Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom186this erroneous suspicion, and to show that He was not one of the prophets, but the Master of theworld, He said,Chap. viii. ver. 12 . 1452 “I am the light of the world.”Not “of Galilee,” not of Palestine, nor of Judæa. What then say the Jews?Ver. 13 . “Thou bearest record of thyself, thy record is not true.”Alas! for their folly, He continually referred them to the Scriptures, and now they say, “Thoubearest record of thyself.” What was the record He bare? “I am the light of the world.” A greatthing to say, great of a truth, but it did not greatly amaze them, because He did not now makeHimself equal to the Father, nor assert that He was His Son, nor that He was God, but for a whilecalleth Himself “a light.” They indeed desired to disprove this also, and yet this was a much greaterthing than to say,“He that followeth Me, shall not walk in darkness.”Using the words “light” and “darkness” in a spiritual sense, and meaning thereby “abideth notin error.” In this place He draweth on Nicodemus, and bringeth him in as having spoken veryboldly, and praiseth the servants who had also done so. For to “cry aloud,” 1453 is the act of onedesirous to cause that they also should hear. At the same time He hinteth at these 1454 who weresecretly contriving treacheries, being both in darkness and error, but that they should not prevailover the light. And He remindeth Nicodemus of the words which He had uttered before, “Everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.”( c. iii. 20 .) For since they had asserted that none of the rulers had believed on Him, therefore Hesaith, that “he that doeth evil cometh not to the light,” to show that their not having come proceedethnot from the weakness of the light, but from their own perverse will.“They answered and said unto Him, Dost thou bear witness to thyself?”What then saith He?Ver. 14 . “Though I bear record of Myself, My record is true; for I know whence I come, andwhither I go; but ye cannot tell whence I come.”What He had before said, 1455 these men bring forward as if it had been specially 1456 asserted.What then doth Christ? To refute this, and to show that He used those expressions as suitable tothem and to their suspicions, who supposed Him to be a mere man, He saith, “Though I bear recordof Myself, My record is true, for I know whence I come.” What is this? “I am of God, am God, theSon of God, and God Himself is a faithful witness unto Himself, but ye know Him not; ye willinglyerr, 1457 knowing ye pretend not to know, but say all that ye say according to mere human imagination,choosing to understand nothing beyond what is seen.”Ver. 15 . “Ye judge after the flesh.”As to live after the flesh is to live badly, so to judge after the flesh is to judge unjustly. “But Ijudge no man.”Ver. 16 . “And yet if I judge, My judgment is true.” 14581452The history of the woman taken in adultery is omitted by St. Chrysostom, and all the Greek commentators.1453S. C. seems to refer to c. vii. 28 . “ Then cried Jesus in the Temple, ” &c.1454i.e. the Pharisees.1455῞ Οπερ φθάσας εἶπε , according to Savile’s conjecture and a Vatican ms. The common reading is εἶπον1456προηγουμένως1457ἐ θελοκακεῖτε1458Ben. “ just. ”284

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom187What He saith, is of this kind; “Ye judge unjustly.” “And if,” saith some one, “we judge unjustly,why dost Thou not rebuke us? why dost Thou not punish us? why dost Thou not condemn us?”“Because,” He saith, “I came not for this.” This is the meaning of, “I judge no man; yet if I judge,My judgment is true.” “For had I been willing to judge, ye would have been among the condemned.And this I say, not judging you. Yet neither do I tell you that I say it, not judging you, as though Iwere not confident that had I judged you, I should have convicted you; since if I had judged you,I must justly have condemned you. But now the time of judgment is not yet.” He alluded also tothe judgment to come, saying,“I am not alone, but I and the Father that sent Me.”Here He hinted, that not He alone condemneth them, but the Father also. Then He concealedthis, by leading them to His own testimony.Ver. 17 . “It is written in your Law, that the testimony of two men is true.”[3.] What would the heretics say here? (They would say,) “How is he better than man, if wetake what he hath said simply? For this rule is laid down in the case of men, because no man byhimself is trustworthy. But in the case of God, how can one endure such a mode of speaking? Howthen is the word ‘two’ used? Is it because they are two, or because being men they are thereforetwo? If it is because they are two, why did he not betake himself to John, and say, I bear witnessof myself, and John beareth witness of me? Wherefore not to the angels? Wherefore not to theprophets? For he might have found ten thousand other testimonies.” But he desireth to show notthis only that there are Two, but also that they are of the same Substance.Ver. 19 . “Then said they unto Him, Who is thy father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know Me,nor My Father.”Because while they knew they spake as though they knew not, and as if trying Him, He dothnot even deem them worthy of an answer. Wherefore henceforth He speaketh all more clearly andmore boldly; drawing His testimony from signs, and from His teaching of them that followed Him,and 1459 by the Cross being near. For, “I know,” He saith, “whence I come.” This would not greatlyaffect them, but the adding, “and whither I go,” would rather terrify them, since He was not toremain in death. But why said He not, “I know that I am God,” instead of, “I know whence I come”?He ever mingleth lowly words with sublime, and even these He veileth. For after saying, “I bearwitness of Myself,” and proving this, He descendeth to a humbler strain. As though He had said,“I know from whom I am sent, and to whom I depart.” For so they could have had nothing to sayagainst it, when they heard that He was sent from Him, and would depart to Him. “I could not havespoken,” He saith, “any falsehood, I who am come from thence, and depart thither, to the true God.But ye know not God, and therefore judge according to the flesh. For if having heard so many suresigns and proofs ye still say, ‘thy witness is not true,’ if ye deem Moses worthy of credit, both asto what he speaketh concerning others and what he speaketh concerning himself, but Christ not so,this is to judge according to the flesh.” “But I judge no man.” He saith indeed also that “the Fatherjudgeth no man.” ( c. v. 22 .) How then doth He here declare, that, “If I judge, My judgment isjust, for I am not alone”? He again speaketh in reply to their thoughts. “The judgment which isMine is the judgment of the Father. The Father, judging, would not judge otherwise than as I do,and I should not judge otherwise than as the Father.” Wherefore did He mention the Father? Becausethey would not have thought that the Son was to be believed unless He received the witness of the1459Ben. omits “ and. ”285

