12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m“for <strong>the</strong>m whom Thou hast given Me.” He c<strong>on</strong>tinually putteth <strong>the</strong> “hast given,” that <strong>the</strong>y mightlearn that this seemeth good <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. Then, because He had said c<strong>on</strong>tinually, “<strong>the</strong>y are Thine,”<strong>and</strong>, “Thou gavest <strong>the</strong>m un<strong>to</strong> Me,” <strong>to</strong> remove any evil suspici<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> lest any <strong>on</strong>e should think thatHis authority was recent, <strong>and</strong> that He had but now received <strong>the</strong>m, what saith He?[2.] Ver. 10 . “All Mine are Thine, <strong>and</strong> Thine are Mine; <strong>and</strong> I am glorified in <strong>the</strong>m.”Seest thou <strong>the</strong> equality <strong>of</strong> h<strong>on</strong>or? For lest <strong>on</strong> hearing, “Thou hast given <strong>the</strong>m Me,” thou shouldestdeem that <strong>the</strong>y were alienated from <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, or before this from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>,He removed both difficulties by speaking as He did. It was as though He said, “Do not when thouhearest that ‘Thou hast given <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> Me,’ deem that <strong>the</strong>y are alienated from <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, for whatis Mine is His; nor when thou hearest, ‘Thine <strong>the</strong>y were,’ think that <strong>the</strong>y were aliens from Me, forwhat is His is Mine.” So that <strong>the</strong>, “Thou hast given,” is said <strong>on</strong>ly for c<strong>on</strong>descensi<strong>on</strong>; for what <strong>the</strong>Fa<strong>the</strong>r hath is <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>’s, <strong>and</strong> what <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> hath is <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s. But this cannot even be said <strong>of</strong> as<strong>on</strong> after <strong>the</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> man, but because They 2330 are up<strong>on</strong> a greater Equality <strong>of</strong> h<strong>on</strong>or. 2331 Forthat what bel<strong>on</strong>gs <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> less, bel<strong>on</strong>gs <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> greater also, is clear <strong>to</strong> every <strong>on</strong>e, but <strong>the</strong> reverse notso; but here He c<strong>on</strong>verteth 2332 <strong>the</strong>se terms, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>versi<strong>on</strong> declares 2333 Equality. And in ano<strong>the</strong>rplace, declaring this, He said, “All things that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r hath are Mine,” speaking <strong>of</strong> knowledge.And <strong>the</strong> “hast given Me,” <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> like expressi<strong>on</strong>s, are <strong>to</strong> show that He did not come as an alien<strong>and</strong> draw <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> Him, but received <strong>the</strong>m as His own. Then He putteth <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>,saying, “And I am glorified in <strong>the</strong>m,” that is, ei<strong>the</strong>r that “I have power over <strong>the</strong>m,” or, that “<strong>the</strong>yshall glorify Me, believing in Thee <strong>and</strong> Me, <strong>and</strong> shall glorify Us alike.” But if He is not glorifiedequally in <strong>the</strong>m, what is <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s is no l<strong>on</strong>ger His. For no <strong>on</strong>e is glorified in those over whomhe hath no authority. Yet how is He glorified equally? All die for Him equally as for <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r;<strong>the</strong>y preach Him as <strong>the</strong>y do <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>and</strong> as <strong>the</strong>y say that all things are d<strong>on</strong>e in His Name, so alsoin <strong>the</strong> Name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>.Ver. 11 . “And now I am no more in <strong>the</strong> world, but <strong>the</strong>se are in <strong>the</strong> world.” 2334That is, “Although I appear no l<strong>on</strong>ger in <strong>the</strong> flesh, yet by <strong>the</strong>se am I glorified.” But why dothHe say c<strong>on</strong>tinuously, that, “I am not in <strong>the</strong> world”; <strong>and</strong> that, “because I leave <strong>the</strong>m I commit <strong>the</strong>m<strong>to</strong> Thee”; <strong>and</strong> that, “when I was in <strong>the</strong> world I kept <strong>the</strong>m”? for if <strong>on</strong>e should take <strong>the</strong>se words in<strong>the</strong>ir simple sense, many absurdities will follow. For how could it be reas<strong>on</strong>able <strong>to</strong> say, that He isno l<strong>on</strong>ger in <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>and</strong> that when He departeth He committeth <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r? since <strong>the</strong>seare <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> a mere man parting from <strong>the</strong>m forever. Seest thou how He speaketh for <strong>the</strong> mostpart like a man, <strong>and</strong> in a way adapted <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir state <strong>of</strong> mind, because <strong>the</strong>y thought that <strong>the</strong>y had agreater degree <strong>of</strong> safety from His presence? Wherefore He saith, “While I was with <strong>the</strong>m, I kept<strong>the</strong>m.” ( c. xiv. 28 .) Yet He telleth <strong>the</strong>m, “I come <strong>to</strong> you”; <strong>and</strong>, “I am with you till <strong>the</strong> end.” (Matt. xxviii. 20 .) How <strong>the</strong>n 2335 saith He <strong>the</strong>se words, as if about <strong>to</strong> be parted from <strong>the</strong>m? He2330i.e. <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>.2331μείζονός εἰσιν ἰσοτιμίας . If this be <strong>the</strong> right reading, <strong>the</strong> sense is, that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> are more Equal in h<strong>on</strong>orthan human fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> s<strong>on</strong>. Sav. reads μεῖζον . Ben. μείζονός ἐστιν , omitting ἰ σ2332ἀ ντιστρέφει2333al. “ shows. ”2334“ in <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>and</strong> I come <strong>to</strong> Thee. Holy Fa<strong>the</strong>r, keep through Thine own Name those whom Thou hast given Me, that<strong>the</strong>y may be <strong>on</strong>e as we are. ” N.T.2335al. “ how now. ”449

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!