12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m143<strong>the</strong>y who underst<strong>and</strong> not <strong>the</strong> method 1087 <strong>of</strong> Holy Scripture, nor search out its peculiarities 1088 <strong>and</strong>laws, but go over all its points carelessly <strong>and</strong> in <strong>on</strong>e manner, will mix <strong>the</strong> gold with earth, <strong>and</strong> neverdiscover <strong>the</strong> treasure which is laid up in it. I say this now because <strong>the</strong> passage before us c<strong>on</strong>tainethmuch gold, not indeed manifest <strong>to</strong> view, but covered over with much obscurity, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore bydigging <strong>and</strong> purifying we must arrive at <strong>the</strong> legitimate sense. For who would not at <strong>on</strong>ce be troubledat hearing Christ say, “If I testify <strong>of</strong> Myself, My witness is not true”; inasmuch as He <strong>of</strong>ten appeareth<strong>to</strong> have testified <strong>of</strong> Himself? For instance, c<strong>on</strong>versing with <strong>the</strong> Samaritan woman He said, “I Amthat speak un<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>e”: <strong>and</strong> in like manner <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> blind man, “It is He that talketh with <strong>the</strong>e” ( c. ix.37 ); <strong>and</strong> rebuking <strong>the</strong> Jews, “Ye say, 1089 thou blasphemest, because I said I am <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> God.”( c. x. 36 .) And in many o<strong>the</strong>r places besides He doth this. If now all <strong>the</strong>se asserti<strong>on</strong>s be false,what hope <strong>of</strong> salvati<strong>on</strong> shall we have? And where shall we find truth when Truth Itself declareth,“My witness is not true”? Nor doth this appear <strong>to</strong> be <strong>the</strong> <strong>on</strong>ly c<strong>on</strong>tradicti<strong>on</strong>; <strong>the</strong>re is ano<strong>the</strong>r notless than this. He saith far<strong>the</strong>r <strong>on</strong>, “Though I bear witness <strong>of</strong> Myself, yet My witness is true” ( c.viii. 14 ); which <strong>the</strong>n, tell me, am I <strong>to</strong> receive, <strong>and</strong> which deem a falsehood? If we take <strong>the</strong>m outthus [from <strong>the</strong> c<strong>on</strong>text] simply as <strong>the</strong>y are said, without carefully c<strong>on</strong>sidering <strong>the</strong> pers<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> whomnor <strong>the</strong> cause for which <strong>the</strong>y are said, nor any o<strong>the</strong>r like circumstances, <strong>the</strong>y will both be falsehoods.For if His witness be “not true,” <strong>the</strong>n this asserti<strong>on</strong> is not true ei<strong>the</strong>r, not merely <strong>the</strong> sec<strong>on</strong>d, but <strong>the</strong>first also. What <strong>the</strong>n is <strong>the</strong> meaning? We need great watchfulness, or ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> grace <strong>of</strong> God, thatwe rest not in <strong>the</strong> mere words; for thus <strong>the</strong> heretics err, because <strong>the</strong>y enquire not in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> object <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> speaker nor <strong>the</strong> dispositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> hearers. If we add not <strong>the</strong>se <strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r points besides, as times<strong>and</strong> places <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> opini<strong>on</strong>s <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> listeners, many absurd c<strong>on</strong>sequences will follow.What <strong>the</strong>n is <strong>the</strong> meaning? 1090 The Jews were about <strong>to</strong> object <strong>to</strong> Him, “If thou bearest witness1091c<strong>on</strong>cerning thyself, thy witness is not true” ( c. viii. 13 ): <strong>the</strong>refore He spake <strong>the</strong>se words inanticipati<strong>on</strong>; as though He had said, “Ye will surely say <strong>to</strong> Me, we believe <strong>the</strong>e not; for no <strong>on</strong>e thatwitnesseth <strong>of</strong> himself is readily 1092 held trustworthy am<strong>on</strong>g men.” So that <strong>the</strong> “is not true” mustnot be read absolutely, but with reference <strong>to</strong> 1093 <strong>the</strong>ir suspici<strong>on</strong>s, as though He had said, “<strong>to</strong> you itis not true”; <strong>and</strong> so He uttered <strong>the</strong> words not looking <strong>to</strong> His own dignity, but <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir secret thoughts.When He saith, “My witness is not true,” He rebuketh <strong>the</strong>ir opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Him, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> objecti<strong>on</strong> about<strong>to</strong> be urged by <strong>the</strong>m against Him; but when He saith, “Though I bear witness <strong>of</strong> Myself, My witnessis true” ( c. viii. 14 ), He declareth <strong>the</strong> very nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thing itself, namely, that as God <strong>the</strong>yought <strong>to</strong> deem Him trustworthy even when speaking <strong>of</strong> Himself. For since He had spoken <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>resurrecti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> dead, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> judgment, <strong>and</strong> that he that believeth <strong>on</strong> Him is not judged, butcometh un<strong>to</strong> life, <strong>and</strong> that He shall sit <strong>to</strong> require account <strong>of</strong> all men, <strong>and</strong> that He hath <strong>the</strong> sameAuthority <strong>and</strong> Power with <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r; <strong>and</strong> since He was about again o<strong>the</strong>rwise <strong>to</strong> prove <strong>the</strong>se things,He necessarily put <strong>the</strong>ir objecti<strong>on</strong> first. “I <strong>to</strong>ld you,” He saith, “that ‘as <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r raiseth <strong>the</strong> dead<strong>and</strong> quickeneth <strong>the</strong>m, so <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> quickeneth whom He will’; I <strong>to</strong>ld you that ‘<strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r judgeth no1087lit. “ c<strong>on</strong>sequence. ”1088ἰ διώματα1089Savile reads, “ <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Jews, How say ye, ” &c.1090al. “ let us see <strong>the</strong>n with what intent <strong>the</strong>se words were said. ”1091σὺ μαρτυρεῖς , G. T.1092al. “ ever. ”1093al. with <strong>the</strong> additi<strong>on</strong> “ <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir, ” &c.218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!