Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom346Another question may be asked of the same kind. May not some indication of authorship befound in the number and character of the words common only to the Hebrews with St. Paul, withSt. Luke, and with the other writers respectively? There are 34 words common to St. Luke andHebrews, and found nowhere else; to St. Paul and Hebrews, 46; to all others and Hebrews, 28. Or,proportioning these numbers to the length of the several books, common to Luke and Hebrews,53.5; to St. Paul and Hebrews, 85.56; to other writers and Hebrews, 28; or nearly twice as manycommon to Hebrews with St. Luke, and more than three times as many common to Hebrews withSt. Paul, as there are common to Hebrews with other writers. This examination tends like the other,but much more strongly, to connect this Epistle both with St. Luke and St. Paul, but especially withthe latter. It falls in with the vacillating opinion of Origen, already given, and with his report of thecurrent traditions of his time.But much more important than the mere numerical statement, is the character of some of thesewords, used in common by these writers and by no others. Most of them, indeed, have nothingcharacteristic, and many are used but once by each of the writers, and that apparently without anyspecial design. There are several, however, worthy of more consideration. The noun and theverb , which might be expected to be common enough, are used only in Luke and Hebrews,the noun once in Luke, eight times in Hebrews; the verb 11 times in Luke, three times in Hebrews;or together, 12 times and 11 times. The noun μ is used once in Luke, five times in Hebrews,and nowhere else, while the verb μ is used five times by St. Paul, three times in Hebrews, andby no other writer. μ occurs three times in Luke, twice in Hebrews, and nowhere else.is used four times in Luke, twice in Hebrews, and not elsewhere. The word for star in Greek haseither form, or , and both are common in the LXX; but the former is used exclusively bySt. Luke (three times) and also in Hebrews, where, however, it occurs but once; but is usedexclusively by all the other New Testament writers, by St. Paul three times, by others 21 times. Onthe other hand, μ occurs twice in Hebrews, nine times in St. Paul, and in no other writer. Theverb (occurring three times) is peculiar to Hebrews, as is also the adverb , while theadjective occurs once in Hebrews, and seven times in St. Paul, being found nowhere else inthe New Testament. The striking adverb , not found in any other New Testament writer, occursthree times in Hebrews and twice in St. Paul. The verb with the nouns and andthe adjective , though common enough in the LXX, and apparently sufficiently often calledfor, are used in the New Testament only by St. Luke, St. Paul, and in Hebrews. The verb occursonce in each of them; is used once by St. Luke, three times by St. Paul, twice in Hebrews;three times by St. Paul, twice in Hebrews; while the adjective occurs only once in the last;i.e. taking the whole group together, it is employed twice by St. Luke, seven times by St. Paul, andsix times in Hebrews, and never elsewhere. The much more important word μ is used only inSt. Paul and Hebrews, three times in each. The same is true of μ , a word which might havebeen expected more frequently. There seems to be nothing peculiar about μ which yet happensto be found only in St. Paul (three times) and in Hebrews (twice). The words and alsooccur only in these writers, the former four times, the latter once in St. Paul; the former twice, thelatter once in Hebrews; or together, five times and three times. We are surprised to find such a wordas only in these writers, in each of them twice. The remarkable word , afterwards inanother sense of so much importance theologically, is found only in these writers, in St. Paul threetimes, in Hebrews twice.510

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom347The results of this comparison have a positive value, unless they can be, at least in some gooddegree, paralleled by words common to Hebrews and the other New Testament writers. I do notfind this to be the case. There seem to be but two words common only to Hebrews and to any ofthem occurring more than once in each. One of these is the purely accidental word μ , usedtwice in Hebrews, and seven times elsewhere (five times in Revelation); and the other is the moreimportant word μ (always in the plural = purifying ablutions) used twice each in Mark andHebrews. Whatever value, therefore, there may be in this examination of common words, it is muchincreased by the almost entire absence of any such relation between this Epistle and the otherwritings of the New Testament. It certainly points, as far as it goes, to some sort of relation betweenthe three writers, St. Luke, St. Paul, and the author of Hebrews, and especially between the twolast.We now turn to common words of wider range which yet have something in their usage tendingto show the style of the writer. The verb μ with its compounds -, -, -, -, -, -,and -, is naturally more common in narrative. Making allowance for this, we are surprised at itsrelative frequency in Hebrews and infrequency in the Pauline Epistles, while the word is in suchcommon use as to make this difference significant. The proportionate numbers are: Hebrews, 519;St. Luke, 656; St. Paul, 169; all others, 708. For the particular compound μ , the same numbersare: Hebrews, 196; St. Luke, 133; St. Paul, 7; all others, 91. While it is relatively much the mostfrequent in Hebrews, it is yet common in St. Luke, but almost entirely avoided by St. Paul.