Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom215account Ezekiel of old rebuked them, and said, “Woe, 1606 ye shepherds of Israel! Do the shepherdsfeed themselves? Do not the shepherds feed the sheep?” ( Ezek. xxxiv. 2 , LXX.) But they did thecontrary, which is the worst kind of wickedness, and the cause of all the rest. Wherefore It saith,“They have not turned back the strayed, nor sought the lost, nor bound up the broken, nor healedthe sick, because they fed themselves and not the sheep.” ( Ezek. xxxiv. 4 .) As Paul also hathdeclared in another passage, saying, “For all seek their own, not the things which are Jesus Christ’s”( Philip. ii. 21 ); and again, “Let no man seek his own, but every man his neighbor’s.” ( 1 Cor. x.24 .) From both Christ distinguisheth Himself; from those who came to spoil, by saying, “I amcome that they might have life, and that they might have more abundantly” ( ver. 10 ); and fromthose who cared not for the sheep being carried away by wolves, by never deserting them, but evenlaying down His life for them, that the sheep might not perish. For when they desired to kill Him,He neither altered His teaching, nor betrayed those who believed on Him, but stood firm, and choseto die. Wherefore He continually said, “I am the good Shepherd.” Then because His words appearedto be unsupported by testimony, (for though the, “I lay down My life,” was not long after proved,yet the, “that they might have life, and that they might have more abundantly,” was to come to passafter their departure hence in the life to come,) what doth He? He proveth one from the other; bygiving His mortal life 1607 (He proveth) that He giveth life immortal. 1608 As Paul also saith, “If whenwe were enemies we were reconciled to God by the death of His Son, much more being reconciledwe shall be saved.” ( Rom. v. 10 .) And again in another place, “He that spared not His own Son,but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things?” ( Rom.viii. 32 .)But wherefore do they not now bring against Him the charge which they did before, when theysaid, “Thou bearest witness of thyself, thy witness is not true?” ( c. viii. 13 .) Because He hadoften stopped their mouths, and because His boldness towards them had been increased by Hismiracles. Then because He said above “And the sheep hear his voice, and follow him,” lest anyshould say, “What then is this to those who believe not?” hear what He addeth, “And I know Mysheep, and am known of Mine.” As Paul declared when he said, “God hath not rejected His peoplewhom He foreknew” ( Rom. xi. 2 ); and Moses, “The Lord knew those that were His” ( 2 Tim.ii. 19; comp. Num. xvi. 5 ); “those,” He saith, “I mean, whom He 1609 foreknew.” Then that thoumayest not deem the measure of knowledge to be equal, hear how He setteth the matter right byadding, “I know My sheep, and am known of Mine.” But the knowledge is not equal. “Where is itequal?” In the case of the Father and Me, for there, “As the Father knoweth Me, even so know Ithe Father.” Had He not wished to prove this, why should He have added that expression? BecauseHe often ranked Himself among the many, therefore, lest any one should deem that He knew as aman knoweth, He added, “As the Father knoweth Me, even so know I the Father.” “I know Himas exactly as He knoweth Me.” Wherefore He said, “No man knoweth the Son 1610 save the Father,nor the Father save the Son” ( Luke x. 22 ), speaking of a distinct kind of knowledge, and suchas no other can possess.1606al. “ O. ”1607ψυχὴν1608ζωὴν1609Ben. “ I. ”1610“ who the Son is, ” &c., N.T.326

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom216[2.] “I lay down My life.” This He saith continually, to show that He is no deceiver. So alsothe Apostle, when he desired to show that he was a genuine teacher, and was arguing against thefalse apostles, established his authority by his dangers and deaths, saying, “In stripes above measure,in deaths oft.” ( 2 Cor. xi. 23 .) For to say, “I am light,” and “I am life,” seemed to the foolish tobe a matter of pride; but to say, “I am willing to die,” admitted not any malice or envy. Whereforethey do not say to Him, “Thou bearest witness of thyself, thy witness is not true,” for the speechmanifested very tender care for them, if indeed He was