Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews
Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews
NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom186this erroneous suspicion, and to show that He was not one of the prophets, but the Master of theworld, He said,Chap. viii. ver. 12 . 1452 “I am the light of the world.”Not “of Galilee,” not of Palestine, nor of Judæa. What then say the Jews?Ver. 13 . “Thou bearest record of thyself, thy record is not true.”Alas! for their folly, He continually referred them to the Scriptures, and now they say, “Thoubearest record of thyself.” What was the record He bare? “I am the light of the world.” A greatthing to say, great of a truth, but it did not greatly amaze them, because He did not now makeHimself equal to the Father, nor assert that He was His Son, nor that He was God, but for a whilecalleth Himself “a light.” They indeed desired to disprove this also, and yet this was a much greaterthing than to say,“He that followeth Me, shall not walk in darkness.”Using the words “light” and “darkness” in a spiritual sense, and meaning thereby “abideth notin error.” In this place He draweth on Nicodemus, and bringeth him in as having spoken veryboldly, and praiseth the servants who had also done so. For to “cry aloud,” 1453 is the act of onedesirous to cause that they also should hear. At the same time He hinteth at these 1454 who weresecretly contriving treacheries, being both in darkness and error, but that they should not prevailover the light. And He remindeth Nicodemus of the words which He had uttered before, “Everyone that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.”( c. iii. 20 .) For since they had asserted that none of the rulers had believed on Him, therefore Hesaith, that “he that doeth evil cometh not to the light,” to show that their not having come proceedethnot from the weakness of the light, but from their own perverse will.“They answered and said unto Him, Dost thou bear witness to thyself?”What then saith He?Ver. 14 . “Though I bear record of Myself, My record is true; for I know whence I come, andwhither I go; but ye cannot tell whence I come.”What He had before said, 1455 these men bring forward as if it had been specially 1456 asserted.What then doth Christ? To refute this, and to show that He used those expressions as suitable tothem and to their suspicions, who supposed Him to be a mere man, He saith, “Though I bear recordof Myself, My record is true, for I know whence I come.” What is this? “I am of God, am God, theSon of God, and God Himself is a faithful witness unto Himself, but ye know Him not; ye willinglyerr, 1457 knowing ye pretend not to know, but say all that ye say according to mere human imagination,choosing to understand nothing beyond what is seen.”Ver. 15 . “Ye judge after the flesh.”As to live after the flesh is to live badly, so to judge after the flesh is to judge unjustly. “But Ijudge no man.”Ver. 16 . “And yet if I judge, My judgment is true.” 14581452The history of the woman taken in adultery is omitted by St. Chrysostom, and all the Greek commentators.1453S. C. seems to refer to c. vii. 28 . “ Then cried Jesus in the Temple, ” &c.1454i.e. the Pharisees.1455῞ Οπερ φθάσας εἶπε , according to Savile’s conjecture and a Vatican ms. The common reading is εἶπον1456προηγουμένως1457ἐ θελοκακεῖτε1458Ben. “ just. ”284
NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom187What He saith, is of this kind; “Ye judge unjustly.” “And if,” saith some one, “we judge unjustly,why dost Thou not rebuke us? why dost Thou not punish us? why dost Thou not condemn us?”“Because,” He saith, “I came not for this.” This is the meaning of, “I judge no man; yet if I judge,My judgment is true.” “For had I been willing to judge, ye would have been among the condemned.And this I say, not judging you. Yet neither do I tell you that I say it, not judging you, as though Iwere not confident that had I judged you, I should have convicted you; since if I had judged you,I must justly have condemned you. But now the time of judgment is not yet.” He alluded also tothe judgment to come, saying,“I am not alone, but I and the Father that sent Me.”Here He hinted, that not He alone condemneth them, but the Father also. Then He concealedthis, by leading them to His own testimony.Ver. 17 . “It is written in your Law, that the testimony of two men is true.”[3.] What would the heretics say here? (They would say,) “How is he better than man, if wetake what he hath said simply? For this rule is laid down in the case of men, because no man byhimself is trustworthy. But in the case of God, how can one endure such a mode of speaking? Howthen is the word ‘two’ used? Is it because they are two, or because being men they are thereforetwo? If it is because they are two, why did he not betake himself to John, and say, I bear witnessof myself, and John beareth witness of me? Wherefore not to the angels? Wherefore not to theprophets? For he might have found ten thousand other testimonies.” But he desireth to show notthis only that there are Two, but also that they are of the same Substance.Ver. 19 . “Then said they unto Him, Who is thy father? Jesus answered, Ye neither know Me,nor My Father.”Because while they knew they spake as though they knew not, and as if trying Him, He dothnot even deem them worthy of an answer. Wherefore henceforth He speaketh all more clearly andmore boldly; drawing His testimony from signs, and from His teaching of them that followed Him,and 1459 by the Cross being near. For, “I know,” He saith, “whence I come.” This would not greatlyaffect them, but the adding, “and whither I go,” would rather terrify them, since He was not toremain in death. But why said He not, “I know that I am God,” instead of, “I know whence I come”?He ever mingleth lowly words with sublime, and even these He veileth. For after saying, “I bearwitness of Myself,” and proving this, He descendeth to a humbler strain. As