Enmore Park Plan of Management - Land

More documents

Recommendations

Info

URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING ARBORICULTURISTSTreeNo.Botanic & CommonName159 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box*Hht(m)*Sp(m)*DBH(mm)10 11 550 M Fair FairtoGoodAge *H *C Comments *SULE *LSR *RV *TPZOpt. &Min.Poor trunk flare at base of stem. Previously pollarded at 3 metres AGL. Large root ‘mass’ aboveground level. Form suppressed by adjacent Fig, T229. Extensive deadwood and dieback, butvigorous canopy. Leaning at 30º to vertical, towards Enmore Rd., with poor trunk flare at base onthat side (west).Remove deadwood >30mmØ over path. Mulch root zone (min. 2.5m radius where possible).Monitor lean and root plate.2D M H 6.65.5160 Ulmus parvifoliaChinese Elm161 Ulmus parvifoliaChinese Elm162 Ulmus parvifoliaChinese Elm6 7 150 SM Good Good Good form development will be compromised (suppressed) by canopy of adjacent Fig, T229.Minor dieback, probably from overshadowing of Fig. No obvious structural problems, unions notincluded. Exposed roots.Remove or reduce branch of Fig overhanging this Elm. Add some coarse free draining soil (depthless than 150mm) and mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction and root damage.8 8 300 SM Good Good Minor twiggy deadwood in crown interior. No special structural problems noted.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction.9 11 320 SM Good Good Small diameter deadwood in interior of canopy (
URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING ARBORICULTURISTSTreeNo.Botanic & CommonName169 Quercus palustrisPin Oak*Hht(m)*Sp(m)*DBH(mm)12 7 250 EM Good FairtoGoodAge *H *C Comments *SULE *LSR *RV *TPZOpt. &Min.Pin Oaks as avenue have medium landscape significance, low as individuals. Suppressed tosoutheast by T165. Co-dominant leaders at 4 metres AGL. Congested branch arrangementobscuring union of leaders.Thin crown by 20% to relieve congestion. Remove rubbing branches. Mulch over roots toalleviate soil compaction and root damage. Re-inspect union of double leaders after pruning.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction.1A L/M H 2.52.5170 Quercus palustrisPin Oak171 Quercus palustrisPin Oak172 Quercus palustrisPin Oak173 Quercus palustrisPin Oak9 6 200 EM Good Good Crown raised to 3 metres AGL. No significant defects.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction.8 7 200 EM Good Good Recently crown raised. Slight stem sweep at 1.8 metres AGL, to south. No significant defects.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction.7 7 200 EM Good Fair Co-dominant , included stems @ 1.7m AGL.. Minor small branch deadwood.Remove smaller stem (NE side) to encourage excurrent form. Mulch over roots to alleviate soilcompaction.8 8 200 EM Good Good Crown raised recently. Typical form and structure. Previously pruned with some blunt saw cuts.Remediate/trim cuts with sharp handsaw or secateurs as required. Mulch over roots to alleviatesoil compaction.1A L/M H 221A L/M H 221B L/M H 221A L/M H 22174 Quercus palustrisPin Oak11 8 260 SM FairtoGoodFairtoGoodCongested branch arrangement. Small, rubbing branches. Co-dominant leaders at 5 metres AGLto west. Recently crown lifted to 2.5 metres AGL.Remove western leader to encourage excurrent form. Mulch over roots to alleviate soilcompaction. After I year thin crown by 20% to relieve congestion. Remove rubbing branches.1B L/M H 2.62175 Quercus palustrisPin Oak176 Podocarpus elatusPlum Pine9 7 200 EM Good Good Co-dominant stems at 2.2 metres AGL. Recently crown raised. Some poor cutting, including cutsbehind branch collar, wounding. No significant defects.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction.8 6 320 SM Good - Heavily in fruit. Well balanced, symmetrical crown. Co-dominant leaders at 2.5 metres AGL.Some small branch inclusions in upper crown. Minor small rubbing branches,Aerial inspection of inner crown branch attachments required. Mulch over roots to alleviate soilcompaction.1A L/M H 22L 3.22177 Podocarpus elatusPlum Pine10 5.5 400@500AGLSMFairtoGoodFairtoGoodPoor extension growth to foliage from north side. Co-dominant at 1.4 metres AGL. Damage tolarge surface roots (exposed). Poorly pruned behind branch collars in the past, with resultant oldwounds. Active wound closure.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction.2D L M 3.63.6178 Podocarpus elatusPlum Pine9 7 450@500AGLSMFairtoGoodFairtoGoodCo-dominant at 1 and 1.6 metres AGL. Included union. Foliage a little yellow, upper crown thinnerthan typical.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction. Monitor stem inclusions.2D L M 44Arboricultural Audit and Assessment– Enmore Park, Marrickville. January, 2008 23 of 42
Page 1:
Enmore Parkplan of management + mas
Page 6 and 7:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTLis
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1Study AreaApril 20100 20 40
Page 10 and 11:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT1.5
Page 12 and 13:
Page 15:
Part APLAN OF MANAGEMENT13 Marrickv
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTExi
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 38 and 39:
0 20 40 MApril 2010Figure 4.2Master
Page 40 and 41:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT16.
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTNo.
Page 46 and 47:
Page 49 and 50:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORK6.
Page 51 and 52:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORK6.
Page 53 and 54:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORKOb
Page 55 and 56:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORKOb
Page 57:
Part CBACKGROUND55 Marrickville Cou
Page 60 and 61:
Newington CollegeTo NewtownCommunit
Page 62 and 63:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT193
Page 64 and 65:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 66 and 67:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
14.8"NO S TOPP INGBUS Z ONE"S IGN"B
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTPre
Page 78 and 79:
Page 81 and 82:
8.0 RELEVANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91:
9.0 APPENDIXABasis for ManagementSu
Page 94 and 95:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTThe
Page 97:
9.0 APPENDIXBHistorical Overview of
Page 100 and 101:
Conservation Management StrategyEnm
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109: Conservation Management StrategyEnm
Page 137 and 138: TREE MANAGEMENTCONSULTING ARBORICUL
Page 139 and 140: URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 157: URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 179: 9.0 APPENDIXCArboricultural Audit a
Page 208 and 209:
URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 225 and 226:
Enmore Park Draft Plan of Managemen
Page 227 and 228:
Enmore Park Draft Plan of Managemen
Page 229:
9.0 APPENDIXELighting Appraisal103
Page 232 and 233:
ut the security requirement may be
Page 234 and 235:
High Mast FittingsThere are a numbe
Page 236 and 237:
Appendix A is an excerpt from AS/NZ
Page 238 and 239:
Power SuppliesOur recent experience
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix BLighting, Art + ScienceEn
Page 242:
9.0 APPENDIXFBibliographyBenson D.
show all

Enmore Park Plan of Management - Land

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?