12.07.2015 Views

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

Writ of summons - Van Diepen Van der Kroef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

encountered objections from the Dutch government because this hard line against theBosnian Serbs could entail risks for the Dutch hostages. The Netherlands preferred use<strong>of</strong> the formulation, ‘to use his best efforts’. For this reason The Netherlands withdrew asco-proposer <strong>of</strong> the draft resolution. The draft resolution was, nevertheless, unanimouslyaccepted on 12 July 1995. Secretary-General Boutros-Ghali then instituted aninvestigation into the military means that would be required to achieve a restoration <strong>of</strong>the Safe Area by force. His military advisor, the Dutch <strong>Van</strong> Kappen, judged a plan toretake Srebrenica as unmanageable in military and political terms (see pages 296 and297 <strong>of</strong> the Summary <strong>of</strong> the NIOD Report). In the end nothing was done.271. After the women were deported from the Safe Area by bus to Tuzla, after the men andboys were taken away and mur<strong>der</strong>ed, Dutchbat left the area together with the freedhostages on 21 July 1995.272. In the week preceding their departure, Dutchbat neglected every attempt either throughan appeal for information or a form <strong>of</strong> debriefing to reveal information on possible veryserious violations <strong>of</strong> human rights. Both Franken and Karremans subsequently admittedthat they were amazed that they had not thought <strong>of</strong> doing so. Nor was anything done inthat respect higher up in the hierarchy <strong>of</strong> UNPROFOR (see page 2776 <strong>of</strong> the NIODReport).I.15. Individual circumstances <strong>of</strong> each Plaintiff273. The individual circumstances <strong>of</strong> each Plaintiff will be gone into in more detail below.Plaintiff refers for completeness to the statements that have been appended to this writ<strong>of</strong> <strong>summons</strong> as Exhibits 1 through 10. Each Plaintiff will confine herself essentially tothe family members she lost. Plaintiff was driven from hearth and home with the fall <strong>of</strong>the Safe Area and thereby lost all her personal possessions.Fejzić274. Plaintiff Fejzić was born in 1956, in the Municipality <strong>of</strong> Srebrenica. She lived before thewar in Srebrenica with her husband, Ŝaban (born in 1952), who worked as a manager atthe mine near Srebrenica. Fejzić and her husband had a son, Rijad, who was born in© <strong>Van</strong> <strong>Diepen</strong> <strong>Van</strong> <strong>der</strong> <strong>Kroef</strong> Advocaten 2007www.vandiepen.com121

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!