Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom192and join me, as by a nail riveted into me.” For as men of this kind are hard to be captured, so theopposite sort are a ready prey, and are easily thrown down. As was the case of the Jews at that time;for after having heard and believed, they again turned out of the way. Christ therefore desiring todeepen their faith that it might not be merely superficial, diggeth into their souls by more strikingwords. For it was the part of believers to endure even reproofs, but they immediately were wroth.But how doth He this? He first telleth them, “If ye continue in My word, ye are My disciples indeed:and the truth shall make you free.” All but saying, “I am about to make a deep incision, but be notye moved”; or rather by these expressions He allayed the pride of their imagination. “Shall makeyou free”: from what, tell me? From your sins. What then say those boasters?Ver. 33 . “We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man.”Immediately their imagination dropped, and this happened from their having been fluttered 1469about worldly things. “If ye continue in My word,” was the expression of One declaring what wasin their heart, and knowing that they had indeed believed, but had not continued. And He promisetha great thing, that they should become His disciples. For since some had gone away from Himbefore this, alluding to them He saith, “If ye continue,” because they also had heard and believed,and departed because they could not continue. “For many of His disciples went back, and walkedno more openly with Him.” 1470 ( c. vi. 66 .)“Ye shall know the truth,” that is, “shall know Me, for I am the truth. All the Jewish matterswere types, but ye shall know the truth from Me, and it shall free you from your sins.” As to thoseothers He said, “Ye shall die in your sins,” so to these He saith, “shall make you free.” He said not,“I will deliver you from bondage,” this He allowed them to conjecture. What then said they?“We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man.” And yet if they must needshave been vexed, it might have been expected that they would have been so at the former part ofHis speech, at His having said, “Ye shall know the truth”; and that they would have replied, “What!do we not now know the truth? Is then the Law and our knowledge a lie?” But they cared for noneof these things, they are grieved at worldly things, and these were their notions of bondage. Andcertainly even now, there are many who feel shame at indifferent matters, and at this kind ofbondage, but who feel none for the bondage of sin, and who would rather be called servants to thislatter kind of bondage ten thousand times, than once to the former. Such were these men, and theydid not even know of any other bondage, and they say, “Bondsmen callest thou those who are ofthe race of Abraham, the nobly born, who therefore ought not to be called bondsmen? For, saithone, we were never in bondage to any man.” Such are the boastings of the Jews. “We are the seedof Abraham,” “we are Israelites.” They never mention their own righteous deeds. Wherefore Johncried out to them, saying, “Think not to say that we have Abraham to our father.” ( Matt. iii. 9 .)And why did not Christ confute them, for they had often been in bondage to the Egyptians,Babylonians, and many others? Because His words were not to gain honor for Himself, but fortheir salvation, for their benefit, and toward this object He was pressing. For He might have spokenof the four hundred years, He might have spoken of the seventy, He might have spoken of the yearsof bondage during the time of the Judges, at one time twenty, at another two, at another seven; Hemight have said that they had never ceased being in bondage. But He desired not to show that they1469ἐ πτοῆσθαι1470some omit “ openly. ”292

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomwere slaves of men, but that they were slaves of sin, which is the most grievous slavery, from whichGod alone can deliver; for to forgive sins belongeth to none other. And this too they allowed. Sincethen they confessed that this was the work of God, He bringeth them to this point, and saith,Ver. 34 . “Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin.”Showing that this is the freedom of which He speaketh, the freedom from this service.Ver. 35 . “The servant abideth not in the house, but the Son abideth forever.”Gently too from this He casts down the things of the Law, 1471 alluding to former times. For thatthey may not run back to them and say, “We have the sacrifices which Moses commanded, theyare able to deliver us,” He addeth these words, since otherwise what connection would the sayinghave? For “all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God, being justified freely by His grace”( Rom. iii. 23, 24 ), even the priests themselves. Wherefore Paul also saith of the priest, that “heought as for the people so also for himself to offer for sins, for that he also is compassed about withinfirmity.” ( Heb. v. 3, 2 .) And this is signified by His saying, “The servant abideth not in thehouse.” Here also He showeth His equal honor with the Father, and the difference between slaveand free. For the parable has this meaning, that is, “the servant hath no power,” this is the meaningof “abideth not.”