Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom319Seest thou how she knew not as yet anything clearly concerning the Resurrection, but thoughtthere had been a removal of the body, and tells all simply to the disciples? And the Evangelist hathnot deprived the woman of such a praise, nor thought it shame that they should have learnt thesethings first from her who had passed the night in watching. Thus everywhere doth the truth-lovingnature of his disposition shine forth. When then she came and said these things, they hearing them,draw near with great eagerness to the sepulcher, 2514 and see the linen clothes lying, which was asign of the Resurrection. For neither, if any persons had removed the body, would they before doingso have stripped it; nor if any had stolen it, would they have taken the trouble to remove the napkin,and roll it up, and lay it in a place by itself; but how? they would have taken the body as it was. Onthis account John tells us by anticipation that it was buried with much myrrh, which glues linen tothe body not less firmly than lead; in order that when thou hearest that the napkins lay apart, thoumayest not endure those who say that He was stolen. For a thief would not have been so foolish asto spend so much trouble on a superfluous matter. For why should he undo the clothes? and howcould he have escaped detection if he had done so? since he would probably have spent much timein so doing, and be found out by delaying and loitering. But why do the clothes lie apart, while thenapkin was wrapped together by itself? That thou mayest learn that it was not the action of men inconfusion or haste, the placing some in one place, some in another, and the wrapping them together.From this they believed in the Resurrection. On this account Christ afterwards appeared to them,when they were convinced by what they had seen. Observe too here again the absence of boastfulnessin the Evangelist, how he witnesses to the exactness of Peter’s search. For he himself having gottenbefore Peter, and having seen the linen clothes, enquired not farther, but withdrew; but that ferventone passing farther in, looked at everything carefully, and saw somewhat more, and then the othertoo was summoned to the sight. 2515 For he entering after Peter, saw the grave-clothes lying, andseparate. Now to separate, and to place one thing by itself, and another, after rolling it up, by itself,was the act of some one doing things carefully, and not in a chance way, as if disturbed.[5.] But do thou, when thou hearest that thy Lord arose naked, cease from thy madness aboutfunerals; for what is the meaning of that superfluous and unprofitable 2516 expense, which bringsmuch loss to the mourners, and no gain to the departed, or (if we must say that it brings anything)rather harm? For the costliness of burial hath often caused the breaking open of tombs, and hathcaused him to be cast out naked and unburied, who had been buried with much care. But alas forvainglory! How great the tyranny which it exhibits even in sorrow! how great the folly! Many, thatthis may not happen, having cut in pieces those fine clothes, and filled them with many spices, sothat they may be doubly useless to those who would insult the dead, then commit them to the earth.Are not these the acts of madmen? of men beside themselves? to make a show of their ambition,and then to destroy it? “Yea,” saith some one, “it is in order that they may lie safely with the deadthat we use all these contrivances.” Well then, if the robbers do not get them, will not the mothsget them, and the worms? Or if the moths and worms get them not, will not time and the moisture2514Ver. 3–7 . “ Peter therefore went forth, and that other disciple, and came to the sepulcher. So they ran both together:and the other disciple did outrun Peter, and came first to the sepulcher. And he stooping down, saw the linen clothes lying;yet went he not in. Then cometh Simon Peter following him, and went into the sepulcher, and seeth the linen clothes lie; andthe napkin that was about His head, not lying with the linen clothes, but wrapped together in a place by itself. ” N.T.2515Ver. 8, 9 . “ Then went in also that other disciple which came first to the sepulcher, and he saw, and believed. For asyet they knew not the Scripture, that He must rise again from the dead. ” N.T.2516al. “ senseless. ”480

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom320of putrefaction 2517 destroy them? But let us suppose that neither tomb-breakers, nor moths, norworms, nor time, nor anything else, destroy what lies in the tomb, but that the body itself remainsuntouched until the Resurrection, and these things are preserved new and fresh and fine; whatadvantage is there from this to the departed, when the body is raised naked, while these remainhere, and profit us nothing for those accounts which must be given? “Wherefore then,” saith someone, “was it done in the case of Christ?” First of all, do not compare these with human matters,since the harlot poured even ointment upon His holy feet. But if we must speak on these things,we say, that they were done when the doers knew not the word of the Resurrection; therefore itsaith, “As was the manner of the Jews.” For they who honored Christ 2518 were not of the twelve,but were those who did not honor Him greatly. The twelve honored Him not in this way, but bydeath and massacre and dangers for His sake. That other indeed was honor, but far inferior to thisof which I have spoken. Besides, as I began by saying, we are now speaking of men, but at thattime these things