12.07.2015 Views

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

threatened with death, no permission would come from Zagreb for the deployment <strong>of</strong>Close Air Support. The UN here allowed a unique possibility to pass <strong>of</strong> eliminating anextensive number <strong>of</strong> weapons systems <strong>of</strong> the VRS at this early stage (see page 2103 <strong>of</strong>the NIOD Report). The refusal <strong>of</strong> the request for Close Air Support and the reasonsgiven for that refusal are incomprehensible to Plaintiff and evidence an incorrectun<strong>der</strong>standing <strong>of</strong> the tasks and powers <strong>of</strong> UNPROFOR.93. Srebrenica was bombarded by the VRS on 7 July 1995 which resulted in four fatalitiesand 17 wounded among the civilian population in the centre <strong>of</strong> Srebrenica (see number248 <strong>of</strong> the UN Report). Even that appeared to be no cause for military intervention bythe UN and Dutchbat. It subsequently emerged from the statement <strong>of</strong> the Chief <strong>of</strong> Staff<strong>of</strong> the VRS, General Milovanovic, that the bombardments had been studied. He declaredthat the bombardments were intended to intimidate Dutchbat and the civilian population(see page 2107 <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report).94. Fighting in the Safe Area intensified on 8 July 1995. In the night <strong>of</strong> 7 to 8 July 1995observation posts counted 275 incoming artillery and mortar shells. The ABiH againrequested Dutchbat on 8 July for a return <strong>of</strong> the weapons from the Weapon CollectionPoint but that request was once more refused. That refusal was again explained with thestatement that it was the task <strong>of</strong> Dutchbat to protect the enclave and not the task <strong>of</strong> theABiH (see number 477 <strong>of</strong> the UN Report). Dutchbat also stated that NATO wouldintervene with the deployment <strong>of</strong> Close Air Support when that was necessary (see page2114 et seq. <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report).Surren<strong>der</strong> <strong>of</strong> observation post F (OP-F)95. The observation post OP-F came un<strong>der</strong> fire on 8 July 1995 from VRS tanks that fired onABiH positions. Following that UNMOs (UN military observers) observed that the VRSwas making preparations to attack the OP. Two tanks were deployed and their firecaused a breach in the defense wall <strong>of</strong> the OP. Although anti-tank weapons were presentat the OP, they were not deployed (see number 253 <strong>of</strong> the UN Report). Thereupon VRSsoldiers approached OP-F from out <strong>of</strong> the woods. Two VRS soldiers came up to the OPand more came after some signalling. The crew <strong>of</strong> OP-F surren<strong>der</strong>ed without even a© <strong>Van</strong> <strong>Diepen</strong> <strong>Van</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Kroef</strong> Advocaten 2007www.vandiepen.com48

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!