Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomwith words of humility. And where hath He done this? Nay, where hath He not done it? See, forinstance, what He saith at the beginning, “As I hear, I judge.” ( c. v. 30 .) Then in a loftier tone,“As the Father raiseth up the dead, and quickeneth them, so also the Son quickeneth whom Hewill” ( c. v. 21 ); again, “I judge you not, there is another that judgeth.” Then again He retireth.Then coming to Galilee, “Labor not,” He saith, “for the meat that perisheth” ( c. vi. 27 ); and afterhaving said great things of Himself, that He came down from Heaven, that He giveth eternal life,He again withdraweth Himself. And He cometh in the Feast of Tabernacles also, and doth the same.And one may see Him continually thus varying His teaching, by His presence, by His absence, bylowly, by high discourses. Which He also did here. “Though He had done so many miracles,” itsaith, “they believed not on Him.”Ver. 38 . “That the saying of Esaias 1916 might be fulfilled which he spake, Lord, who hathbelieved our report, and to whom hath the arm of the Lord been revealed?” And again,Ver. 39–41 . “They 1917 could not believe,” it saith, “because that Esaias said, 1918 Ye shall hearwith your ears, and not understand. 1919 These things he said, 1920 when he saw His glory, and spakeof Him.”Here again observe, that the “because,” and “spake,” refer not to the cause of their unbelief,but to the event. For it was not “because” Isaiah spake, that they believed not; but because theywere not about to believe, that he spake. Why then doth not the Evangelist express it so, instead ofmaking the unbelief proceed from the prophecy, not the prophecy from the unbelief? And fartheron he putteth this very thing more positively, saying, “Therefore they could not believe, becausethat Esaias said.” He desires hence to establish by many proofs the unerring truth of Scripture, andthat what Isaiah foretold fell not out otherwise, but as he said. For lest any one should say,“Wherefore did Christ come? Knew he not that they would give no heed to him?” he introducesthe Prophets, who knew this also. But He came that they might have no excuse for their sin; forwhat things the Prophet foretold, he foretold as certainly to be; since if they were not certainly tobe, he could not have foretold them; and they were certainly to be, because these men were incurable.And if, “they could not,” is put, instead of, “they would not,” do not marvel, 1921 for He saithalso in another place, “He that is able to receive it, let him receive it.” ( Matt. xix. 12 .) So in manyplaces He is wont to term choice, power. Again, “The world cannot hate you, but Me it hateth.” (c. vii. 7 .) This one may even see observed in common conversation; as when a man saith, “I cannotlove this or that person,” calling the force of his will, power. And again, “this or that person cannotbe a good man.” And what saith the Prophet? “If the Ethiopian shall change his skin, or the leopardhis spots, this people also shall be able to do good, having learned evil.” ( Jer. xiii. 23 , LXX.) Hesaith not that the doing of virtue is impossible to them, but that because they will not, thereforethey cannot. And by what he saith the Evangelist means, that it was impossible for the Prophet tolie; yet it was not on that account impossible that they should believe. For it was possible, even hadthey believed, that he should remain true; since he would not have prophesied these things if they1916“ Esaias the prophet, ” N.T.1917“ therefore they, ” N.T.1918“ said again, ” N.T.1919Ver. 40 . “ He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart: that they should not see with their eyes, nor understandwith their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them. ” N.T.1920“ said Esaias, ” N.T.1921Ben. “ and if ‘ they could not ’ is put, it is put instead ofthey would not. ’ And do not marvel. ”378

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom251had been about to believe. “Why then,” saith some one, “did he not say so?” Because Scripturehath certain idiomatic phrases of this kind, and it is needful to make allowance for its laws.“The seethings he spake when he saw His glory.” Whose? The Father’s. How then doth Johnspeak of the Son? and Paul of the Spirit? Not as confounding the Persons, but as showing that theDignity is one, they say it. 1922 For that which is the Father’s is the Son’s also, and that which is theSon’s is the Spirit’s. 1923 Yet many things God spake by Angels, and no one saith, “as the Angelspake,” but how? “as God spake.” Since what hath been said by God through the ministry of Angelswould be of God; yet not therefore is what is of God, of the Angels also. But in this place Johnsaith that the words are the Spirit’s.