Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

thefishersofmenministries.com
from thefishersofmenministries.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom133rest also follows by the same consequence; for as to call God His Father, to break the Sabbath,and to be persecuted by the Jews for the former and more especially for the latter reason, belongednot to a false imagination, but to actual fact, so to make Himself equal to God was a declaration ofthe same meaning. 1017And this one may see more clearly from what He had before said, for “My Father worketh, andI work,” is the expression of One declaring Himself equal to God. For in these words He has marked1018no difference. He said not, “He worketh, and I minister,” but, “As He worketh, so work I”; andhath declared absolute Equality. But if He had not wished to establish this, and the Jews had supposedso without reason, He would not have allowed their minds to be deceived, but would have correctedthis. Besides, the Evangelist would not have been silent on the subject, but would have plainly saidthat the Jews supposed so, but that Jesus did not make Himself equal to God. As in another placehe doth this very thing, when he perceiveth that something was said in one way, and understoodin another; as, “Destroy this Temple,” said Christ, “and in three days I will raise It up” ( c. ii. 19); speaking of His Flesh. But the Jews, not understanding this, and supposing that the words werespoken of the Jewish Temple, said, “Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt Thourear it up in three days?” Since then He said one thing, and they imagined another, (for He spakeof His Flesh, and they thought that the words were spoken of their Temple,) the Evangelist remarkingon this, or rather correcting their imagination, goes on to say, “But He spake of the Temple of HisBody.” So that here also, if Christ had not made Himself equal with God, had not wished to establishthis, and yet the Jews had imagined that He did, the writer would here also have corrected theirsupposition, and would have said, “The Jews thought that He made Himself equal to God, butindeed He spake not of equality.” And this is done not in this place only, nor by this Evangelistonly, but again elsewhere another Evangelist is seen to do the same. For when Christ warned Hisdisciples, saying, “Beware of the leaven of the Pharisees and Sadducees” ( Matt. xvi. 6 ), and theyreasoned among themselves, saying, “It is because we have taken no bread,” and He spake of onething, calling their doctrine “leaven,” but the disciples imagined another, supposing that the wordswere said of bread; it is not now the Evangelist who setteth them right, but Christ Himself, speakingthus, “How is it that ye do not understand, that I spake not to you concerning bread?” But herethere is nothing of the kind.“But,” saith some one, “to remove this very thought Christ has added,Ver. 19 . “‘The Son can do nothing of Himself.’”Man! He doth the contrary. He saith this not to take away, but to confirm, 1019 His Equality. Butattend carefully, for this is no common question. The expressionof Himself” is found in manyplaces of Scripture, with reference both to Christ and to the Holy Ghost, and we must learn theforce of the expression, that we may not fall into the greatest errors; for if one take it separately byitself in the way in which it is obvious to take it, consider how great an absurdity will follow. Hesaid not that He could do some things of Himself and that others He could not, but universally,[4.] “The Son can do nothing of Himself.” I ask then my opponent, “Can the Son do nothingof Himself, tell me?” If he reply, “that He can do nothing,” we will say, that He hath done of Himself1017τῆς αὐτῆς γνώμης ἀπόφασίς , i.e. in saying that He was making Himself “ equal to the Father, ” the Evangelist assertsa truth which had before been signified by His breaking the Sabbath, and saying that God was His Father.1018al. “ given. ”1019lit. “ to clench. ”204

