Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomThese, on the other hand, replied weakly, for when they ought to have shown that the Sabbath wasnot broken, they rely only upon the miracles; and with reason, for they still thought that He was aman. If this had not been the case, they might besides have urged in His defense, that He was Lordof the Sabbath which Himself had made, but as yet they had not this opinion. Anyhow, none ofthem dared to say what he wished openly, or in the way of an assertion, but only in the way ofdoubt, some from not having boldness of speech, others through love of rule.“There was therefore a division among them.” This division first began among the people, thenlater among the rulers also, and some said, “He is a good man”; others, “Nay, but he deceiveth thepeople.” ( c. vii. 12 .) Seest thou that the rulers were more void of understanding than the many,since they were divided later than they? and after they were divided, they did not exhibit any noblefeeling, when they saw the Pharisees pressing upon them. Since had they been entirely separatedfrom them, they would soon have known the truth. For it is possible to do well in separating.Wherefore also Himself hath said, “I am come not to bring peace upon the earth but a sword.” (Matt. x. 34 .) For there is an evil concord, and there is a good disagreement. Thus they who builtthe tower ( Gen. xi. 4 ), agreed together to their own hurt; and these same again were separated,though unwillingly, yet for their good. Thus also Corah and his company agreed together for evil,therefore they were separated for good; and Judas agreed with the Jews for evil. So division maybe good, and agreement may be evil. Wherefore It saith, “If thine eye offend thee, smite it out, 1531if thy foot, cut it off.” ( Matt. v. 29, and xviii. 8 .) Now if we must separate ourselves from anill-joined limb, must we not much more from friends united to us for evil 1532 ? So that agreementis not in all cases a good, just as division is not in all cases an evil.[3.] These things I say, that we may shun wicked men, and follow the good; for if in the caseof our limbs we cut off that which is rotten and incurable, fearing lest the rest of the body shouldcatch the same disease, and if we do this not as having no care for that part, but rather as desiringto preserve the remainder, how much more must we do this in the case of those who consent withus for evil? If we can set them right without receiving injury ourselves, we ought to use every meansto do so; but if they remain incorrigible and may injure us, it is necessary to cut them off and castthem away. For so they will often be 1533 gainers rather (than losers). Wherefore also Paul exhorted,saying, “And ye shall put away from among yourselves that wicked person”; and, “that he that hathdone this deed may be put away from among you.” ( 1 Cor. v. 13, 2 .) A dreadful thing, dreadfulindeed, is the society of wicked men; not so quickly doth the pestilence seize or the itch infect thosethat come in contact with such as are under the disease, as doth the wickedness of evil men. For“evil communications corrupt good manners.” ( 1 Cor. xv. 33 .) And again the Prophet saith,“Come out from among them, and be ye separate.” ( Isa. lii. 11 .) Let no one then have a wickedman for his friend. For if when we have bad sons we publicly disclaim them, without regardingnature or its laws, or the constraint which it lays upon us, much more ought we to fly from ourcompanions and acquaintances when they are wicked. Because even if we receive no injury fromthem, we shall anyhow not be able to escape ill report, for strangers search not into our lives, butjudge us from our companions. This advice I address to young men and maidens. “Providing,” 15341531“ pluck it out, ” N.T.1532κακῶς ἡνωμένων1533al. “ often are. ”1534“ provide, ” N.T.310

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom205It saith, “things honest,” not only in the sight of the Lord, but also “in the sight of all men.” ( Rom.xii. 17 .) Let us then use every means that our neighbor be not offended. For a life, though it bevery upright, if it offend others hath lost all. But how is it possible for the life that is upright tooffend? When the society of those that are not upright invests it with an evil reputation; for when,trusting in ourselves, we consort with bad men, even though we be not harmed, we offend others.These things I say to men and women and maidens, leaving it to their conscience to see exactlyhow many evils are produced from this source. Neither I, perhaps, nor any of the more perfect,suspect any ill; but the simpler brother is harmed by occasion of thy perfection; and thou oughtestto be careful also for his infirmity. And even if he receive no injury, yet the Greek is harmed. NowPaul biddeth us be “without offense, both to Jews and Greeks, and to the Church of God.” ( 1 Cor.x. 32 .) (I think no evil of the virgin, for I love virginity, and “love thinketh no evil” ( 1 Cor. xiii.5 ); I am a great admirer of that state of life, 1535 and I cannot have so much as an unseemly thoughtabout it.) How shall we per suade those that are without? For we must take forethought for themalso. Let us then so order what relates to ourselves, that none of the unbelievers may be able evento find a just handle of accusation against us. For as they who show forth a right life glorify God,so they who do the contrary cause Him to be blasphemed. May no such persons be among 1536 us:but may our works so shine, that our Father which is in Heaven may be glorified, and that we mayenjoy the honor which is from Him. To which may we all attain, through the grace andlovingkindness of our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom and with whom, to the Father and the HolyGhost, be glory forever and ever. Amen.Homily LVIII.John ix. 17, 18“They say unto the blind man again, What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes? Hesaid, He is a Prophet. The Jews then did not believe.”[1.] We must go over the Scriptures not in a chance way or carelessly, but with all exactness,that we be not entangled. Since even now in this place one might with show of reason question,how, when they had asserted, “This man is not of God, because he keepeth not the Sabbath,” theynow say to the man, “What sayest thou of him, that he hath opened thine eyes?” and not, “Whatsayest thou of him, that he hath broken the Sabbath?” but put now that which was the ground ofthe defense, not that of the accusation. What then have we to reply? That these (who speak) are notthe men who said, “This man is not of God,” but those who separated themselves from them, whoalso said, “A man that is a sinner cannot 1537 do such miracles.” For desiring to silence their opponents1535πολιτείας1536Morel. “ from among. ”1537“ How can a man, ” &c., N.T.311