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m187What He saith, is <strong>of</strong> this kind; “Ye judge unjustly.” “And if,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e, “we judge unjustly,why dost Thou not rebuke us? why dost Thou not punish us? why dost Thou not c<strong>on</strong>demn us?”“Because,” He saith, “I came not for this.” This is <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong>, “I judge no man; yet if I judge,My judgment is true.” “For had I been willing <strong>to</strong> judge, ye would have been am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>demned.And this I say, not judging you. Yet nei<strong>the</strong>r do I tell you that I say it, not judging you, as though Iwere not c<strong>on</strong>fident that had I judged you, I should have c<strong>on</strong>victed you; since if I had judged you,I must justly have c<strong>on</strong>demned you. But now <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> judgment is not yet.” He alluded also <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>to</strong> come, saying,“I am not al<strong>on</strong>e, but I <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r that sent Me.”Here He hinted, that not He al<strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>demneth <strong>the</strong>m, but <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r also. Then He c<strong>on</strong>cealedthis, by leading <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> His own testim<strong>on</strong>y.Ver. 17 . “It is written in your Law, that <strong>the</strong> testim<strong>on</strong>y <strong>of</strong> two men is true.”[3.] What would <strong>the</strong> heretics say here? (They would say,) “How is he better than man, if wetake what he hath said simply? For this rule is laid down in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> men, because no man byhimself is trustworthy. But in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> God, how can <strong>on</strong>e endure such a mode <strong>of</strong> speaking? How<strong>the</strong>n is <strong>the</strong> word ‘two’ used? Is it because <strong>the</strong>y are two, or because being men <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong>reforetwo? If it is because <strong>the</strong>y are two, why did he not betake himself <strong>to</strong> <strong>John</strong>, <strong>and</strong> say, I bear witness<strong>of</strong> myself, <strong>and</strong> <strong>John</strong> beareth witness <strong>of</strong> me? Wherefore not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> angels? Wherefore not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>prophets? For he might have found ten thous<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r testim<strong>on</strong>ies.” But he desireth <strong>to</strong> show notthis <strong>on</strong>ly that <strong>the</strong>re are Two, but also that <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same Substance.Ver. 19 . “Then said <strong>the</strong>y un<strong>to</strong> Him, Who is thy fa<strong>the</strong>r? Jesus answered, Ye nei<strong>the</strong>r know Me,nor My Fa<strong>the</strong>r.”Because while <strong>the</strong>y knew <strong>the</strong>y spake as though <strong>the</strong>y knew not, <strong>and</strong> as if trying Him, He dothnot even deem <strong>the</strong>m worthy <strong>of</strong> an answer. Wherefore henceforth He speaketh all more clearly <strong>and</strong>more boldly; drawing His testim<strong>on</strong>y from signs, <strong>and</strong> from His teaching <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m that followed Him,<strong>and</strong> 1459 by <strong>the</strong> Cross being near. For, “I know,” He saith, “whence I come.” This would not greatlyaffect <strong>the</strong>m, but <strong>the</strong> adding, “<strong>and</strong> whi<strong>the</strong>r I go,” would ra<strong>the</strong>r terrify <strong>the</strong>m, since He was not <strong>to</strong>remain in death. But why said He not, “I know that I am God,” instead <strong>of</strong>, “I know whence I come”?He ever mingleth lowly words with sublime, <strong>and</strong> even <strong>the</strong>se He veileth. For after saying, “I bearwitness <strong>of</strong> Myself,” <strong>and</strong> proving this, He descendeth <strong>to</strong> a humbler strain. As though He had said,“I know from whom I am sent, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> whom I depart.” For so <strong>the</strong>y could have had nothing <strong>to</strong> sayagainst it, when <strong>the</strong>y heard that He was sent from Him, <strong>and</strong> would depart <strong>to</strong> Him. “I could not havespoken,” He saith, “any falsehood, I who am come from <strong>the</strong>nce, <strong>and</strong> depart thi<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> true God.But ye know not God, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore judge according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh. For if having heard so many suresigns <strong>and</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>s ye still say, ‘thy witness is not true,’ if ye deem Moses worthy <strong>of</strong> credit, both as<strong>to</strong> what he speaketh c<strong>on</strong>cerning o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> what he speaketh c<strong>on</strong>cerning himself, but Christ not so,this is <strong>to</strong> judge according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh.” “But I judge no man.” He saith indeed also that “<strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>rjudgeth no man.” ( c. v. 22 .) How <strong>the</strong>n doth He here declare, that, “If I judge, My judgment isjust, for I am not al<strong>on</strong>e”? He again speaketh in reply <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir thoughts. “The judgment which isMine is <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. The Fa<strong>the</strong>r, judging, would not judge o<strong>the</strong>rwise than as I do,<strong>and</strong> I should not judge o<strong>the</strong>rwise than as <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r.” Wherefore did He menti<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r? Because<strong>the</strong>y would not have thought that <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> was <strong>to</strong> be believed unless He received <strong>the</strong> witness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>1459Ben. omits “ <strong>and</strong>. ”285

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!