Enmore Park Plan of Management - Land

More documents

Recommendations

Info

URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING ARBORICULTURISTSTreeNo.Botanic & CommonName108 Ficus microcarpaSmall-fruited Fig*Hht(m)*Sp(m)*DBH(mm)9 16 970AB.Age *H *C Comments *SULE *LSR *RV *TPZOpt. &Min.MFairtoGood- Dominant tree in group. Extensive, exposed surface roots. Recent pruning of lower branches.Included junction of co-dominant stems, may require cabling. Large decay pocket in stem to east.Good canopy cover, even distribution. Extensive epicormics throughout scaffolds.Investigate requirement for cabling, in regard to potential removal of T107. Remove rubbingbranches. Remove deadwood >30mm Ø. Place coarse, free-draining soil between roots (not toexceed 150mm depth). Mulch root zone (min. 5m radius). Monitor.H 11.69.7109 Ficus rubiginosaPort Jackson Fig110 Ficus rubiginosaPort Jackson Fig9 10 650 M Fair - Previously topped at 4 - 5 metres AGL, resultant congested multi stems. Two large diameter tearoutson east side. Minor decay pockets in stem. Minor deadwood and dieback. Minor epicormics.Aerial inspection advised. Remove crossing/rubbing branches. Reduce loading on larger includedscaffolds, branch heading north. Highly compacted soil. Mulch root zone (min. 3.5m radius).Monitor.7 6 600 OM Poor Poor High landscape significance as group, low as individual specimen. Advanced decline. Heavilytopped. Roots cut and damaged. Extensive epicormics. Extensive dieback. Scaffolds reduced tostubs. Highly compacted soil.Remove.H/M 7.86.54A H/L L 99111 Ficus rubiginosaPort Jackson Fig10 20 1060ABM Fair - A dominant tree in group. Damaged, decayed surface roots. Epicormics throughout canopy, large(older) and small (recent). Epicormics probably a reaction to root damage. Large old wound atbase on north side, extent of decay not known. Vertical ‘inclusions’ in fluted stem, typical ofspecies. Major stem junctions not included. Previous pruning of damaged branches noted.Resistograph® test required to determine extent of decay. If retained remove larger diameterepicormics w/poor attachments. Mulch root zone (min. 5m radius). Monitor.H 12.710.6112 Ficus rubiginosaPort Jackson Fig9 10 900ABLM Poor - Very compacted soil, located next to bus stop. Extensive epicormics on stem and scaffolds, large(older) and small (recent). Some inclusions in junctions of large diameter branches. Previousbranch failures noted, have been removed. Root system appears to be limited due to compactionof soils, and may be insufficient to support tree. Tree is showing signs of decline and failures -may be best managed by gradual reduction of larger included branches, with view to safety, andonly short term retention of tree.Aerial inspection. Resistograph® test required to determine extent of decay. If retained removelarger diameter epicormics w/poor attachments. Mulch root zone (min. 4.5m radius). Monitor.H 13.513.5113 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box11 8 x10600 M Good Fair Previously topped at 3m AGL, resulting branches not too congested at regrowth point. Rootsgrowing over kerb edge of bus shelter area. Exposed roots, mower damaged. Compacted soils.Soil level under tree is higher than that of surrounding pavement, would ideally mulch under treebut it will wash off - raise kerb? If this is an option, do not cut root growing on kerb. Manageepicormics. Monitor.2D H H 7.26114 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box11 9 450 M Good FairtoGoodBolt in tree holding signs. Previously topped, not too congested, junctions appear sound. Mediumamount of epicormics. Soil very compacted. Line clearance on Enmore Road side due. Reducedroot system due to location in raised garden area, poor trunk basal flare to northwest.As above. Manage epicormics. Monitor.2D H H 5.44.5Arboricultural Audit and Assessment– Enmore Park, Marrickville. January, 2008 16 of 42
URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MANAGEMENT & CONSULTING ARBORICULTURISTSTreeNo.Botanic & CommonName115 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box*Hht(m)*Sp(m)*DBH(mm)9 9 400 M Fair PoortoFairAge *H *C Comments *SULE *LSR *RV *TPZOpt. &Min.Large root mass at base. Some deadwood and dieback. Previously topped at 4 metres AGL.Sparse canopy.Where possible mulch root zone (min. 2m radius). Monitor.2D M M 4.84116 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box15 13 750 M Good Fair Poor trunk basal flare. Old topping at 3 metres AGL, congested on Enmore Road side (west).Branch junctions not included, although some junctions are poorly attached epicormics.Remove some branches from congested area to west to reduce potential for failure. Wherepossible mulch root zone (min. 2m radius). Monitor.2A H H 97.5117 Ulmus parvifoliaChinese Elm6 11 220 SM Good FairtoGoodPoor trunk flare on west side. Form otherwise good.Remove crossing/rubbing branches. Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction and rootdamage. Monitor.2D M M 2.22118 Ulmus parvifoliaChinese Elm6 11 300 SM Good FairtoGoodRecently pruned. Sparser canopy than others in group. Some small epicormics in scaffolds,possibly caused by girdled roots, stress. Leaning but self-corrected.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction and root damage. Monitor.2D M M 33119 Ulmus parvifoliaChinese Elm5 9 220 SM Good Good No obvious problems.Mulch over roots to alleviate soil compaction and root damage.2A M M 2.22120 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box7 4 - 5 190 SM FairtoGoodFairtoGoodSome fungal spots on leaves. Poor trunk taper at base on western side. Exposed, mowerdamagedroots. Compacted soil. Has had some lower branches ‘ripped off’ flush (vandals),possible decay entry points.Clean cut wounds where possible. Raise crown to avoid future damage. Mulch over roots toalleviate soil compaction and root damage. Monitor.2A M H 22121 Lophostemon confertusBrush Box122 Washingtonia filiferaAmerican Cotton Palm123 Washingtonia filiferaAmerican Cotton Palm124 Washingtonia filiferaAmerican Cotton Palm125 Washingtonia filiferaAmerican Cotton Palm6 4 150 SM Good Good Terminal intact. Good trunk flare at base. Some damaged/torn lower branches, with dieback.Raise crown to avoid future damage. Cut torn branches to bark collar. Mulch over roots toalleviate soil compaction and root damage.6 5 550 M Good Good High landscape significance as avenue, medium as individual specimen.No special problems visibly apparent at time of inspection.5 4 500 M Good Good High landscape significance as avenue, medium as individual specimen. No special problemsvisibly apparent at time of inspection.6 5 550 M Good Good High landscape significance as avenue, medium as individual specimen. No special problemsvisibly apparent at time of inspection.6 5 550 M Good Good High landscape significance as avenue, medium as individual specimen. No special problemsvisibly apparent at time of inspection.2A M H 221A H/M H 3.53.51A H/M H 331A H/M H 3.53.51A H/M H 3.53.5Arboricultural Audit and Assessment– Enmore Park, Marrickville. January, 2008 17 of 42
Page 1:
Enmore Parkplan of management + mas
Page 6 and 7:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTLis
Page 8 and 9:
Figure 1Study AreaApril 20100 20 40
Page 10 and 11:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT1.5
Page 12 and 13:
Page 15:
Part APLAN OF MANAGEMENT13 Marrickv
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTExi
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 38 and 39:
0 20 40 MApril 2010Figure 4.2Master
Page 40 and 41:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT16.
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTNo.
Page 46 and 47:
Page 49 and 50:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORK6.
Page 51 and 52:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORK6.
Page 53 and 54:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORKOb
Page 55 and 56:
6.0 MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FRAMEWORKOb
Page 57:
Part CBACKGROUND55 Marrickville Cou
Page 60 and 61:
Newington CollegeTo NewtownCommunit
Page 62 and 63:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENT193
Page 64 and 65:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 66 and 67:
10. 810 .810.810.810. 610.610 .610.
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
14.8"NO S TOPP INGBUS Z ONE"S IGN"B
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTPre
