Digesters - Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
Digesters - Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago Digesters - Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago
Energy Flow Model - ScenariosScenario Group 1 (No Cogen)– DG Priority = 1. 2.Scenario Group 2 (No Cogen)– DG Priority = 1. 2.Scenario Group 3– DG Priority = 1. Heating 2. 3.Scenario Group 4– DG Priority = 1. 2. 3. = NGScenario Group 5– DG Priority = 1. 2. 3.Scenario Group 6PlantHeatingBoilersMBMFacilityPlantBoilersPlantHeatingBoilersMBMFacilityMBMFacilityPlantHeatingBoilersCogenerationCogenerationCogenerationDG Priority = 1. 2. 3. = NGCogenerationMBMFacilityPlantHeatingBoilersMBMFacilityPlantHeatingBoilersMBMFacility
150,000100,000GHG reduction (MT eCO2) / Unused Energy (10 mmBtu)$1,269,807Energy Flow Model - Results$3,000,00050,0000Annualized Cost ($) GHG reduction (MT eCO2) Unused Energy (mmBtu)‐50,000Group 1+2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5Group 6‐100,000‐150,000$(1,752,000)$(2,253,696)$(2,284,723)$(1,940,343)$(2,022,458)$(491,357)$(443,080)$(776,085)$(453,080)$(790,209)$(342,295)$(722,873)$(114,267)$(1,039,169)$(271,033)$95,142$209,259$697,906$661,099$630,566$374,447$381,606$594,236$1,036,729$1,518,767$1,269,807$826,287$1,518,767$2,000,000$1,000,000$‐Annualized Cost [$]$(1,000,000)$(2,000,000)$(3,000,000)NoCogenDG to1)Plant,2)MBM,3)CogenDG to1)Plant,2)Cogen,3)MBMDG to1)MBM,2)Cogen,3)PlantDG to1)Cogen,2)Plant,3)MBMScenario
- Page 1 and 2: Digester Gas Utilization at SWRPWhe
- Page 3: Presentation Outline• Background/
- Page 9 and 10: Projected Digester PerformanceVSR
- Page 12 and 13: Digester Gas Production - Modeling
- Page 15 and 16: Energy Consumption at SWRP• Build
- Page 24 and 25: Energy Flow Scenarios:Digester Gas?
- Page 26 and 27: Energy Flow Modeling Framework26
- Page 28 and 29: Model Components - Gas Cleanings H2
- Page 30 and 31: Model Components - Plant Energy Dem
- Page 32 and 33: Projecting Future Energy Prices•
- Page 36 and 37: Energy Flow Model - Results$2,000,0
- Page 38 and 39: Engine Operation Alternatives• Ba
- Page 40 and 41: Updated Model Parameters• New Per
- Page 42: Sensitivity Analysis - Electricity
- Page 45 and 46: Triple Bottom Line Analysis• Econ
- Page 47 and 48: Other Reference InstallationsMetrop
- Page 49 and 50: Calls and Field Visits - Steam Turb
- Page 51 and 52: Conclusions/Discussion• A Combine
- Page 53 and 54: Sizing of Cogeneration SystemsCogen
- Page 55 and 56: Triple Bottom Line ScoringScenario
150,000100,000GHG reduction (MT eCO2) / Unused Energy (10 mmBtu)$1,269,807Energy Flow Model - Results$3,000,00050,0000Annualized Cost ($) GHG reduction (MT eCO2) Unused Energy (mmBtu)‐50,000Group 1+2 Group 3 Group 4 Group 5Group 6‐100,000‐150,000$(1,752,000)$(2,253,696)$(2,284,723)$(1,940,343)$(2,022,458)$(491,357)$(443,080)$(776,085)$(453,080)$(790,209)$(342,295)$(722,873)$(114,267)$(1,039,169)$(271,033)$95,142$209,259$697,906$661,099$630,566$374,447$381,606$594,236$1,036,729$1,518,767$1,269,807$826,287$1,518,767$2,000,000$1,000,000$‐Annualized Cost [$]$(1,000,000)$(2,000,000)$(3,000,000)NoCogenDG to1)Plant,2)MBM,3)CogenDG to1)Plant,2)Cogen,3)MBMDG to1)MBM,2)Cogen,3)PlantDG to1)Cogen,2)Plant,3)MBMScenario
Change language