NPNF (V1-14)St. Chrysostom134the very greatest of all goods. As Paul cries aloud, saying, “Who being in the form of God, thoughtit not robbery to be equal with God, but made Himself of no reputation, and took upon Him theform of a servant.” ( Phil. ii. 6, 7 .) And again, Christ Himself in another place saith, “I havepower to lay down My life, and I have power to take it again”: and, “No man taketh it from Me,but I lay it down of Myself.” ( c. x. 18 .) Seest thou that He hath power over life and death, andthat He wrought of Himself so mighty a Dispensation? And why speak I concerning Christ, wheneven we, than whom nothing can be meaner, do many things of ourselves? Of ourselves we choosevice, of ourselves we go after virtue, and if we do it not of ourselves, and not having power, weshall neither suffer hell if we do wrong, nor enjoy the Kingdom if we do right.What then meaneth, “Can do nothing of Himself”? That He can do nothing in opposition to theFather, nothing alien from, nothing strange to Him, 1020 which is especially the assertion of Onedeclaring an Equality and entire agreement.But wherefore said He not, that “He doeth nothing contrary,” instead of, “He cannot do”? Itwas that from this again He might show the invariableness and exactness of the Equality, for theexpression imputes not weakness to Him, but even shows 1021 His great power; since in anotherplace Paul saith of the Father, “That by two immutable things in which it was impos sible for Godto lie” ( Heb. vi. 18 ): and again, “If we deny Him — He abideth faithful,” for “He cannot denyHimself.” ( 2 Tim. ii. 12, 13 .) And in truth this expression, “impossible,” is not declaratory ofweakness, but power, power unspeakable. For what He saith is of this kind, that “that Essenceadmitteth not such things as these.” For just as when we also say, “it is impossible for God to dowrong,” we do not impute to Him any weakness, but confess in Him an unutterable power; so whenHe also saith, “I can of Mine own Self do nothing” ( v. 30 ), His meaning is, that “it is impossible,nature admits not, 1022 that I should do anything contrary to the Father.” And that you may learnthat this is really what is said, let us, going over what follows, see whether Christ agreeth with whatis said by us, or among you. Thou sayest, that the expression does away with His Power and Hisproper Authority, and shows His might to be but weak; but I say, that this proves His Equality, Hisunvarying Likeness, 1023 (to the Father,) and the fact that all is done as it were by one Will 1024 andPower and Might. Let us then enquire of Christ Himself, and see by what He next saith whetherHe interpreteth these words according to thy supposition or according to ours. What then saith He?“For what things soever the Father 1025 doeth these also doeth the Son likewise.”Seest thou how He hath taken away your assertion by the root, and confirmed what is said byus? since, if Christ doeth nothing of Himself, neither will the Father do anything of Himself, if sobe that Christ doeth all things in like manner to Him. 1026 If this be not the case, another strangeconclusion will follow. For He said not, that “whatsoever things He saw the Father do, He did,”but, “except He see the Father doing anything, He doeth it not”; extending His words to all time;now He will, according to you, be continually learning the same things. Seest thou how exalted isthe idea, and that the very humility of the expression compelleth even the most shameless and̓1020i.e. nothing by Himself.1021al. “ testifies. ”1022ἀ νεγχώρητον1023τὸ ἀπαράλλακτον1024γνώμης1025Εκεῖνος , G. T.1026Morel. and ms. in Bodl., “ that the ‘ likewise ’ ( τὸ ὁμοίως ) may remain. ”205

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m134<strong>the</strong> very greatest <strong>of</strong> all goods. As Paul cries aloud, saying, “Who being in <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> God, thoughtit not robbery <strong>to</strong> be equal with God, but made Himself <strong>of</strong> no reputati<strong>on</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>to</strong>ok up<strong>on</strong> Him <strong>the</strong>form <strong>of</strong> a servant.” ( Phil. ii. 6, 7 .) And again, Christ Himself in ano<strong>the</strong>r place saith, “I havepower <strong>to</strong> lay down My life, <strong>and</strong> I have power <strong>to</strong> take it again”: <strong>and</strong>, “No man taketh it from Me,but I lay it down <strong>of</strong> Myself.” ( c. x. 18 .) Seest thou that He hath power over life <strong>and</strong> death, <strong>and</strong>that He wrought <strong>of</strong> Himself so mighty a Dispensati<strong>on</strong>? And why speak I c<strong>on</strong>cerning Christ, wheneven we, than whom nothing can be meaner, do many things <strong>of</strong> ourselves? Of ourselves we choosevice, <strong>of</strong> ourselves we go after virtue, <strong>and</strong> if we do it not <strong>of</strong> ourselves, <strong>and</strong> not having power, weshall nei<strong>the</strong>r suffer hell if we do wr<strong>on</strong>g, nor enjoy <strong>the</strong> Kingdom if we do right.What <strong>the</strong>n meaneth, “Can do nothing <strong>of</strong> Himself”? That He can do nothing