[2.] But why when speaking of sins doth He mention a “house”? It is to show that as a masterhath power over his house, so He over all. And the, “abideth not,” is this,“ hath not power to grantfavors, as not being master of the house”; but the Son is master of the house. For this is the, “abidethforever,” by a metaphor drawn from human things. That they may not say, “who art thou?” “All isMine, (He saith,) for I am the Son, and dwell in My Father’s house,” calling by the name of “house”His power. As in another place He calleth the Kingdom His Father’s house, “In My Father’s houseare many mansions.” ( c. xiv. 2 .) For since the discourse was of freedom and bondage, He withreason used this metaphor, telling them that they had no power to set free. 1472Ver. 36 . “If the Son therefore shall make you free.”Seest thou the consubstantiality of the Son with the Father, and how He declareth that He haththe same power as the Father? “If the Son make you free, no man afterwards gain-sayeth, but yehave firm freedom.” For “it is God that justifieth, who is He that condemneth?” ( Rom. viii. 33,34 .) Here He showeth that He Himself is pure from sin, and alludeth to that freedom which reachedonly to a name; this even men give, but that God alone. And so he persuaded them not to be ashamedat this slavery, but at that of sin. And desiring to show that they were not slaves, except by repudiatingthat liberty, He the more showeth them to be slaves by saying, 1473“Ye shall be free indeed.”This is the expression of one declaring that this freedom was not real. Then, that they mightnot say, “We have no sin,” (for it was probable that they would say so,) observe how He bringeththem beneath this imputation. For omitting to convict all their life, He bringeth forward that whichthey had in hand, which they yet desired to do, and saith,Ver. 37 . “I know that ye are Abraham’s seed but ye seek to kill Me.”1471Sav. “ Gently and by help of the Law He casts them down. ”1472or, “ forgive. ”1473This reading is from a Vatican ms. which has εἰ μὴ . Savile’s is not grammatical. Ben. reads, “ Then desiring to showthat if they were not slaves, by repudiating that former slavery they were slaves the more, He straightway added. ”293

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>mwere slaves <strong>of</strong> men, but that <strong>the</strong>y were slaves <strong>of</strong> sin, which is <strong>the</strong> most grievous slavery, from whichGod al<strong>on</strong>e can deliver; for <strong>to</strong> forgive sins bel<strong>on</strong>geth <strong>to</strong> n<strong>on</strong>e o<strong>the</strong>r. And this <strong>to</strong>o <strong>the</strong>y allowed. Since<strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong>y c<strong>on</strong>fessed that this was <strong>the</strong> work <strong>of</strong> God, He bringeth <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> this point, <strong>and</strong> saith,Ver. 34 . “Whosoever committeth sin is <strong>the</strong> servant <strong>of</strong> sin.”Showing that this is <strong>the</strong> freedom <strong>of</strong> which He speaketh, <strong>the</strong> freedom from this service.Ver. 35 . “The servant abideth not in <strong>the</strong> house, but <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> abideth forever.”Gently <strong>to</strong>o from this He casts down <strong>the</strong> things <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Law, 1471 alluding <strong>to</strong> former times. For that<strong>the</strong>y may not run back <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong> say, “We have <strong>the</strong> sacrifices which Moses comm<strong>and</strong>ed, <strong>the</strong>yare able <strong>to</strong> deliver us,” He addeth <strong>the</strong>se words, since o<strong>the</strong>rwise what c<strong>on</strong>necti<strong>on</strong> would <strong>the</strong> sayinghave? For “all have sinned, <strong>and</strong> come short <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> glory <strong>of</strong> God, being justified freely by His grace”( Rom. iii. 23, 24 ), even <strong>the</strong> priests <strong>the</strong>mselves. Wherefore Paul also saith <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> priest, that “heought as for <strong>the</strong> people so also for himself <strong>to</strong> <strong>of</strong>fer for sins, for that he also is compassed about withinfirmity.” ( Heb. v. 3, 2 .) And this is signified by His saying, “The servant abideth not in <strong>the</strong>house.” Here also He showeth His equal h<strong>on</strong>or with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> difference between slave<strong>and</strong> free. For <strong>the</strong> parable has this meaning, that is, “<strong>the</strong> servant hath no power,” this is <strong>the</strong> meaning<strong>of</strong> “abideth not.”[2.] But why when speaking <strong>of</strong> sins doth He menti<strong>on</strong> a “house”? It is <strong>to</strong> show that as a masterhath power over his house, so He over all. And <strong>the</strong>, “abideth not,” is this,“ hath not power <strong>to</strong> grantfavors, as not being master <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> house”; but <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> is master <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> house. For this is <strong>the</strong>, “abidethforever,” by a metaphor drawn from human things. That <strong>the</strong>y may not say, “who art thou?” “All isMine, (He saith,) for I am <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> dwell in My Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s house,” calling by <strong>the</strong> name <strong>of</strong> “house”His power. As in ano<strong>the</strong>r place He calleth <strong>the</strong> Kingdom His Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s house, “In My Fa<strong>the</strong>r’s houseare many mansi<strong>on</strong>s.” ( c. xiv. 2 .) For since <strong>the</strong> discourse was <strong>of</strong> freedom <strong>and</strong> b<strong>on</strong>dage, He withreas<strong>on</strong> used this metaphor, telling <strong>the</strong>m that <strong>the</strong>y had no power <strong>to</strong> set free. 1472Ver. 36 . “If <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore shall make you free.”Seest thou <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>substantiality <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>and</strong> how He declareth that He hath<strong>the</strong> same power as <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r? “If <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> make you free, no man afterwards gain-sayeth, but yehave firm freedom.” For “it is God that justifieth, who is He that c<strong>on</strong>demneth?” ( Rom. viii. 33,34 .) Here He showeth that He Himself is pure from sin, <strong>and</strong> alludeth <strong>to</strong> that freedom which reached<strong>on</strong>ly <strong>to</strong> a name; this even men give, but that God al<strong>on</strong>e. And so he persuaded <strong>the</strong>m not <strong>to</strong> be ashamedat this slavery, but at that <strong>of</strong> sin. And desiring <strong>to</strong> show that <strong>the</strong>y were not slaves, except by repudiatingthat liberty, He <strong>the</strong> more showeth <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> be slaves by saying, 1473“Ye shall be free indeed.”This is <strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>on</strong>e declaring that this freedom was not real. Then, that <strong>the</strong>y mightnot say, “We have no sin,” (for it was probable that <strong>the</strong>y would say so,) observe how He bringeth<strong>the</strong>m beneath this imputati<strong>on</strong>. For omitting <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>vict all <strong>the</strong>ir life, He bringeth forward that which<strong>the</strong>y had in h<strong>and</strong>, which <strong>the</strong>y yet desired <strong>to</strong> do, <strong>and</strong> saith,Ver. 37 . “I know that ye are Abraham’s seed but ye seek <strong>to</strong> kill Me.”1471Sav. “ Gently <strong>and</strong> by help <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Law He casts <strong>the</strong>m down. ”1472or, “ forgive. ”1473This reading is from a Vatican ms. which has εἰ μὴ . Savile’s is not grammatical. Ben. reads, “ Then desiring <strong>to</strong> showthat if <strong>the</strong>y were not slaves, by repudiating that former slavery <strong>the</strong>y were slaves <strong>the</strong> more, He straightway added. ”293

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!