“And spake of Him.” What spake he? “I saw the Lord sitting upon a high throne” ( Isa. vi. 1), and what follows. Therefore he there calleth “glory,” that vision, the smoke, the hearingunutterable Mysteries, the beholding the Seraphim, the lightning which leaped from the throne,against which those powers could not look. “And spake of Him.” What said he? That he heard avoice, saying, “Whom shall I send? who shall go? And I said, Here am I, send me. And He said,Ye shall hear with your ears, and shall not understand, and seeing ye shall see, and not perceive.”( Isa. vi. 8, 10 .) For,Ver. 40 . “He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart, lest they at any time should seewith their eyes, and understand with their heart.”Here again is another question, but it is not so if we rightly consider it. For as the sun dazzlesthe eyes of the weak, not by reason of 1924 its proper nature, so it is with those who give not heedto the words of God. Thus, in the case of Pharaoh, He is said to have hardened his heart, and so itis with those who are at all contentious against the words of God. This is a peculiar mode of speechin Scripture, as also the, “He gave them over unto a reprobate mind” ( Rom. i. 28 ), and the, “Hedivided them to the nations,” 1925 that is, allowed, permitted them to go. For the writer doth not hereintroduce God as Himself working these things, but showeth that they took place through thewickedness of others. For, when we are abandoned by God, we are given up to the devil, and whenso given up, we suffer ten thousand dreadful things. To terrify the hearer, therefore, the writer saith,“He hardened,” and “gave over.” For to show that He doth not only not give us over, but doth noteven leave us, except we will it, hear what He saith, “Do not your iniquities separate between Meand you?” ( Isa. lix. 2 , LXX.). And again, “They that go far away from Thee shall perish.” ( Ps.lxxiii. 27 , LXX.) And Hosea saith, “Thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, and I will also forgetthee” ( Hos. iv. 6 , LXX.); and He saith Himself also in the Gospels, “How often would I havegathered your children—and ye would not.” ( Luke xiii. 34 .) Esaias also again, “I came, and therewas no man; I called, and there was none to hearken.” ( Isa. l. 2 , LXX.) These things He saith,showing that we begin the desertion, and become the causes of our perdition; for God not onlydesireth not to leave or to punish us, but even when He punisheth, doth it unwillingly; “I will not,”He saith, “the death of a sinner, so much as that he should turn and live.” ( Ezek. xviii. 32 , LXX.)Christ also mourneth over the destruction of Jerusalem, 1926 as we also do over our friends.1922al. “ saith one. ”1923al. “ the Father’s. ”1924παρὰ1925ἀ πένειμε τοῖς ἔθνεσι . The words are found in Deut iv. 19 , LXX., but are there spoken concerning the heavenly bodies.1926al. “ being about to destroy Jerusalem even weepeth. ”379

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>mwith words <strong>of</strong> humility. And where hath He d<strong>on</strong>e this? Nay, where hath He not d<strong>on</strong>e it? See, forinstance, what He saith at <strong>the</strong> beginning, “As I hear, I judge.” ( c. v. 30 .) Then in a l<strong>of</strong>tier t<strong>on</strong>e,“As <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r raiseth up <strong>the</strong> dead, <strong>and</strong> quickeneth <strong>the</strong>m, so also <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> quickeneth whom Hewill” ( c. v. 21 ); again, “I judge you not, <strong>the</strong>re is ano<strong>the</strong>r that judgeth.” Then again He retireth.Then coming <strong>to</strong> Galilee, “Labor not,” He saith, “for <strong>the</strong> meat that perisheth” ( c. vi. 27 ); <strong>and</strong> afterhaving said great things <strong>of</strong> Himself, that He came down from Heaven, that He giveth eternal life,He again withdraweth Himself. And He cometh in <strong>the</strong> Feast <strong>of</strong> Tabernacles also, <strong>and</strong> doth <strong>the</strong> same.And <strong>on</strong>e may see Him c<strong>on</strong>tinually thus varying His teaching, by His presence, by His absence, bylowly, by high discourses. Which He also did here. “Though He had d<strong>on</strong>e so many miracles,” itsaith, “<strong>the</strong>y believed not <strong>on</strong> Him.”Ver. 38 . “That <strong>the</strong> saying <strong>of</strong> Esaias 1916 might be fulfilled which he spake, Lord, who hathbelieved our report, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> whom hath <strong>the</strong> arm <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord been revealed?” And again,Ver. 39–41 . “They 1917 could not believe,” it saith, “because that Esaias said, 1918 Ye shall hearwith your ears, <strong>and</strong> not underst<strong>and</strong>. 