in oppositi<strong>on</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong>Fa<strong>the</strong>r, nothing alien from, nothing strange <strong>to</strong> Him, 1020 which is especially <strong>the</strong> asserti<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> Onedeclaring an Equality <strong>and</strong> entire agreement.But wherefore said He not, that “He doeth nothing c<strong>on</strong>trary,” instead <strong>of</strong>, “He cannot do”? Itwas that from this again He might show <strong>the</strong> invariableness <strong>and</strong> exactness <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Equality, for <strong>the</strong>expressi<strong>on</strong> imputes not weakness <strong>to</strong> Him, but even shows 1021 His great power; since in ano<strong>the</strong>rplace Paul saith <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r, “That by two immutable things in which it was impos sible for God<strong>to</strong> lie” ( Heb. vi. 18 ): <strong>and</strong> again, “If we deny Him — He abideth faithful,” for “He cannot denyHimself.” ( 2 Tim. ii. 12, 13 .) And in truth this expressi<strong>on</strong>, “impossible,” is not declara<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>of</strong>weakness, but power, power unspeakable. For what He saith is <strong>of</strong> this kind, that “that Essenceadmitteth not such things as <strong>the</strong>se.” For just as when we also say, “it is impossible for God <strong>to</strong> dowr<strong>on</strong>g,” we do not impute <strong>to</strong> Him any weakness, but c<strong>on</strong>fess in Him an unutterable power; so whenHe also saith, “I can <strong>of</strong> Mine own Self do nothing” ( v. 30 ), His meaning is, that “it is impossible,nature admits not, 1022 that I should do anything c<strong>on</strong>trary <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r.” And that you may learnthat this is really what is said, let us, going over what follows, see whe<strong>the</strong>r Christ agreeth with whatis said by us, or am<strong>on</strong>g you. Thou sayest, that <strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong> does away with His Power <strong>and</strong> Hisproper Authority, <strong>and</strong> shows His might <strong>to</strong> be but weak; but I say, that this proves His Equality, Hisunvarying Likeness, 1023 (<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r,) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> fact that all is d<strong>on</strong>e as it were by <strong>on</strong>e Will 1024 <strong>and</strong>Power <strong>and</strong> Might. Let us <strong>the</strong>n enquire <strong>of</strong> Christ Himself, <strong>and</strong> see by what He next saith whe<strong>the</strong>rHe interpreteth <strong>the</strong>se words according <strong>to</strong> thy suppositi<strong>on</strong> or according <strong>to</strong> ours. What <strong>the</strong>n saith He?“For what things soever <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r 1025 doeth <strong>the</strong>se also doeth <strong>the</strong> S<strong>on</strong> likewise.”Seest thou how He hath taken away your asserti<strong>on</strong> by <strong>the</strong> root, <strong>and</strong> c<strong>on</strong>firmed what is said byus? since, if Christ doeth nothing <strong>of</strong> Himself, nei<strong>the</strong>r will <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r do anything <strong>of</strong> Himself, if sobe that Christ doeth all things in like manner <strong>to</strong> Him. 1026 If this be not <strong>the</strong> case, ano<strong>the</strong>r strangec<strong>on</strong>clusi<strong>on</strong> will follow. For He said not, that “whatsoever things He saw <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r do, He did,”but, “except He see <strong>the</strong> Fa<strong>the</strong>r doing anything, He doeth it not”; extending His words <strong>to</strong> all time;now He will, according <strong>to</strong> you, be c<strong>on</strong>tinually learning <strong>the</strong> same things. Seest thou how exalted is<strong>the</strong> idea, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>the</strong> very humility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> expressi<strong>on</strong> compelleth even <strong>the</strong> most shameless <strong>and</strong>̓1020i.e. nothing by Himself.1021al. “ testifies. ”1022ἀ νεγχώρητον1023τὸ ἀπαράλλακτον1024γνώμης1025Εκεῖνος , G. T.1026Morel. <strong>and</strong> ms. in Bodl., “ that <strong>the</strong> ‘ likewise ’ ( τὸ ὁμοίως ) may remain. ”205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!