- Page 1 and 2:
WRIT OF SUMMONSDISTRICT COURT, THE
- Page 3 and 4:
IN ORDER:on Wednesday, thetwo thous
- Page 5 and 6:
- every request by the inhabitants
- Page 7 and 8:
8. The fate of the civilian populat
- Page 9 and 10:
IV Tender of evidence 446I Facts5.
- Page 11 and 12:
NIOD. This Report is referred to as
- Page 13 and 14:
12. The Yugoslav People’s Army (o
- Page 15 and 16:
‘Prior to departing, he addressed
- Page 17 and 18:
- UN resolution 816 (31 March 1993)
- Page 19 and 20:
No. 4:Decides to ensure full respec
- Page 21 and 22:
…Should UNPROFOR’s presence pro
- Page 23 and 24:
30. To reiterate here, the question
- Page 25 and 26:
UN and the State of the Netherlands
- Page 27 and 28:
Brigade. In addition, the State of
- Page 29 and 30: 43. The choice in favour of deploym
- Page 31 and 32: The government parties replied to t
- Page 33 and 34: population during the training as
- Page 35 and 36: Potocari/Srebrenica. This chain of
- Page 37 and 38: 63. As appears from the above, and
- Page 39 and 40: eference to the failure to act of D
- Page 41 and 42: ‘I have been directed, today 29 M
- Page 43 and 44: leaders (Milosevic, Karadzic and Ml
- Page 45 and 46: observation post was not carried ou
- Page 47 and 48: attack on the Safe Area on 6 July 1
- Page 49 and 50: single shot being fired and OP-F wa
- Page 51 and 52: immediate and robust reaction Nicol
- Page 53 and 54: know what Dutchbat itself would do
- Page 55 and 56: that the enclave was continuously e
- Page 57 and 58: ‘You are to use all means at your
- Page 59 and 60: Commander therefore gave the order
- Page 61 and 62: he proposed to have Karremens arres
- Page 63 and 64: Brantz, to establish that there was
- Page 65 and 66: officers and the State of the Nethe
- Page 67 and 68: had any purpose to go ahead with th
- Page 69 and 70: Voorhoeve (see also number 307 of t
- Page 71 and 72: y VRS soldiers in Dutch uniform and
- Page 73 and 74: population: medical matters (Dutchb
- Page 75 and 76: OP-N161. The capture of OP-N is des
- Page 77 and 78: Brantz (Tuzla)↕Karremans, Franken
- Page 79: ‘The first line of resistance to
- Page 83 and 84: The flight to the UN compound189. D
- Page 85 and 86: 193. It is incomprehensible that Du
- Page 87 and 88: soldiers let that be known when the
- Page 89 and 90: Other points concerned forced evict
- Page 91 and 92: ‘On 12 and 13 July 1995, upon the
- Page 93 and 94: statements put in the proceedings a
- Page 95 and 96: lying on a wagon. The Dutchbat sold
- Page 97 and 98: 228. Only one Dutchbat officer was
- Page 99 and 100: ‘UNMO source about 1,000 men take
- Page 101 and 102: night-time. I did not dare to leave
- Page 103 and 104: 239. Plaintiff Hotič states (see E
- Page 105 and 106: People had no food or water, nor we
- Page 107 and 108: During all of this the Dutch soldie
- Page 109 and 110: group and they were raped. I was ve
- Page 111 and 112: four or five Dutchbat soldiers were
- Page 113 and 114: shocked by what he had evidently se
- Page 115 and 116: follows:‘An alternative position
- Page 117 and 118: ‘We were deported to Tuzla later
- Page 119 and 120: I arrived at the barrier shortly th
- Page 121 and 122: encountered objections from the Dut
- Page 123 and 124: 277. Plaintiff Hasanović was born
- Page 125 and 126: Subašić282. Plaintiff Subašić w
- Page 127 and 128: IILegal characterisationIntroductio
- Page 129 and 130: the United Nations, Advisory opinio
- Page 131 and 132:
302. The UN and the State of the Ne
- Page 133 and 134:
acting arise, respectively). In add
- Page 135 and 136:
of the Safe Area and was not immedi
- Page 137 and 138:
weapons of the VRS, or at least to
- Page 139 and 140:
consequence that the VRS could depl
- Page 141 and 142:
326. Instead of taking action from
- Page 143 and 144:
‘(…) I had spent days lying on
- Page 145 and 146:
23 July 1995 (see H. Praamsma, J. P
- Page 147 and 148:
(a) (…) encouraging the progressi
- Page 149 and 150:
‘Article 3 - General Principles1.
- Page 151 and 152:
control of UNPROFOR from the moment
- Page 153 and 154:
‘The presumption can be rebutted
- Page 155 and 156:
ecame entwined. In his view, it was
- Page 157 and 158:
Conventions obliges the Contracting
- Page 159 and 160:
Article 8 of the ILC Articles for I
- Page 161 and 162:
- secondly, it was evident that the
- Page 163 and 164:
international customary humanitaria
- Page 165 and 166:
civilians, deportation and murder.
- Page 167 and 168:
‘(…) confirm that Article I doe
- Page 169 and 170:
also be assessed by legal criteria,
- Page 171 and 172:
‘(14) UNPROFOR had participated a
- Page 173 and 174:
under customary law. A duty on stat
- Page 175 and 176:
and the State of the Netherlands ac
- Page 177 and 178:
for International Organisations com
- Page 179 and 180:
‘(c) Provide those who claim to b
- Page 181 and 182:
the State of the Netherlands must p
- Page 183 and 184:
of the Netherlands. The UN and the
- Page 185 and 186:
‘militairement avait mal conduit.
- Page 187 and 188:
UN but also to the purposes that ar
- Page 189 and 190:
possible immunity on the part of th
- Page 191 and 192:
‘The United Nations shall make pr
- Page 193 and 194:
‘In spite of this provision of th
- Page 195:
THEREFORE:If it pleases the Court t