1919 These things he said, 1920 when he saw His glory, <strong>and</strong> spake<strong>of</strong> Him.”Here again observe, that <strong>the</strong> “because,” <strong>and</strong> “spake,” refer not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir unbelief,but <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> event. For it was not “because” Isaiah spake, that <strong>the</strong>y believed not; but because <strong>the</strong>ywere not about <strong>to</strong> believe, that he spake. Why <strong>the</strong>n doth not <strong>the</strong> Evangelist express it so, instead <strong>of</strong>making <strong>the</strong> unbelief proceed from <strong>the</strong> prophecy, not <strong>the</strong> prophecy from <strong>the</strong> unbelief? And far<strong>the</strong>r<strong>on</strong> he putteth this very thing more positively, saying, “Therefore <strong>the</strong>y could not believe, becausethat Esaias said.” He desires hence <strong>to</strong> establish by many pro<strong>of</strong>s <strong>the</strong> unerring truth <strong>of</strong> Scripture, <strong>and</strong>that what Isaiah fore<strong>to</strong>ld fell not out o<strong>the</strong>rwise, but as he said. For lest any <strong>on</strong>e should say,“Wherefore did Christ come? Knew he not that <strong>the</strong>y would give no heed <strong>to</strong> him?” he introduces<strong>the</strong> Prophets, who knew this also. But He came that <strong>the</strong>y might have no excuse for <strong>the</strong>ir sin; forwhat things <strong>the</strong> Prophet fore<strong>to</strong>ld, he fore<strong>to</strong>ld as certainly <strong>to</strong> be; since if <strong>the</strong>y were not certainly <strong>to</strong>be, he could not have fore<strong>to</strong>ld <strong>the</strong>m; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y were certainly <strong>to</strong> be, because <strong>the</strong>se men were incurable.And if, “<strong>the</strong>y could not,” is put, instead <strong>of</strong>, “<strong>the</strong>y would not,” do not marvel, 1921 for He saithalso in ano<strong>the</strong>r place, “He that is able <strong>to</strong> receive it, let him receive it.” ( Matt. xix. 12 .) So in manyplaces He is w<strong>on</strong>t <strong>to</strong> term choice, power. Again, “The world cannot hate you, but Me it hateth.” (c. vii. 7 .) This <strong>on</strong>e may even see observed in comm<strong>on</strong> c<strong>on</strong>versati<strong>on</strong>; as when a man saith, “I cannotlove this or that pers<strong>on</strong>,” calling <strong>the</strong> force <strong>of</strong> his will, power. And again, “this or that pers<strong>on</strong> cannotbe a good man.” And what saith <strong>the</strong> Prophet? “If <strong>the</strong> Ethiopian shall change his skin, or <strong>the</strong> leopardhis spots, this people also shall be able <strong>to</strong> do good, having learned evil.” ( Jer. xiii. 23 , LXX.) Hesaith not that <strong>the</strong> doing <strong>of</strong> virtue is impossible <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, but that because <strong>the</strong>y will not, <strong>the</strong>refore<strong>the</strong>y cannot. And by what he saith <strong>the</strong> Evangelist means, that it was impossible for <strong>the</strong> Prophet <strong>to</strong>lie; yet it was not <strong>on</strong> that account impossible that <strong>the</strong>y should believe. For it was possible, even had<strong>the</strong>y believed, that he should remain true; since he would not have prophesied <strong>the</strong>se things if <strong>the</strong>y1916“ Esaias <strong>the</strong> prophet, ” N.T.1917“ <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y, ” N.T.1918“ said again, ” N.T.1919Ver. 40 . “ He hath blinded <strong>the</strong>ir eyes, <strong>and</strong> hardened <strong>the</strong>ir heart: that <strong>the</strong>y should not see with <strong>the</strong>ir eyes, nor underst<strong>and</strong>with <strong>the</strong>ir heart, <strong>and</strong> be c<strong>on</strong>verted, <strong>and</strong> I should heal <strong>the</strong>m. ” N.T.1920“ said Esaias, ” N.T.1921Ben. “ <strong>and</strong> if ‘ <strong>the</strong>y could not ’ is put, it is put instead <strong>of</strong> ‘ <strong>the</strong>y would not. ’ And do not marvel. ”378

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!