12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m223Ver. 33–36 . 1648 “For a good work we st<strong>on</strong>e <strong>the</strong>e not, but for blasphemy; <strong>and</strong> because that thoubeing a man makest thyself God”; hear His answer; 1649 “If <strong>the</strong> Scripture called 1650 <strong>the</strong>m gods un<strong>to</strong>whom <strong>the</strong> word <strong>of</strong> God came, 1651 how say ye that I blaspheme, because I said, I am <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong>God?”What He saith is <strong>of</strong> this kind: “If those who have received this h<strong>on</strong>or by grace, are not foundfault with for calling <strong>the</strong>mselves gods, how can He who hath this by nature deserve <strong>to</strong> be rebuked?”Yet He spake not so, but proved it at a later time, having first relaxed <strong>and</strong> yielded somewhat in Hisdiscourse, <strong>and</strong> said, “Whom <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r hath sanctified <strong>and</strong> sent.” And when He had s<strong>of</strong>tened <strong>the</strong>iranger, He bringeth forward <strong>the</strong> plain asserti<strong>on</strong>. For a while, that His speech might be received, Hespoke in a humbler strain, but afterwards He raised it higher, saying,Ver. 37, 38 . “If I do not <strong>the</strong> works <strong>of</strong> My Fa<strong>the</strong>r, believe Me not; but if I do, though ye believenot Me, believe <strong>the</strong> works.”Seest thou how He proveth what I said, that He is in nothing inferior <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, but in everyway equal <strong>to</strong> Him? For since it was impossible <strong>to</strong> see His Essence, from <strong>the</strong> equality <strong>and</strong> sameness<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> works He affordeth a pro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> unvaryingness as <strong>to</strong> Power. And what, tell me, shall we believe?[3.] “That I am in <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r in Me.” 1652“For I am nothing o<strong>the</strong>r than what <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r is, yet still S<strong>on</strong>; He nothing o<strong>the</strong>r than what I am,yet still Fa<strong>the</strong>r. And if any man know Me, he knoweth <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> if he knoweth <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, 1653he hath learnt also <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>.” Now were <strong>the</strong> power inferior, <strong>the</strong>n also what relateth <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> knowledgewould be false, for it is not possible <strong>to</strong> become acquainted with <strong>on</strong>e substance or power by means<strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r.Ver. 39–41 . “Therefore <strong>the</strong>y sought again <strong>to</strong> take Him, but He escaped out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir h<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong>went away again bey<strong>on</strong>d Jordan, in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> place where <strong>John</strong> at first baptized. 1654 And many resortedun<strong>to</strong> Him, <strong>and</strong> said, <strong>John</strong> did no miracle, but all things that <strong>John</strong> spake <strong>of</strong> this man were true.”When He hath uttered anything great <strong>and</strong> sublime, He quickly retireth, giving way <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>iranger, so that <strong>the</strong> passi<strong>on</strong> may abate <strong>and</strong> cease through His absence. And thus He acted at that time.But wherefore doth <strong>the</strong> Evangelist menti<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> place? That thou mayest learn that He went <strong>the</strong>re<strong>to</strong> remind <strong>the</strong>m <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> things <strong>the</strong>re d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>and</strong> said by <strong>John</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> his testim<strong>on</strong>y; at least when <strong>the</strong>ycame <strong>the</strong>re, <strong>the</strong>y straightway remembered <strong>John</strong>. Wherefore also <strong>the</strong>y said, “<strong>John</strong> indeed did nomiracle,” since how did it follow that <strong>the</strong>y should add this, unless <strong>the</strong> place had brought <strong>the</strong> Baptist<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir memory, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y had come <strong>to</strong> remember his testim<strong>on</strong>y. And observe how <strong>the</strong>y forminc<strong>on</strong>trovertible syllogisms. “<strong>John</strong> indeed did no miracle,” “but this man doth,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e;“hence <strong>the</strong>refore his superiority is shown. If <strong>the</strong>refore men 1655 believed him who did no miracles,much more must <strong>the</strong>y believe this man.” Then, since it was <strong>John</strong> who bore <strong>the</strong> witness, lest his1648Ver. 31, 32 , omitted. “ Then <strong>the</strong> Jews <strong>to</strong>ok up st<strong>on</strong>es again <strong>to</strong> st<strong>on</strong>e Him. Jesus answered <strong>the</strong>m, Many good workshave I showed you from My Fa<strong>the</strong>r; for which <strong>of</strong> those works do ye st<strong>on</strong>e Me? ”1649Ver. 34 , omitted. “ Jesus answered <strong>the</strong>m, Is it not written in your Law, I said, Ye are gods? ”1650“ It called. ”1651“ And <strong>the</strong> Scripture cannot be broken: say ye <strong>of</strong> Him whom <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r hath sanctified <strong>and</strong> sent in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> world, Thoublasphemest, ” &c., N.T. The comment looks as if this had been read.1652“ that ye may know <strong>and</strong> believe that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r is in Me, <strong>and</strong> I in Him, ” N.T.1653Ben. omits, “ if He knoweth <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. ”1654“ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re He abode, ” N.T.1655al. “ we. ”337

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!