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m205It saith, “things h<strong>on</strong>est,” not <strong>on</strong>ly in <strong>the</strong> sight <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord, but also “in <strong>the</strong> sight <strong>of</strong> all men.” ( Rom.xii. 17 .) Let us <strong>the</strong>n use every means that our neighbor be not <strong>of</strong>fended. For a life, though it bevery upright, if it <strong>of</strong>fend o<strong>the</strong>rs hath lost all. But how is it possible for <strong>the</strong> life that is upright <strong>to</strong><strong>of</strong>fend? When <strong>the</strong> society <strong>of</strong> those that are not upright invests it with an evil reputati<strong>on</strong>; for when,trusting in ourselves, we c<strong>on</strong>sort with bad men, even though we be not harmed, we <strong>of</strong>fend o<strong>the</strong>rs.These things I say <strong>to</strong> men <strong>and</strong> women <strong>and</strong> maidens, leaving it <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir c<strong>on</strong>science <strong>to</strong> see exactlyhow many evils are produced from this source. Nei<strong>the</strong>r I, perhaps, nor any <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> more perfect,suspect any ill; but <strong>the</strong> simpler bro<strong>the</strong>r is harmed by occasi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> thy perfecti<strong>on</strong>; <strong>and</strong> thou oughtest<strong>to</strong> be careful also for his infirmity. And even if he receive no injury, yet <strong>the</strong> Greek is harmed. NowPaul biddeth us be “without <strong>of</strong>fense, both <strong>to</strong> Jews <strong>and</strong> Greeks, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Church <strong>of</strong> God.” ( 1 Cor.x. 32 .) (I think no evil <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> virgin, for I love virginity, <strong>and</strong> “love thinketh no evil” ( 1 Cor. xiii.5 ); I am a great admirer <strong>of</strong> that state <strong>of</strong> life, 1535 <strong>and</strong> I cannot have so much as an unseemly thoughtabout it.) How shall we per suade those that are without? For we must take forethought for <strong>the</strong>malso. Let us <strong>the</strong>n so order what relates <strong>to</strong> ourselves, that n<strong>on</strong>e <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> unbelievers may be able even<strong>to</strong> find a just h<strong>and</strong>le <strong>of</strong> accusati<strong>on</strong> against us. For as <strong>the</strong>y who show forth a right life glorify God,so <strong>the</strong>y who do <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>trary cause Him <strong>to</strong> be blasphemed. May no such pers<strong>on</strong>s be am<strong>on</strong>g 1536 us:but may our works so shine, that our Fa<strong>the</strong>r which is in Heaven may be glorified, <strong>and</strong> that we mayenjoy <strong>the</strong> h<strong>on</strong>or which is from Him. To which may we all attain, through <strong>the</strong> grace <strong>and</strong>lovingkindness <strong>of</strong> our Lord Jesus Christ, by whom <strong>and</strong> with whom, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> HolyGhost, be glory forever <strong>and</strong> ever. Amen.Homily LVIII.<strong>John</strong> ix. 17, 18“They say un<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> blind man again, What sayest thou <strong>of</strong> him, that he hath opened thine eyes? Hesaid, He is a Prophet. The Jews <strong>the</strong>n did not believe.”[1.] We must go over <strong>the</strong> Scriptures not in a chance way or carelessly, but with all exactness,that we be not entangled. Since even now in this place <strong>on</strong>e might with show <strong>of</strong> reas<strong>on</strong> questi<strong>on</strong>,how, when <strong>the</strong>y had asserted, “This man is not <strong>of</strong> God, because he keepeth not <strong>the</strong> Sabbath,” <strong>the</strong>ynow say <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> man, “What sayest thou <strong>of</strong> him, that he hath opened thine eyes?” <strong>and</strong> not, “Whatsayest thou <strong>of</strong> him, that he hath broken <strong>the</strong> Sabbath?” but put now that which was <strong>the</strong> ground <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> defense, not that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> accusati<strong>on</strong>. What <strong>the</strong>n have we <strong>to</strong> reply? That <strong>the</strong>se (who speak) are not<strong>the</strong> men who said, “This man is not <strong>of</strong> God,” but those who separated <strong>the</strong>mselves from <strong>the</strong>m, whoalso said, “A man that is a sinner cannot 1537 do such miracles.” For desiring <strong>to</strong> silence <strong>the</strong>ir opp<strong>on</strong>ents1535πολιτείας1536Morel. “ from am<strong>on</strong>g. ”1537“ How can a man, ” &c., N.T.311

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!