and</strong> that but <strong>on</strong>ce. These wordsdo not occur in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r New Testament writers except three times in James. So also μ <strong>and</strong>μ μ are especially Pauline. They each occur <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>Hebrews</strong>. The first is found twice,<strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d not at all in <strong>St</strong>. Luke; butwhile μμ occurs 34 times in <strong>St</strong>. Paul, four times in o<strong>the</strong>r writers,μ is used by <strong>St</strong>. Paul ten times, <strong>and</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly three times elsewhere.is used 16 times by <strong>St</strong>. Paul, <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>ce each by <strong>Hebrews</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Luke, <strong>and</strong> seven timeselsewhere. <strong>and</strong> are much more frequent in <strong>St</strong>. Paul’s writings than elsewhere, but inthis case he is more nearly approached by <strong>Hebrews</strong> than by o<strong>the</strong>rs—yet with a great difference.Proporti<strong>on</strong>ate numbers are: <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 81; <strong>St</strong>. Luke, 54; <strong>St</strong>. Paul, 137; all o<strong>the</strong>rs, 22. The wordoccurs in <strong>Hebrews</strong> but <strong>on</strong>ce, <strong>and</strong> μ not at all. This is a noteworthy omissi<strong>on</strong> in our epistle,although it is also true that <strong>the</strong>y are not used by <strong>St</strong>. <strong>John</strong>, except three times in Revelati<strong>on</strong>.The two words are found in <strong>St</strong>. Luke <strong>and</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Paul each 33 times, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r writers 43 times.516

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!