μ with its compounds -, -, and -, have a similar variable usage. They are all relativelymuch more frequent in Hebrews than elsewhere, less common in St. Luke, and still less so in St.Paul; taking the simple verb and its compounds separately, St. Luke alone uses that with (fourtimes actually, or relatively, six times), and almost entirely avoids that with , and St. Paul, likethe other writers, that with ; while Hebrews uses them all (except ) with peculiar frequency.The proportionate numbers are:—Hebrews. St. Luke. St. Paul. All Others.μ .. 196.... 80.... 61 157- 34.... 19...... 4.... 4- 139...... 1.... 20.. 25- —...... 6.... —.. ——— —— —— ——Total........... 369........... 106........... 85........... 186The verbs employed for request or prayer are numerous, and their employment by the differentwriters varies much. The following list of their relative frequency shows the principal facts:—Hebrews. St. Luke. St. Paul. All Others.. 11..... 330......... 7..... 46-....... —......... 3....... —..... —-....... —......... 2....... —..... —-....... —......... 3....... —..... —-..... 35......... 6......... 7..... —-.... —......... 1....... —....... 2μ . —......... 8......... 9....... 1μ . 11....... 23....... 11....... 5511

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m346Ano<strong>the</strong>r questi<strong>on</strong> may be asked <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same kind. May not some indicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> authorship befound in <strong>the</strong> number <strong>and</strong> character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> words comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong> with <strong>St</strong>. Paul, with<strong>St</strong>. Luke, <strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r writers respectively? There are 34 words comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Luke <strong>and</strong><strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>and</strong> found nowhere else; <strong>to</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Paul <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 46; <strong>to</strong> all o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 28. Or,proporti<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>the</strong>se numbers <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> several books, comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> Luke <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>,53.5; <strong>to</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Paul <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 85.56; <strong>to</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r writers <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, 28; or nearly twice as manycomm<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong> with <strong>St</strong>. Luke, <strong>and</strong> more than three times as many comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong> with<strong>St</strong>. Paul, as <strong>the</strong>re are comm<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong> with o<strong>the</strong>r writers. This examinati<strong>on</strong> tends like <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r,but much more str<strong>on</strong>gly, <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>nect this <strong>Epistle</strong> both with <strong>St</strong>. Luke <strong>and</strong> <strong>St</strong>. Paul, but especially with<strong>the</strong> latter. It falls in with <strong>the</strong> vacillating opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Origen, already given, <strong>and</strong> with his report <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>current traditi<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> his time.But much more important than <strong>the</strong> mere numerical statement, is <strong>the</strong> character <strong>of</strong> some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>sewords, used in comm<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong>se writers <strong>and</strong> by no o<strong>the</strong>rs. Most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, indeed, have nothingcharacteristic, <strong>and</strong> many are used but <strong>on</strong>ce by each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> writers, <strong>and</strong> that apparently without anyspecial design. There are several, however, worthy <strong>of</strong> more