12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m163fa<strong>the</strong>r, still He revealed not <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong> truth, lest in removing <strong>on</strong>e cause <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fense He shouldcreate ano<strong>the</strong>r. What <strong>the</strong>n said He when <strong>the</strong>y murmured?Ver. 44 . “No man can come un<strong>to</strong> Me, except <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r which hath sent Me draw Him.”The Manichæans spring up<strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong>se words, saying, “that nothing lies in our own power”; yet<strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong> showeth that we are masters <strong>of</strong> our will. “For if a man cometh <strong>to</strong> Him,” saith some<strong>on</strong>e, “what need is <strong>the</strong>re <strong>of</strong> drawing?” But <strong>the</strong> words do not take away our free will, but show thatwe greatly need assistance. And He implieth not an unwilling 1287 comer, but <strong>on</strong>e enjoying muchsuccor. Then He showeth also <strong>the</strong> manner in which He draweth; for that men may not, again, formany material idea <strong>of</strong> God, He addeth,Ver. 46 . “Not that any man hath seen God, 1288 save He which is <strong>of</strong> God, He hath seen <strong>the</strong>Fa<strong>the</strong>r.”“How <strong>the</strong>n,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e, “doth <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r draw?” This <strong>the</strong> Prophet explained <strong>of</strong> old, whenhe proclaimed beforeh<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> said,Ver. 45 . “They shall all be taught <strong>of</strong> God.” ( Isa. liv. 13 .)Seest thou <strong>the</strong> dignity <strong>of</strong> faith, <strong>and</strong> that not <strong>of</strong> men nor by man, but by God Himself <strong>the</strong>y shall1289learn this? And <strong>to</strong> make this asserti<strong>on</strong> credible, He referred <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir prophets. “If <strong>the</strong>n ‘allshall be taught <strong>of</strong> God,’ how is it that some shall not believe?” Because <strong>the</strong> words are spoken <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> greater number. Besides, <strong>the</strong> prophecy meaneth not absolutely all, but all that have <strong>the</strong> will.For <strong>the</strong> teacher sitteth ready <strong>to</strong> impart what he hath <strong>to</strong> all, <strong>and</strong> pouring forth his instructi<strong>on</strong> un<strong>to</strong>all.Ver. 44 . “And I will raise him up in <strong>the</strong> last day.”Not slight here is <strong>the</strong> authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>, if so be that <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r leadeth, He raiseth up. Hedistinguisheth not His working from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, (how could that be?) but showeth equality1290<strong>of</strong> power. As, <strong>the</strong>refore, after saying in that o<strong>the</strong>r place, “The Fa<strong>the</strong>r which hath sent Me bearethwitness <strong>of</strong> Me,” He <strong>the</strong>n, that <strong>the</strong>y might not be over-curious about <strong>the</strong> utterance, referred <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong><strong>the</strong> Scriptures; so here, that <strong>the</strong>y may not entertain similar suspici<strong>on</strong>s, He referreth <strong>the</strong>m <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>Prophets, whom He c<strong>on</strong>tinually <strong>and</strong> everywhere quoteth, <strong>to</strong> show that He is not opposed <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>Fa<strong>the</strong>r.“But what <strong>of</strong> those,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e, “who were before His time? Were not <strong>the</strong>y taught <strong>of</strong>God? why <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> special applicati<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> words here?” Because <strong>of</strong> old <strong>the</strong>y learned <strong>the</strong> things<strong>of</strong> God by <strong>the</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> men, but now by <strong>the</strong> Only-begotten S<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> God, <strong>and</strong> by <strong>the</strong> Holy Ghost.Then He addeth, “Not that any man hath seen <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, save He which is <strong>of</strong> God,” 1291 using thisexpressi<strong>on</strong> here not with reference <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> cause, but <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> manner <strong>of</strong> being. 1292 Since had He spokenin <strong>the</strong> former sense, we are all “<strong>of</strong> God.” And where <strong>the</strong>n would be <strong>the</strong> special <strong>and</strong> distinct nature<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong>? “But wherefore,” saith some <strong>on</strong>e, “did He not put this more clearly?” Because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir1287Sav. ἄ κοντα , Ben. τυχόντα1288“ The Fa<strong>the</strong>r, ” N.T.1289Ben. “ he fore<strong>to</strong>ld <strong>the</strong>y shall. ”1290ἰ σοστάσιον , al. ἰ σότιμον1291ἐ κ Θεοῦ [ παρὰ Θ v. 46 ].1292i.e. with reference, not <strong>to</strong> men who are “ <strong>of</strong> God ” as being <strong>the</strong>ir Cause by creati<strong>on</strong>, but <strong>to</strong> Himself who is “ <strong>of</strong> God ” byHis Essence .250

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!