willing to give Himself for those who wouldhave stoned Him. On this account also He seasonably introduceth mention of the Gentiles;Ver. 16 . “For other sheep also I have,” He saith, “which are not of this fold, them also must Ibring.”Observe again, the word “must,” here used, doth not express necessity, but is declaratory ofsomething which will certainly come to pass. As though He had said, “Why marvel ye if these shallfollow Me, and if My sheep shall hear My voice? When ye shall see others also following Me andhearing My voice, then shall ye be astonished more.” And be not confounded when you hear Himsay, “which are not of this fold” ( Gal. v. 6 ), for the difference relateth to the Law only, as alsoPaul saith, “Neither circumcision availeth anything, nor uncircumcision.”“Them also must I bring.” He showeth that both these and those were scattered and mixed, andwithout shepherds, because the good Shepherd had not yet come. Then He proclaimeth beforehandtheir future union, that,“They shall be one fold.” 1611Which same thing also Paul 1612 declared, saying, “For to make in Himself of twain one newman.” ( Eph. ii. 15 .)Ver. 17 . “Therefore doth My Father love Me, because I lay down My life, that I might take itagain.”What could be more full of humanity than this saying, if so be that on our account our Lordshall be beloved, because He dieth for us? What then? tell me, was He not beloved during the timebefore this; did the Father now begin to love Him, and were we the causes of His love? Seest thouhow He used condescension? But what doth He here desire to prove? Because they said that Hewas alien from the Father, and a deceiver, and had come to ruin and destroy He telleth them, “Thisif nothing else would persuade Me to love you, namely, your being so beloved by the Father, thatI also am beloved by Him, because I die for you.” Besides this He desireth also to prove that otherpoint, that He came not to the action unwillingly, (for it unwillingly, how could what was donecause love?) and that this was especially known to the Father. And if He speaketh as a man, marvelnot, for we have often mentioned the cause of this, and to say again the same things is superfluousand unpleasant.“I lay down My life, that I might take it again.”Ver. 18 . “No man taketh it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it down,and I have power to take it again.”Because they often took counsel to kill Him, He telleth them, “Except I will, your labor isunavailing.” And by the first He proveth the second, by the Death, the Resurrection. For this is thestrange and wonderful thing. Since both took place in a new way, and beyond ordinary custom.1611“ and there shall be one fold, one shepherd, ” N.T.1612al. “ Which Paul also himself. ”327

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m216[2.] “I lay down My life.” This He saith c<strong>on</strong>tinually, <strong>to</strong> show that He is no deceiver. So also<strong>the</strong> Apostle, when he desired <strong>to</strong> show that he was a genuine teacher, <strong>and</strong> was arguing against <strong>the</strong>false apostles, established his authority by his dangers <strong>and</strong> deaths, saying, “In stripes above measure,in deaths <strong>of</strong>t.” ( 2 Cor. xi. 23 .) For <strong>to</strong> say, “I am light,” <strong>and</strong> “I am life,” seemed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> foolish <strong>to</strong>be a matter <strong>of</strong> pride; but <strong>to</strong> say, “I am willing <strong>to</strong> die,” admitted not any malice or envy. Wherefore<strong>the</strong>y do not say <strong>to</strong> Him, “Thou bearest witness <strong>of</strong> thyself, thy witness is not true,” for <strong>the</strong> speechmanifested very tender care for <strong>the</strong>m, if indeed He was willing <strong>to</strong> give Himself for those who wouldhave st<strong>on</strong>ed Him. On this account also He seas<strong>on</strong>ably introduceth menti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gentiles;Ver. 16 . “For o<strong>the</strong>r sheep also I have,” He saith, “which are not <strong>of</strong> this fold, <strong>the</strong>m also must Ibring.”Observe again, <strong>the</strong> word “must,” here used, doth not express