12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>mnature <strong>of</strong> men was better adapted for <strong>the</strong> reas<strong>on</strong>ing <strong>of</strong> philosophy; still he did, as <strong>the</strong>y say, c<strong>on</strong>versewith eagles <strong>and</strong> oxen, using sorceries. For he did not make <strong>the</strong>ir irrati<strong>on</strong>al nature rati<strong>on</strong>al, (this wasimpossible <strong>to</strong> man,) but by his magic tricks he deceived <strong>the</strong> foolish. And neglecting <strong>to</strong> teach menanything useful, he taught that <strong>the</strong>y might as well eat <strong>the</strong> heads <strong>of</strong> those who begot <strong>the</strong>m, as beans.And he persuaded those who associated with him, that <strong>the</strong> soul <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir teacher had actually beenat <strong>on</strong>e time a bush, at ano<strong>the</strong>r a girl, at ano<strong>the</strong>r a fish.Are not <strong>the</strong>se things with good cause extinct, <strong>and</strong> vanished utterly? With good cause, <strong>and</strong>reas<strong>on</strong>ably. But not so <strong>the</strong> words <strong>of</strong> him who was ignorant <strong>and</strong> unlettered; for Syrians, <strong>and</strong> Egyptians,<strong>and</strong> Indians, <strong>and</strong> Persians, <strong>and</strong> Ethiopians, <strong>and</strong> ten thous<strong>and</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r nati<strong>on</strong>s, translating in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>irown t<strong>on</strong>gues <strong>the</strong> doctrines introduced by him, barbarians though <strong>the</strong>y be, have learned <strong>to</strong>philosophize. I did not <strong>the</strong>refore idly say that all <strong>the</strong> world has become his <strong>the</strong>ater. For he did notleave those <strong>of</strong> his own kind, <strong>and</strong> waste his labor <strong>on</strong> <strong>the</strong> irrati<strong>on</strong>al creatures, (an act <strong>of</strong> excessivevainglory <strong>and</strong> extreme folly,) but being clear <strong>of</strong> this as well as <strong>of</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r passi<strong>on</strong>s, he was earnest <strong>on</strong><strong>on</strong>e point <strong>on</strong>ly, that all <strong>the</strong> world might learn somewhat <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> things which might pr<strong>of</strong>it it, <strong>and</strong> beable <strong>to</strong> translate it from earth <strong>to</strong> heaven.For this reas<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong>o, he did not hide his teaching in mist <strong>and</strong> darkness, as <strong>the</strong>y did who threwobscurity <strong>of</strong> speech, like a kind <strong>of</strong> veil, around <strong>the</strong> mischiefs laid up within. But this man’s doctrinesare clearer than <strong>the</strong> sunbeams, wherefore <strong>the</strong>y have been unfolded 29 <strong>to</strong> all men throughout <strong>the</strong>world. For he did not teach as Pythagoras did, comm<strong>and</strong>ing those who came <strong>to</strong> him <strong>to</strong> be silent forfive years, or <strong>to</strong> sit like senseless st<strong>on</strong>es; nei<strong>the</strong>r did he invent fables defining <strong>the</strong> universe <strong>to</strong> c<strong>on</strong>sist<strong>of</strong> numbers; but casting away all this devilish trash <strong>and</strong> mischief, he diffused such simplicity throughhis words, that all he said was plain, not <strong>on</strong>ly <strong>to</strong> wise men, but also <strong>to</strong> women <strong>and</strong> youths. For hewas persuaded that <strong>the</strong> words were true <strong>and</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>itable <strong>to</strong> all that should hearken <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>m. And alltime after him is his witness; since he has drawn <strong>to</strong> him all <strong>the</strong> world, <strong>and</strong> has freed our life whenwe have listened <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>se words from all m<strong>on</strong>strous display <strong>of</strong> wisdom; wherefore we who hear<strong>the</strong>m would prefer ra<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> give up our lives, than <strong>the</strong> doctrines by him delivered <strong>to</strong> us.[6.] From this <strong>the</strong>n, <strong>and</strong> from every o<strong>the</strong>r circumstance, it is plain, that nothing <strong>of</strong> this man’sis human, but divine <strong>and</strong> heavenly are <strong>the</strong> less<strong>on</strong>s which come <strong>to</strong> us by this divine soul. For weshall observe not sounding sentences, nor magnificent dicti<strong>on</strong>, nor excessive <strong>and</strong> useless order <strong>and</strong>arrangement <strong>of</strong> words <strong>and</strong> sentences, (<strong>the</strong>se things are far from all true wisdom,) but strengthinvincible <strong>and</strong> divine, <strong>and</strong> irresistible force <strong>of</strong> right doctrines, <strong>and</strong> a rich supply <strong>of</strong> unnumberedgood things. For <strong>the</strong>ir over-care about expressi<strong>on</strong> was so excessive, so worthy <strong>of</strong> mere sophists, orra<strong>the</strong>r not even <strong>of</strong> sophists, but <strong>of</strong> silly striplings, that even <strong>the</strong>ir own chief philosopher introduceshis own master as greatly ashamed <strong>of</strong> this art, <strong>and</strong> as saying <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> judges, that what <strong>the</strong>y hear fromhim shall be spoken plainly <strong>and</strong> without premeditati<strong>on</strong>, not tricked out rhe<strong>to</strong>rically nor ornamentedwith (fine) sentences <strong>and</strong> words; since, says he, it cannot surely be becoming, O men, that <strong>on</strong>e atmy age should come before you like a lad inventing speeches. 30 And observe <strong>the</strong> extreme absurdity<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> thing; what he has described his master avoiding as disgraceful, unworthy <strong>of</strong> philosophy <strong>and</strong>work for lads, this above all he himself has cultivated. So entirely were <strong>the</strong>y given up <strong>to</strong> mere love<strong>of</strong> distincti<strong>on</strong>.29ἀ νήπλωται .30 Plat. Apol. Socr. § 1, in init.16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!