12.07.2015 Views

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

Homilies on the Gospel of St. John and the Epistle to the Hebrews

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NPNF (V1-14)<strong>St</strong>. Chrysos<strong>to</strong>m73I said before that He was best known in Galilee; <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>y invite Him <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> marriage, <strong>and</strong>He comes; for He looked not <strong>to</strong> His own h<strong>on</strong>or, but <strong>to</strong> our benefit. He who disdained not <strong>to</strong> “takeup<strong>on</strong> Him <strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> a servant” ( Philip. ii. 7 ), would much less disdain <strong>to</strong> be present at <strong>the</strong>marriage <strong>of</strong> servants; He who sat down “with publicans <strong>and</strong> sinners” ( Matt. ix. 13 ), would muchless refuse <strong>to</strong> sit down with those present at <strong>the</strong> marriage. Assuredly <strong>the</strong>y who invited Him had notformed a proper judgment <strong>of</strong> Him, nor did <strong>the</strong>y invite Him as some great <strong>on</strong>e, but merely as anordinary acquaintance; <strong>and</strong> this <strong>the</strong> Evangelist has hinted at, when he says, “The mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>of</strong> Jesuswas <strong>the</strong>re, <strong>and</strong> His brethren.” Just as <strong>the</strong>y invited her <strong>and</strong> His brethren, <strong>the</strong>y invited Jesus.Ver. 3 . “And when <strong>the</strong>y wanted wine, His mo<strong>the</strong>r saith un<strong>to</strong> Him, They have no wine.”Here it is worth while <strong>to</strong> enquire whence it came in<strong>to</strong> His mo<strong>the</strong>r’s mind <strong>to</strong> imagine anythinggreat <strong>of</strong> her S<strong>on</strong>; for He had as yet d<strong>on</strong>e no miracle, since <strong>the</strong> Evangelist saith, “This beginning <strong>of</strong>miracles did Jesus in Cana <strong>of</strong> Galilee.” ( c. ii. 11 .)[2.] Now if any say that this is not a sufficient pro<strong>of</strong> that it was <strong>the</strong> “beginning <strong>of</strong> His miracles,”because <strong>the</strong>re is added simply “in Cana <strong>of</strong> Galilee,” as allowing it <strong>to</strong> have been <strong>the</strong> first d<strong>on</strong>e <strong>the</strong>re,but not al<strong>to</strong>ge<strong>the</strong>r <strong>and</strong> absolutely <strong>the</strong> first, for He probably might have d<strong>on</strong>e o<strong>the</strong>rs elsewhere, wewill make answer <strong>to</strong> him <strong>of</strong> that which we have said before. And <strong>of</strong> what kind? The words <strong>of</strong> <strong>John</strong>(<strong>the</strong> Baptist); “And I knew Him not; but that He should be made manifest <strong>to</strong> Israel, <strong>the</strong>refore am Icome, baptizing with water.” Now if He had wrought miracles in early age, <strong>the</strong> Israelites wouldnot have needed ano<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> declare Him. For He who came am<strong>on</strong>g men, <strong>and</strong> by His miracles wasso made known, not <strong>to</strong> those <strong>on</strong>ly in Judæa, but also <strong>to</strong> those in Syria <strong>and</strong> bey<strong>on</strong>d, <strong>and</strong> who did thisin three years <strong>on</strong>ly, or ra<strong>the</strong>r who did not need even <strong>the</strong>se three years <strong>to</strong> manifest Himself ( Matt.iv. 24 ), for immediately <strong>and</strong> from <strong>the</strong> first His fame went abroad everywhere; He, I say, who ina short time so sh<strong>on</strong>e forth by <strong>the</strong> multitude <strong>of</strong> His miracles, that His name was well known <strong>to</strong> all,was much less likely, if while a child He had from an early age wrought miracles, <strong>to</strong> escape noticeso l<strong>on</strong>g. For what was d<strong>on</strong>e would have seemed stranger as d<strong>on</strong>e by a boy, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re would havebeen time for twice or thrice as many, <strong>and</strong> much more. But in fact He did nothing while He was achild, save <strong>on</strong>ly that <strong>on</strong>e thing <strong>to</strong> which Luke has testified ( Luke ii. 46 ), that at <strong>the</strong> age <strong>of</strong> twelveyears He sat hearing <strong>the</strong> doc<strong>to</strong>rs, <strong>and</strong> was thought admirable for His questi<strong>on</strong>ing. Besides, it wasin accordance with likelihood <strong>and</strong> reas<strong>on</strong> that He did not begin His signs at <strong>on</strong>ce from an early age;for <strong>the</strong>y would have deemed <strong>the</strong> thing a delusi<strong>on</strong>. For if when He was <strong>of</strong> full age many suspectedthis, much more, if while quite young He had wrought miracles, would <strong>the</strong>y have hurried Himso<strong>on</strong>er <strong>and</strong> before <strong>the</strong> proper time <strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> Cross, in <strong>the</strong> venom <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir malice; <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> very facts <strong>of</strong><strong>the</strong> Dispensati<strong>on</strong> would have been discredited.“How <strong>the</strong>n,” asks some <strong>on</strong>e, “came it in<strong>to</strong> <strong>the</strong> mind <strong>of</strong> His mo<strong>the</strong>r <strong>to</strong> imagine anything great <strong>of</strong>Him?” He was now beginning <strong>to</strong> reveal Himself, <strong>and</strong> was plainly discovered by <strong>the</strong> witness <strong>of</strong><strong>John</strong>, <strong>and</strong> by what He had said <strong>to</strong> His disciples. And before all this, <strong>the</strong> C<strong>on</strong>cepti<strong>on</strong> itself <strong>and</strong> allits attending circumstances 544 had inspired her with a very great opini<strong>on</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Child; “for,” saidLuke, “she heard all <strong>the</strong> sayings c<strong>on</strong>cerning <strong>the</strong> Child, <strong>and</strong> kept <strong>the</strong>m in her heart.” 545 “Why <strong>the</strong>n,”says <strong>on</strong>e, “did not she speak this before?” 546 Because, as I said, it was now at last that He was544 al. “<strong>and</strong> all that <strong>to</strong>ok place after His birth.”545 This is <strong>the</strong> comm<strong>on</strong> reading, but <strong>the</strong> passage ( Luke ii. 51 ) is not so found in G. T.; Morel. <strong>and</strong> ms. in Bodleian read:τοῦτο καὶ ὁ Λουκᾶς ἡμῖν δείκνυσι λέγων· ἡ δὲ Μαριὰμ συνετήρει τὰ ῥήματα πάντα συμβάλλουσα ἐν τῇ κ .546 i.e. as she spoke at <strong>the</strong> marriage.114

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!