12.07.2015 Views

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

23 July 1995 (see H. Praamsma, J. Peekel, T. Boumans, Herinneringen aan Srebrenica,171 Soldatengesprekken, page 214):‘I am totally disillusioned with the army command. A man such as Couzy still has toexplain a few things to me. I spoke to him in Zagreb on 23 July for a quarter <strong>of</strong> anhour. He said then:‘Adjutant (…) note my words: the world press will soon be here andthey will want to hear from you that you have seen all manner <strong>of</strong> things. But you sawnothing, because nothing happened’.’334. It was concluded in the Report <strong>of</strong> the French Parliament that the reason for the nonreporting<strong>of</strong> the observed war crimes lay in the fact that during the entire crisis thepriority <strong>of</strong> the Dutch government lay in the protection <strong>of</strong> the Dutchbat soldiers heldcaptive by the Bosnian Serbs (VRS) (see the Report <strong>of</strong> the French Parliament, Part I,page 102). The State <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands allowed by that balancing <strong>of</strong> interests a possibledanger for some tens <strong>of</strong> soldiers to weigh more heavily than the lives <strong>of</strong> many tens <strong>of</strong>thousands <strong>of</strong> refugees. That is unlawful towards Plaintiff. Plaintiff and Foundation recallwhat was stated un<strong>der</strong> the facts, namely, that the Dutchbat soldiers concerned voluntarilyallowed themselves to be taken hostage by the VRS, while the Deputy BattalionComman<strong>der</strong> <strong>of</strong> Dutchbat, Major Franken, had dismissed the danger posed to thosesoldiers as he was certain that the VRS had every interest in not killing any UN soldiers(see page 2241 <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report). Finally, Plaintiff and Foundation note in thisconnection that not a single Dutchbat soldier was killed by the VRS.335. The facts and circumstances set out above lead to the conclusion that the UN and theState <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands unlawfully failed to fulfill their obligations or at least madeinsufficient efforts to do so.Unlawful acting by the UN and State <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands336. Should the obligation to provide the population with protection, or at least the obligationto make sufficient efforts thereto, not arise from agreement, then the failure <strong>of</strong>protection, or at least the failure to make sufficient efforts to ensure protection, is to becharacterized as unlawful conduct towards the population <strong>of</strong> the Safe Area, which© <strong>Van</strong> <strong>Diepen</strong> <strong>Van</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Kroef</strong> Advocaten 2007www.vandiepen.com145

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!