though He had said,“I know from whom I am sent, and to whom I depart.” For so they could have had nothing to sayagainst it, when they heard that He was sent from Him, and would depart to Him. “I could not havespoken,” He saith, “any falsehood, I who am come from thence, and depart thither, to the true God.But ye know not God, and therefore judge according to the flesh. For if having heard so many suresigns and proofs ye still say, ‘thy witness is not true,’ if ye deem Moses worthy of credit, both asto what he speaketh concerning others and what he speaketh concerning himself, but Christ not so,this is to judge according to the flesh.” “But I judge no man.” He saith indeed also that “the Fatherjudgeth no man.” ( c. v. 22 .) How then doth He here declare, that, “If I judge, My judgment isjust, for I am not alone”? He again speaketh in reply to their thoughts. “The judgment which isMine is the judgment of the Father. The Father, judging, would not judge otherwise than as I do,and I should not judge otherwise than as the Father.” Wherefore did He mention the Father? Becausethey would not have thought that the Son was to be believed unless He received the witness of the1459Ben. omits “ and. ”285
- Page 240 and 241: NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomLearn we
- Page 242 and 243: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostoma cause t
- Page 244 and 245: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom155The Je
- Page 246 and 247: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom156them.
- Page 248 and 249: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomof presen
- Page 250 and 251: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom159He dot
- Page 252 and 253: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom160delive
- Page 254 and 255: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomthese thi
- Page 256 and 257: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom163father
- Page 258 and 259: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom164words.
- Page 260 and 261: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomclearly p
- Page 262 and 263: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom1671324fo
- Page 264 and 265: NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomHe said
- Page 266 and 267: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom170recall
- Page 268 and 269: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomhusbands,
- Page 270 and 271: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomalso is s
- Page 272 and 273: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomfire. “
- Page 274 and 275: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom175By the
- Page 276 and 277: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomman is no
- Page 278 and 279: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomconfidenc
- Page 280 and 281: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom179this,
- Page 282 and 283: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomdesired b
- Page 284 and 285: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom182kind,
- Page 286 and 287: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom183But wh
- Page 288 and 289: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom1446which
- Page 292 and 293: NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomFather. B
- Page 294 and 295: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom189ask,
- Page 296 and 297: NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomFor He to
- Page 298 and 299: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom192and jo
- Page 300 and 301: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom193Gently
- Page 302 and 303: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom“We hav
- Page 304 and 305: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom196“Tho
- Page 306 and 307: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom197Here t
- Page 308 and 309: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom“And as
- Page 310 and 311: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom200But wh
- Page 312 and 313: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomcandle, s
- Page 314 and 315: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom203But ob
- Page 316 and 317: NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomThese, on
- Page 318 and 319: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom206the mo
- Page 320 and 321: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom207For to
- Page 322 and 323: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom208wisdom
- Page 324 and 325: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom210space
- Page 326 and 327: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom211He sai
- Page 328 and 329: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostomthat they
- Page 330 and 331: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom214“Ble
- Page 332 and 333: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom215accoun
- Page 334 and 335: NPNF (V1-14)St. ChrysostomBut let u
- Page 336 and 337: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom218things
- Page 338 and 339: NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom219adulte
NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m187What He saith, is <strong>of</strong> this kind; “Ye judge unjustly.” “And if,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e, “we judge unjustly,why dost Thou not rebuke us? why dost Thou not punish us? why dost Thou not c<strong>on</strong>demn us?”“Because,” He saith, “I came not for this.” This is <strong>the</strong> meaning <strong>of</strong>, “I judge no man; yet if I judge,My judgment is true.” “For had I been willing <strong>to</strong> judge, ye would have been am<strong>on</strong>g <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>demned.And this I say, not judging you. Yet nei<strong>the</strong>r do I tell you that I say it, not judging you, as though Iwere not c<strong>on</strong>fident that had I judged you, I should have c<strong>on</strong>victed you; since if I had judged you,I must justly have c<strong>on</strong>demned you. But now <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> judgment is not yet.” He alluded also <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>to</strong> come, saying,“I am not al<strong>on</strong>e, but I <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r that sent Me.”Here He hinted, that not He al<strong>on</strong>e c<strong>on</strong>demneth <strong>the</strong>m, but <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r also. Then He c<strong>on</strong>cealedthis, by leading <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> His own testim<strong>on</strong>y.Ver. 17 . “It is written in your Law, that <strong>the</strong> testim<strong>on</strong>y <strong>of</strong> two men is true.”[3.] What would <strong>the</strong> heretics say here? (They would say,) “How is he better than man, if wetake what he hath said simply? For this rule is laid down in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> men, because no man byhimself is trustworthy. But in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> God, how can <strong>on</strong>e endure such a mode <strong>of</strong> speaking? How<strong>the</strong>n is <strong>the</strong> word ‘two’ used? Is it because <strong>the</strong>y are two, or because being men <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>the</strong>reforetwo? If it is because <strong>the</strong>y are two, why did he not betake himself <strong>to</strong> <strong>John</strong>, <strong>and</strong> say, I bear witness<strong>of</strong> myself, <strong>and</strong> <strong>John</strong> beareth witness <strong>of</strong> me? Wherefore not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> angels? Wherefore not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>prophets? For he might have found ten thous<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r testim<strong>on</strong>ies.” But he desireth <strong>to</strong> show notthis <strong>on</strong>ly that <strong>the</strong>re are Two, but also that <strong>the</strong>y are <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> same Substance.Ver. 19 . “Then said <strong>the</strong>y un<strong>to</strong> Him, Who is thy fa<strong>the</strong>r? Jesus answered, Ye nei<strong>the</strong>r know Me,nor My Fa<strong>the</strong>r.”Because while <strong>the</strong>y knew <strong>the</strong>y spake as though <strong>the</strong>y knew not, <strong>and</strong> as if trying Him, He dothnot even deem <strong>the</strong>m worthy <strong>of</strong> an answer. Wherefore henceforth He speaketh all more clearly <strong>and</strong>more boldly; drawing His testim<strong>on</strong>y from signs, <strong>and</strong> from His teaching <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m that followed Him,<strong>and</strong> 1459 by <strong>the</strong> Cross being near. For, “I know,” He saith, “whence I come.” This would not greatlyaffect <strong>the</strong>m, but <strong>the</strong> adding, “<strong>and</strong> whi<strong>the</strong>r I go,” would ra<strong>the</strong>r terrify <strong>the</strong>m, since He was not <strong>to</strong>remain in death. But why said He not, “I know that I am God,” instead <strong>of</strong>, “I know whence I come”?He ever mingleth lowly words with sublime, <strong>and</strong> even <strong>the</strong>se He veileth. For after saying, “I bearwitness <strong>of</strong> Myself,” <strong>and</strong> proving this, He descendeth <strong>to</strong> a humbler strain. As though He had said,“I know from whom I am sent, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> whom I depart.” For so <strong>the</strong>y could have had nothing <strong>to</strong> sayagainst it, when <strong>the</strong>y heard that He was sent from Him, <strong>and</strong> would depart <strong>to</strong> Him. “I could not havespoken,” He saith, “any falsehood, I who am come from <strong>the</strong>nce, <strong>and</strong> depart thi<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> true God.But ye know not God, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore judge according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh. For if having heard so many suresigns <strong>and</strong> pro<strong>of</strong>s ye still say, ‘thy witness is not true,’ if ye deem Moses worthy <strong>of</strong> credit, both as<strong>to</strong> what he speaketh c<strong>on</strong>cerning o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> what he speaketh c<strong>on</strong>cerning himself, but Christ not so,this is <strong>to</strong> judge according <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> flesh.” “But I judge no man.” He saith indeed also that “<strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>rjudgeth no man.” ( c. v. 22 .) How <strong>the</strong>n doth He here declare, that, “If I judge, My judgment isjust, for I am not al<strong>on</strong>e”? He again speaketh in reply <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir thoughts. “The judgment which isMine is <strong>the</strong> judgment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r. The Fa<strong>the</strong>r, judging, would not judge o<strong>the</strong>rwise than as I do,<strong>and</strong> I should not judge o<strong>the</strong>rwise than as <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r.” Wherefore did He menti<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r? Because<strong>the</strong>y would not have thought that <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> was <strong>to</strong> be believed unless He received <strong>the</strong> witness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>1459Ben. omits “ <strong>and</strong>. ”285