12.07.2015 Views

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The flight through the woods186. The approximately 10,000 to 15,000 refugees, virtually all men, who – <strong>of</strong>ten at thedirection <strong>of</strong> Dutchbat – fled into the woods were for the most part unarmed (see page2480 <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report and point 61 in the Decision <strong>of</strong> the Yugoslavia Tribunal in thecase Krstic at first instance). To the extent that these refugees did have weapons theywere light weapons or improvised weapons. This instruction by Dutchbat to the men t<strong>of</strong>lee into the woods can only be explained by the fear entertained by Dutchbat for thelives <strong>of</strong> the male refugees should they fall into the hands <strong>of</strong> the VRS. This fear waspossibly prompted in part by earlier experiences in that regard, for example, the mur<strong>der</strong><strong>of</strong> 762 men who fell into VRS hands on 1 June 1992 in Zvornik. Moreover, it should betaken into account that this flight through the woods cut straight through territorycontrolled by the Bosnian Serbs, an area, moreover, that was infested with mine fields.All this being taken into account Dutchbat still viewed it as preferable being taken by theVRS.187. A large proportion <strong>of</strong> the refugees did not arrive in Tuzla. The majority were killed bymines, were shot dead by Serbs or were taken prisoner. After capture most <strong>of</strong> the menwere immediately or shortly thereafter mur<strong>der</strong>ed. The Yugoslavia Tribunal establishedin 2001 that not less than 7,475 persons were missing, that about 6,000 men were takenprisoner and that in July 1995 between 7,000 and 8,000 men were mur<strong>der</strong>ed (see points81, 83 and 84 <strong>of</strong> the Decision <strong>of</strong> the Yugoslavia Tribunal in the case Krstic at firstinstance). The decision in the case Krstic further reveals that the core <strong>of</strong> these executionstook place between 14 and 17 July 1995 (see also NIOD Report page 2545). Manyexecutions – on a smaller scale – took place for weeks after 17 July 1995.188. Plaintiff notes in respect <strong>of</strong> the above that, given the real danger that the refugees ranand the fact that Dutchbat was aware <strong>of</strong> that danger, it was the responsibility <strong>of</strong> Dutchbatto sound the alarm over the fate <strong>of</strong> these refugees and to action. If such steps had beentaken on 11 July 1995, or subsequently, then it is virtually certain that many <strong>of</strong> themcould have been saved. What is certain is that Dutchbat raised no alarm and took noaction.© <strong>Van</strong> <strong>Diepen</strong> <strong>Van</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Kroef</strong> Advocaten 2007www.vandiepen.com82

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!