c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>. The noun <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>verb , which might be expected <strong>to</strong> be comm<strong>on</strong> enough, are used <strong>on</strong>ly in Luke <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>,<strong>the</strong> noun <strong>on</strong>ce in Luke, eight times in <strong>Hebrews</strong>; <strong>the</strong> verb 11 times in Luke, three times in <strong>Hebrews</strong>;or <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, 12 times <strong>and</strong> 11 times. The noun μ is used <strong>on</strong>ce in Luke, five times in <strong>Hebrews</strong>,<strong>and</strong> nowhere else, while <strong>the</strong> verb μ is used five times by <strong>St</strong>. Paul, three times in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>and</strong>by no o<strong>the</strong>r writer. μ occurs three times in Luke, twice in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>and</strong> nowhere else.is used four times in Luke, twice in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>and</strong> not elsewhere. The word for star in Greek hasei<strong>the</strong>r form, or , <strong>and</strong> both are comm<strong>on</strong> in <strong>the</strong> LXX; but <strong>the</strong> former is used exclusively by<strong>St</strong>. Luke (three times) <strong>and</strong> also in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, where, however, it occurs but <strong>on</strong>ce; but is usedexclusively by all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r New Testament writers, by <strong>St</strong>. Paul three times, by o<strong>the</strong>rs 21 times. On<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r h<strong>and</strong>, μ occurs twice in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, nine times in <strong>St</strong>. Paul, <strong>and</strong> in no o<strong>the</strong>r writer. Theverb (occurring three times) is peculiar <strong>to</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, as is also <strong>the</strong> adverb , while <strong>the</strong>adjective occurs <strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>and</strong> seven times in <strong>St</strong>. Paul, being found nowhere else in<strong>the</strong> New Testament. The striking adverb , not found in any o<strong>the</strong>r New Testament writer, occursthree times in <strong>Hebrews</strong> <strong>and</strong> twice in <strong>St</strong>. Paul. The verb with <strong>the</strong> nouns <strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> adjective , though comm<strong>on</strong> enough in <strong>the</strong> LXX, <strong>and</strong> apparently sufficiently <strong>of</strong>ten calledfor, are used in <strong>the</strong> New Testament <strong>on</strong>ly by <strong>St</strong>. Luke, <strong>St</strong>. Paul, <strong>and</strong> in <strong>Hebrews</strong>. The verb occurs<strong>on</strong>ce in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m; is used <strong>on</strong>ce by <strong>St</strong>. Luke, three times by <strong>St</strong>. Paul, twice in <strong>Hebrews</strong>;three times by <strong>St</strong>. Paul, twice in <strong>Hebrews</strong>; while <strong>the</strong> adjective occurs <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>the</strong> last;i.e. taking <strong>the</strong> whole group <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, it is employed twice by <strong>St</strong>. Luke, seven times by <strong>St</strong>. Paul, <strong>and</strong>six times in <strong>Hebrews</strong>, <strong>and</strong> never elsewhere. The much more important word μ is used <strong>on</strong>ly in<strong>St</strong>. Paul <strong>and</strong> <strong>Hebrews</strong>, three times in each. The same is true <strong>of</strong> μ , a word which might havebeen expected more frequently. There seems <strong>to</strong> be nothing peculiar about μ which yet happens<strong>to</strong> be found <strong>on</strong>ly in <strong>St</strong>. Paul (three times) <strong>and</strong> in <strong>Hebrews</strong> (twice). The words <strong>and</strong> alsooccur <strong>on</strong>ly in <strong>the</strong>se writers, <strong>the</strong> former four times, <strong>the</strong> latter <strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>St</strong>. Paul; <strong>the</strong> former twice, <strong>the</strong>latter <strong>on</strong>ce in <strong>Hebrews</strong>; or <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r, five times <strong>and</strong> three times. We are surprised <strong>to</strong> find such a wordas <strong>on</strong>ly in <strong>the</strong>se writers, in each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m twice. The remarkable word , afterwards inano<strong>the</strong>r sense <strong>of</strong> so much importance <strong>the</strong>ologically, is found <strong>on</strong>ly in <strong>the</strong>se writers, in <strong>St</strong>. Paul threetimes, in <strong>Hebrews</strong> twice.510

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!