12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m217nothing else, but <strong>to</strong> show His unanimity with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>and</strong> if He speaketh in so humble <strong>and</strong> humana way, <strong>the</strong> cause is <strong>the</strong> infirmity <strong>of</strong> His hearers.Ver. 19 . “There was a divisi<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore 1616 am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> Jews. 1617 And some 1618 said, He hatha devil (<strong>and</strong> is mad 1619 ). O<strong>the</strong>rs said, These are not <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> him that hath a devil: can a devilopen <strong>the</strong> eyes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blind?”For because His words were greater than bel<strong>on</strong>ged <strong>to</strong> man, <strong>and</strong> not <strong>of</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> use, <strong>the</strong>y saidthat He had a devil, calling Him so now for <strong>the</strong> fourth time. For <strong>the</strong>y before had said, “Thou hasta devil, who seeketh <strong>to</strong> kill <strong>the</strong>e?” ( c. vii. 20 ); <strong>and</strong> again, “Said we not well that thou art aSamaritan, <strong>and</strong> hast a devil?” ( c. viii. 48 ); <strong>and</strong> here, “He hath a devil <strong>and</strong> is mad, why hear yehim?” Or ra<strong>the</strong>r we should say, that He heard this not for <strong>the</strong> fourth time, but frequently. For <strong>to</strong>ask, “Said we not well that thou hast a devil?” is a sign that <strong>the</strong>y had said so not twice or thrice,but many times. “O<strong>the</strong>rs said, These are not <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> him that hath a devil: can a devil open<strong>the</strong> eyes <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> blind?” For since <strong>the</strong>y could not silence <strong>the</strong>ir opp<strong>on</strong>ents by words, <strong>the</strong>y now broughtpro<strong>of</strong> from His works. “Certainly nei<strong>the</strong>r are <strong>the</strong> words those <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e that hath a devil, yet if ye arenot persuaded by <strong>the</strong> words, be ye shamed by <strong>the</strong> works. For if <strong>the</strong>y are not <strong>the</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e that hatha devil, <strong>and</strong> are greater than bel<strong>on</strong>g <strong>to</strong> man, it is quite clear that <strong>the</strong>y proceed from some divinepower.” Seest thou <strong>the</strong> argument? That <strong>the</strong>y were greater than bel<strong>on</strong>ged <strong>to</strong> man is plain, from <strong>the</strong>Jews saying, “He hath a devil”; that He had not a devil, He showed by what He did.What <strong>the</strong>n did Christ? He answered nothing <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>se things. Before this He had replied, “I havenot a devil”; but not so now; for since He had afforded pro<strong>of</strong> by His acti<strong>on</strong>s, He afterwards heldHis peace. For nei<strong>the</strong>r were <strong>the</strong>y worthy <strong>of</strong> an answer, who said that He was possessed <strong>of</strong> a devil,<strong>on</strong> account <strong>of</strong> those acti<strong>on</strong>s for which <strong>the</strong>y ought <strong>to</strong> have admired <strong>and</strong> deemed Him <strong>to</strong> be God. Andhow were any far<strong>the</strong>r refutati<strong>on</strong>s from Him needed, when <strong>the</strong>y opposed <strong>and</strong> refuted each o<strong>the</strong>r?Wherefore He was silent, <strong>and</strong> bore all mildly. And not for this reas<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>e, but also <strong>to</strong> teach usall meekness <strong>and</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-suffering.[4.] Let us now imitate Him. For not <strong>on</strong>ly did He now hold His peace, but even came am<strong>on</strong>g<strong>the</strong>m again, 1620 <strong>and</strong> being questi<strong>on</strong>ed answered <strong>and</strong> showed <strong>the</strong> things relating <strong>to</strong> His foreknowledge;<strong>and</strong> though called “dem<strong>on</strong>iac” <strong>and</strong> “madman,” by men who had received from Him ten thous<strong>and</strong>benefits, <strong>and</strong> that not <strong>on</strong>ce or twice but many times, not <strong>on</strong>ly did He refrain from avenging Himself,but even ceased not <strong>to</strong> benefit <strong>the</strong>m. To benefit, do I say? He laid down His life for <strong>the</strong>m, <strong>and</strong> whilebeing crucified spake in <strong>the</strong>ir behalf <strong>to</strong> His Fa<strong>the</strong>r. This <strong>the</strong>n let us also imitate, for <strong>to</strong> be a disciple<strong>of</strong> Christ, is <strong>the</strong> being gentle <strong>and</strong> kind. But whence can this gentleness come <strong>to</strong> us? If we c<strong>on</strong>tinuallyreck<strong>on</strong> up our sins, if we mourn, if we weep; for nei<strong>the</strong>r doth a soul that dwelleth in <strong>the</strong> company<strong>of</strong> so much grief endure <strong>to</strong> be provoked or angered. Since wherever <strong>the</strong>re is mourning, it is impossiblethat <strong>the</strong>re should be anger; where grief is, all anger is out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> way; where <strong>the</strong>re is brokenness <strong>of</strong>spirit, <strong>the</strong>re is no provocati<strong>on</strong>. For <strong>the</strong> mind, when scourged by sorrow, hath not leisure <strong>to</strong> be roused,but will groan 1621 bitterly, <strong>and</strong> weep yet more bitterly. I know that many laugh <strong>on</strong> hearing <strong>the</strong>se1616“ <strong>the</strong>refore again, ” N.T.1617“ <strong>the</strong> Jews for <strong>the</strong>se sayings, ” N.T.1618“ many <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m, ” N.T.1619“ is mad, why hear ye him? ” N.T.1620πάλιν ἐπέστη1621al. “ groans. ”329

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!