12.07.2015 Views

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

hours in the afternoon, Karremans himself submitted a new request for Close AirSupport. It is rather striking that no trace is to be found <strong>of</strong> either request in Zagreb,Sarajevo or with NATO (see page 252 <strong>of</strong> the Summary <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report). Plaintiffwill further describe below the events surrounding the departure from the blockingpositions.118. Dutchbat soldiers witnessed the actions <strong>of</strong> the VRS halfway along the road from ZeleniJadar to Srebrenica on 10 July 1995 immediately prior to Dutchbat completely taking upposition at the blocking positions. Because <strong>of</strong> the fine weather Dutchbat soldiers couldclearly see how the VRS advanced with tanks and cleansed the villages. The VRSsystematically set alight the houses spread along the road. The pattern was that tankswould first fire a shell through the ro<strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> a house and then hunt the fleeing people toshoot them with machine guns. House after house went up in flames in this way (seepage 2173 <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report). Once again this was not a reason for Dutchbat and theUN to engage in military action. Nor was it a reason for Dutchbat to report thecommission <strong>of</strong> war crimes against the civilian population, which – as will be explainedbelow – it certainly should have done.119. Colonel Brantz <strong>of</strong> the Sector North East in Tuzla spoke about the situation in Srebrenicawith the Chief <strong>of</strong> Staff <strong>of</strong> the Second ABiH Corps, Budaković, on 10 July 1995.According to the minutes <strong>of</strong> the discussion Brantz provided information on the CloseAir Support procedure and, as an example <strong>of</strong> what NATO was capable <strong>of</strong>, stated thatthree aircraft could destroy about 70 targets. Brantz also told the ABiH that DutchbatComman<strong>der</strong> Karremans had given clear or<strong>der</strong>s to block the VRS advance and to fire onthe VRS. That or<strong>der</strong> was likewise not carried out by Dutchbat. Brantz also informedBudaković that the ABiH and the Comman<strong>der</strong> <strong>of</strong> Dutchbat maintained good liaisonbetween their activities (see page 2141 <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report). The picture painted byBrantz was incorrect.120. The Comman<strong>der</strong> <strong>of</strong> blocking position Bravo 4 reported to the Comman<strong>der</strong> <strong>of</strong> BCompany <strong>of</strong> Dutchbat that when the VRS infantry near the transmitter mast came downthe road, Bravo 4 and Bravo 3 would be cut <strong>of</strong>f from Srebrenica. The Company© <strong>Van</strong> <strong>Diepen</strong> <strong>Van</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Kroef</strong> Advocaten 2007www.vandiepen.com58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!