were done with relation to the Lord. And that thou mayest learn that Christ madeno account of these things, He said, “Ye saw Me an hungered, and ye fed Me; thirsty, and ye gaveMe drink; naked, and ye clothed Me” ( Matt. xxv. 35 ); but nowhere did He say, “dead, and yeburied Me.” And this I say not as taking away the custom of burial, (that be far from me,) but ascutting short its extravagance and unseasonable vanity. “But,” saith some one, “feeling and griefand sympathy for the departed persuade to this practice.” The practice doth not proceed fromsympathy for the departed, but from vainglory. Since if thou desirest to sympathize with the dead,I will show thee another way of mourning, and will teach thee to put on him garments which shallrise again with him, and make him glorious. For these garments are not consumed by worms, norwasted by time, nor stolen by tomb-breakers. Of what sort then are these? The clothing of alms-doing;for this is a robe that shall rise again with him, because the seal of alms-doing is with him. Withthese garments shine they who then hear, “Hungering ye fed Me.” These make men distinguished,these make them glorious, these place them in safety; but those used now are only something formoths to consume, and a table for worms. And this I say, not forbid ding to use funeral observance,but bidding you to do it with moderation, so as to cover the body, and not commit it naked to theearth. For if living He biddeth us have no more than enough to cover us, much more when dead;since the dead body 2519 hath not so much need of garments as when it is living and breathing. Forwhen alive, on account of the cold, and for decency’s sake, we need the covering of garments, butwhen dead we require grave-clothes for none of these reasons, but that the body may not lie naked;and better than grave-clothes we have the earth, fairest of coverings, and more suited for the natureof such bodies as ours. If then where there are so many needs we must not search for anythingsuperfluous, much more where there is no such necessity, is the ostentation unseasonable.[6.] “But the lookers-on will laugh,” saith some one. Most certainly if there be any laughter,we need not care much for one so exceedingly foolish; but at present there are many who ratheradmire and accept our true wisdom. For these are not the things which deserve laughter, but thosewhich we do at present, weeping, and wailing, and burying ourselves with the departed; these thingsdeserve ridicule and punishment. But to show true wisdom, both in these respects and in the modestyof the attire used, prepares crowns and praises for us, and all will applaud us, and will admire the2517ἰ χὼρ2518i.e. in His burial.2519al. “ body of the dead. ”481

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m319Seest thou how she knew not as yet anything clearly c<strong>on</strong>cerning <strong>the</strong> Resurrecti<strong>on</strong>, but thought<strong>the</strong>re had been a removal <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> body, <strong>and</strong> tells all simply <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> disciples? And <strong>the</strong> Evangelist hathnot deprived <strong>the</strong> woman <strong>of</strong> such a praise, nor thought it shame that <strong>the</strong>y should have learnt <strong>the</strong>sethings first from her who had passed <strong>the</strong> night in watching. Thus everywhere doth <strong>the</strong> truth-lovingnature <strong>of</strong> his dispositi<strong>on</strong> shine forth. When <strong>the</strong>n she came <strong>and</strong> said <strong>the</strong>se things, <strong>the</strong>y hearing <strong>the</strong>m,draw near with great eagerness <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sepulcher, 2514 <strong>and</strong> see <strong>the</strong> linen clo<strong>the</strong>s lying, which was asign <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Resurrecti<strong>on</strong>. For nei<strong>the</strong>r, if any pers<strong>on</strong>s had removed <strong>the</strong> body, would <strong>the</strong>y before doingso have stripped it; nor if any had s<strong>to</strong>len it, would <strong>the</strong>y have taken <strong>the</strong> trouble <strong>to</strong> remove <strong>the</strong> napkin,<strong>and</strong> roll it up, <strong>and</strong> lay it in a place by itself; but how? <strong>the</strong>y would have taken <strong>the</strong> body as it was. Onthis account <strong>John</strong> tells us by anticipati<strong>on</strong> that it was buried with much myrrh, which glues linen <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> body not less firmly than lead; in order that when thou hearest that <strong>the</strong> napkins lay apart, thoumayest not endure those who say that He was s<strong>to</strong>len. For a thief would not have been so foolish as<strong>to</strong> spend so much trouble <strong>on</strong> a superfluous matter. For why should he undo <strong>the</strong> clo<strong>the</strong>s? <strong>and</strong> howcould he have escaped detecti<strong>on</strong> if he had d<strong>on</strong>e so? since he would probably have spent much timein so doing, <strong>and</strong> be found out by delaying <strong>and</strong> loitering. But why do <strong>the</strong> clo<strong>the</strong>s lie apart, while <strong>the</strong>napkin was wrapped <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r by itself? That thou mayest learn that it was not <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> men