12.07.2015 Views

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(…)(d) Make available all appropriate legal, diplomatic and consular means to ensure thatvictims can exercise their rights to remedy for gross violations <strong>of</strong> international humanrights law or serious violations <strong>of</strong> international humanitarian law.’A Member State should ensure on the ground <strong>of</strong> Article VIII, number 13 <strong>of</strong> the BasicPrinciples that not only individuals but also groups <strong>of</strong> victims can enforce their rights.The Foundation constitutes a group <strong>of</strong> victims within the meaning <strong>of</strong> Article VIIInumber 13 <strong>of</strong> the Basic Principles.431. The family <strong>of</strong> Plaintiff and the persons whose interests are promoted by Foundation arevictims <strong>of</strong> gross breaches <strong>of</strong> human rights, such as the the right to life and tohumanitarian care. Moreover, the mandate <strong>of</strong> the UN implied the protection <strong>of</strong> humanrights. The resolutions adopted by the Security Council gave the or<strong>der</strong> to protect theSafe Area and the civilians who found themselves there. Given that the protection <strong>of</strong>human life was the object <strong>of</strong> the resolution, UN resolutions 836 and 844 also conferrights directly on individuals.432. Both the CAVV Report and the Basic Principles lead to the result that Plaintiff andFoundation can in this case enforce their rights, <strong>der</strong>iving from public international law,before the Dutch Court. As that applies for gross breaches <strong>of</strong> human rights, so it appliesall the more for the breach <strong>of</strong> the obligations arising from the Genocide Convention.Plaintiff and Foundation have a claim against the UN and the State <strong>of</strong> the Netherlandson the ground <strong>of</strong> public international law as the violated norms <strong>of</strong> public internationallaw confer rights directly on the individual (see, CAVV Opinion, nos. 3.5.1 and 3.5.2).433. The Basic Principles provide also that victims have a right to compensation if restoration<strong>of</strong> the situation that existed prior to the damage-causing facts is not possible. Suchcompensation is awarded, inter alia, for physical and mental injury, lost chances,including employment, education and social security benefits. Compensation is alsoawarded for material damage and loss <strong>of</strong> pr<strong>of</strong>it or earnings and for non-material damage(see, Article IX, number 20 <strong>of</strong> the Basic Principles). In the light <strong>of</strong> the above the UN and© <strong>Van</strong> <strong>Diepen</strong> <strong>Van</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Kroef</strong> Advocaten 2007www.vandiepen.com180

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!