Herriman - Hi-Country Estates II

Herriman would cap the water connection fee for new connections and not chargeadditional impact fees for water.Herriman would conduct an Impact Fee analysis to determine the connection and impactfees that would be charged to new connections. The fees would need to pay forapproximately $7 million in new and upgraded water infrastructure. This cost would bethe burden of all existing and future home owners and developers.Monthly water fees would be comparable with the rest of Herriman City.Herriman would conduct a water rate analysis to determine the needed revenue forthe increased pumping cost due to the high elevation of HCE II water tanks, and theincreased maintenance cost of the deteriorating infrastructure and upgrades neededto bring the system to current DDW standards and regulations.2. Annexation into Herriman would remove the Salt Lake County's Foothills andCanyons Overlay Zone. Herriman would grandfather special zoning over HCEH toallow development of all property as originally planned, rural residential. In 1973 theentire subdivision was planned as residential building lots and should be able to becompleted as planned without the current FCOZ type restrictions or Forest Recreation2.5. The zoning would maintain the lot size at 2.5 acres. If there is clustering, all lostwould be divided by 2.5 acres to determine the number of homes possible in a cluster.Annexation into Herriman would remove the Salt Lake County's Foothills andCanyons Overlay Zone. Herriman would grandfather special zoning over HCEH toallow development of all property as originally planned, rural residential,Herriman City would annex the property with the same zoning they have in the county,which would likely be Forestry Recreation 2.5 (FR-2.5). The City does not have aFoothills and Canyons Overlay Zone, but is in the process of adopting a Hillside Overlayzone, which would apply to Hi Country if it were annexed.The zoning would maintain the lot size at 2.5 acres. If there is clustering, all lotswould be divided by 2.5 acres to determine the number of homes possible in a cluster.The City would maintain a density of one unit per 2.5 acres. If the property owners wishto work together to develop their properties, then homes could be clustered at a maximumdensity of one unit per 2.5 acres. This would potentially create much smaller buildinglots, while allowing more open space to remain on the unbuildable areas.3. There would be no ridgeline restrictions, or restrictions on house site slope, road slope,cuts across slopes and driveway slopes as long as they are property engineered.The current ridgeline restrictions found in the FR-2.5 zone would apply, as well as anyrestrictions in the new Hillside Overlay zone. The City does not allow homes to be built on