inc<strong>on</strong>fusi<strong>on</strong> or haste, <strong>the</strong> placing some in <strong>on</strong>e place, some in ano<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> wrapping <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r.From this <strong>the</strong>y believed in <strong>the</strong> Resurrecti<strong>on</strong>. On this account Christ afterwards appeared <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m,when <strong>the</strong>y were c<strong>on</strong>vinced by what <strong>the</strong>y had seen. Observe <strong>to</strong>o here again <strong>the</strong> absence <strong>of</strong> boastfulnessin <strong>the</strong> Evangelist, how he witnesses <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> exactness <strong>of</strong> Peter’s search. For he himself having gottenbefore Peter, <strong>and</strong> having seen <strong>the</strong> linen clo<strong>the</strong>s, enquired not far<strong>the</strong>r, but withdrew; but that fervent<strong>on</strong>e passing far<strong>the</strong>r in, looked at everything carefully, <strong>and</strong> saw somewhat more, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<strong>to</strong>o was summ<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sight. 2515 For he entering after Peter, saw <strong>the</strong> grave-clo<strong>the</strong>s lying, <strong>and</strong>separate. Now <strong>to</strong> separate, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> place <strong>on</strong>e thing by itself, <strong>and</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r, after rolling it up, by itself,was <strong>the</strong> act <strong>of</strong> some <strong>on</strong>e doing things carefully, <strong>and</strong> not in a chance way, as if disturbed.[5.] But do thou, when thou hearest that thy Lord arose naked, cease from thy madness aboutfunerals; for what is <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong> that superfluous <strong>and</strong> unpr<strong>of</strong>itable 2516 expense, which bringsmuch loss <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> mourners, <strong>and</strong> no gain <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> departed, or (if we must say that it brings anything)ra<strong>the</strong>r harm? For <strong>the</strong> costliness <strong>of</strong> burial hath <strong>of</strong>ten caused <strong>the</strong> breaking open <strong>of</strong> <strong>to</strong>mbs, <strong>and</strong> hathcaused him <strong>to</strong> be cast out naked <strong>and</strong> unburied, who had been buried with much care. But alas forvainglory! How great <strong>the</strong> tyranny which it exhibits even in sorrow! how great <strong>the</strong> folly! Many, thatthis may not happen, having cut in pieces those fine clo<strong>the</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> filled <strong>the</strong>m with many spices, sothat <strong>the</strong>y may be doubly useless <strong>to</strong> those who would insult <strong>the</strong> dead, <strong>the</strong>n commit <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> earth.Are not <strong>the</strong>se <strong>the</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> madmen? <strong>of</strong> men beside <strong>the</strong>mselves? <strong>to</strong> make a show <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir ambiti<strong>on</strong>,<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n <strong>to</strong> destroy it? “Yea,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e, “it is in order that <strong>the</strong>y may lie safely with <strong>the</strong> deadthat we use all <strong>the</strong>se c<strong>on</strong>trivances.” Well <strong>the</strong>n, if <strong>the</strong> robbers do not get <strong>the</strong>m, will not <strong>the</strong> mothsget <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> worms? Or if <strong>the</strong> moths <strong>and</strong> worms get <strong>the</strong>m not, will not time <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> moisture2514Ver. 3–7 . “ Peter <strong>the</strong>refore went forth, <strong>and</strong> that o<strong>the</strong>r disciple, <strong>and</strong> came <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sepulcher. So <strong>the</strong>y ran both <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r:<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r disciple did outrun Peter, <strong>and</strong> came first <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sepulcher. And he s<strong>to</strong>oping down, saw <strong>the</strong> linen clo<strong>the</strong>s lying;yet went he not in. Then cometh Sim<strong>on</strong> Peter following him, <strong>and</strong> went in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sepulcher, <strong>and</strong> seeth <strong>the</strong> linen clo<strong>the</strong>s lie; <strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong> napkin that was about His head, not lying with <strong>the</strong> linen clo<strong>the</strong>s, but wrapped <strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r in a place by itself. ” N.T.2515Ver. 8, 9 . “ Then went in also that o<strong>the</strong>r disciple which came first <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> sepulcher, <strong>and</strong> he saw, <strong>and</strong> believed. For asyet <strong>the</strong>y knew not <strong>the</strong> Scripture, that He must rise again from <strong>the</strong> dead. ” N.T.2516al. “ senseless. ”480

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!