Enmore Park Plan of Management - Land

More documents

Recommendations

Info

URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING ARBORICULTURISTSTreeNo.Botanic & CommonName249 Ficus rubiginosaPort Jackson Fig250 Not present.*Hht(m)*Sp(m)*DBH(mm)13 16 900 M FairtoGoodAge *H *C Comments *SULE *LSR *RV *TPZOpt. &Min.FairSome dieback in upper crown. Old root damage – mowers. Deadwood >100mmØ to N/NW side.Decay in branch over park seat. Hanger in crown to S, over/above seat. Badly damaged branchlower W side.Remove deadwood >25mm. Reduce branch with decayed section overhanging seating.Mulch root zone (min. 4m radius where possible).2D H 4 10.89KEYARBORICULTURAL ASSESSMENTTrees to be retained. Individual trees (as noted) maybenefit from Crown Maintenance pruning as defined inAustralian Standard 4373-2007 Pruning of Amenity Trees.Trees that require specific attentionand/or further investigation ofidentified defects.Trees recommended for removal due topoor health and/or condition.AB - refers to the approximate diameter of a tree stem, measured immediately above the root buttress.AGL - above ground level.*H refers to the approximate height of a tree in metres, from base of stem to top of tree crown.*Sp refers to the approximate spread in metres, of branches/canopy of a tree.*DBH refers to the approximate diameter of tree stem at breast height i.e. 1.4 metres above ground (unless otherwise noted), and expressed in millimetres.Age Refer to Appendix A -Terms and Definitions for more detail.*H refers to the tree’s vigour (health) as exhibited by the crown density, leaf colour, presence of epicormic shoots, ability to withstand disease invasion, and the degree of dieback.*C refers to the tree’s form and growth habit, as modified by its environment (aspect, suppression by other trees, soils, etc.) and the state of the scaffold (i.e. trunk and major branches),including structural defects such as cavities, crooked trunks or weak trunk/branch junctions. These are not directly connected with health and it is possible for a tree to be healthy, but in poorcondition.*SULE refers to the estimated Safe Useful Life Expectancy of a tree. Refer to Appendix A -Terms and Definitions for more detail.Note: Where further investigation or testing of trees is required, a SULE cannot be accorded to those trees until these investigations have taken place.*LSR refers to the Landscape Significance Rating of a tree, considering the importance of the tree as a result of its prominence in the landscape and its amenity value, from the point of publicbenefit.o Exceptional (E) – Tree/s of crucial importance as a principal feature of a public place, or are so visually prominent as to be a landmark feature.o High (H) – prominent tree/s in private gardens or well-frequented public places.o Moderate (M) – Contributes some amenity to the immediate garden/landscape areas, or to the streetscape.o Low (L) – Poor, declining or small examples; noxious or undesirable species; little or no visual amenity to public view.Arboricultural Audit and Assessment– Enmore Park, Marrickville. January, 2008 32 of 42
URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING ARBORICULTURISTS*RV refers to the retention value of a tree, based on the tree’s Safe Useful Life Expectancy (SULE) and Landscape Significance.The RV is given as a subjective value as follows:Low (L) – The tree is dead, declining, and hazardous and has little or no amenity value.Medium (M) – Generally, the tree has a medium to high LSR and medium to short SULE.High (H) – Generally, the tree has a high LSR and medium to long term SULE, or the tree has a moderate to low LSR, no significant defects but a long term SULE.Note: Where further investigation or testing of trees is required, a retention value cannot be accorded to those trees until these investigations have taken place.*TPZ refers to the optimal tree protection zones for trees of ‘average to excellent vigour’. It is based on Matheny & Clark’s guidelines, as modified from the British Standards Institute 1991.Refer to Appendix A - Terms and Definitions for more detail.Note:o All figures refer to a radial offset in metres, measured from the centre of the tree’s trunk.o The optimal TPZ is calculated using the Matheny and Clark guidelines and converted to metric figures.o The minimum TPZ is calculated by using 10 times the tree DBH (excepting late-overmature of low vigour trees where the optimum TPZ only is to be used).o Trees of poor vigour are generally not considered for retention under this guideline.o Canopy spreads displayed on the survey are not accurately shown in many cases. Where a TPZ is displayed as a smaller diameter than the crown dripline, it is to be given that theTPZ is to be extended to the canopy dripline.o The minimum TPZ for a tree will not be less than 2 metres or greater than 15 metres.o Palms will have a TPZ of 1 metre outside the crown dripline.Arboricultural Audit and Assessment– Enmore Park, Marrickville. January, 2008 33 of 42
Page 1:
Enmore Parkplan of management + mas
Page 6 and 7:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTLis
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1Study AreaApril 20100 20 40
Page 10 and 11:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT1.5
Page 12 and 13:
Page 15:
Part APLAN OF MANAGEMENT13 Marrickv
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTExi
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 38 and 39:
0 20 40 MApril 2010Figure 4.2Master
Page 40 and 41:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT16.
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTNo.
Page 46 and 47:
Page 49 and 50:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORK6.
Page 51 and 52:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORK6.
Page 53 and 54:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORKOb
Page 55 and 56:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORKOb
Page 57:
Part CBACKGROUND55 Marrickville Cou
Page 60 and 61:
Newington CollegeTo NewtownCommunit
Page 62 and 63:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT193
Page 64 and 65:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 66 and 67:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
14.8"NO S TOPP INGBUS Z ONE"S IGN"B
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTPre
Page 78 and 79:
Page 81 and 82:
8.0 RELEVANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91:
9.0 APPENDIXABasis for ManagementSu
Page 94 and 95:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTThe
Page 97:
9.0 APPENDIXBHistorical Overview of
Page 100 and 101:
Conservation Management StrategyEnm
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119: Conservation Management StrategyEnm
Page 137 and 138: TREE MANAGEMENTCONSULTING ARBORICUL
Page 139 and 140: URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 167: URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 179: 9.0 APPENDIXCArboricultural Audit a
Page 218 and 219:
URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 225 and 226:
Enmore Park Draft Plan of Managemen
Page 227 and 228:
Enmore Park Draft Plan of Managemen
Page 229:
9.0 APPENDIXELighting Appraisal103
Page 232 and 233:
ut the security requirement may be
Page 234 and 235:
High Mast FittingsThere are a numbe
Page 236 and 237:
Appendix A is an excerpt from AS/NZ
Page 238 and 239:
Power SuppliesOur recent experience
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix BLighting, Art + ScienceEn
Page 242:
9.0 APPENDIXFBibliographyBenson D.
show all

Enmore Park Plan of Management - Land

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?