necessity, but is declara<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong>something which will certainly come <strong>to</strong> pass. As though He had said, “Why marvel ye if <strong>the</strong>se shallfollow Me, <strong>and</strong> if My sheep shall hear My voice? When ye shall see o<strong>the</strong>rs also following Me <strong>and</strong>hearing My voice, <strong>the</strong>n shall ye be ast<strong>on</strong>ished more.” And be not c<strong>on</strong>founded when you hear Himsay, “which are not <strong>of</strong> this fold” ( Gal. v. 6 ), for <strong>the</strong> difference relateth <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Law <strong>on</strong>ly, as alsoPaul saith, “Nei<strong>the</strong>r circumcisi<strong>on</strong> availeth anything, nor uncircumcisi<strong>on</strong>.”“Them also must I bring.” He showeth that both <strong>the</strong>se <strong>and</strong> those were scattered <strong>and</strong> mixed, <strong>and</strong>without shepherds, because <strong>the</strong> good Shepherd had not yet come. Then He proclaimeth beforeh<strong>and</strong><strong>the</strong>ir future uni<strong>on</strong>, that,“They shall be <strong>on</strong>e fold.” 1611Which same thing also Paul 1612 declared, saying, “For <strong>to</strong> make in Himself <strong>of</strong> twain <strong>on</strong>e newman.” ( Eph. ii. 15 .)Ver. 17 . “Therefore doth My Fa<strong>the</strong>r love Me, because I lay down My life, that I might take itagain.”What could be more full <strong>of</strong> humanity than this saying, if so be that <strong>on</strong> our account our Lordshall be beloved, because He dieth for us? What <strong>the</strong>n? tell me, was He not beloved during <strong>the</strong> timebefore this; did <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r now begin <strong>to</strong> love Him, <strong>and</strong> were we <strong>the</strong> causes <strong>of</strong> His love? Seest thouhow He used c<strong>on</strong>descensi<strong>on</strong>? But what doth He here desire <strong>to</strong> prove? Because <strong>the</strong>y said that Hewas alien from <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> a deceiver, <strong>and</strong> had come <strong>to</strong> ruin <strong>and</strong> destroy He telleth <strong>the</strong>m, “Thisif nothing else would persuade Me <strong>to</strong> love you, namely, your being so beloved by <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, thatI also am beloved by Him, because I die for you.” Besides this He desireth also <strong>to</strong> prove that o<strong>the</strong>rpoint, that He came not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> acti<strong>on</strong> unwillingly, (for it unwillingly, how could what was d<strong>on</strong>ecause love?) <strong>and</strong> that this was especially known <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. And if He speaketh as a man, marvelnot, for we have <strong>of</strong>ten menti<strong>on</strong>ed <strong>the</strong> cause <strong>of</strong> this, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> say again <strong>the</strong> same things is superfluous<strong>and</strong> unpleasant.“I lay down My life, that I might take it again.”Ver. 18 . “No man taketh it from Me, but I lay it down <strong>of</strong> Myself. I have power <strong>to</strong> lay it down,<strong>and</strong> I have power <strong>to</strong> take it again.”Because <strong>the</strong>y <strong>of</strong>ten <strong>to</strong>ok counsel <strong>to</strong> kill Him, He telleth <strong>the</strong>m, “Except I will, your labor isunavailing.” And by <strong>the</strong> first He proveth <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d, by <strong>the</strong> Death, <strong>the</strong> Resurrecti<strong>on</strong>. For this is <strong>the</strong>strange <strong>and</strong> w<strong>on</strong>derful thing. Since both <strong>to</strong>ok place in a new way, <strong>and</strong> bey<strong>on</strong>d ordinary cus<strong>to</strong>m.1611“ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re shall be <strong>on</strong>e fold, <strong>on</strong>e shepherd, ” N.T.1612al. “ Which Paul also himself. ”327

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!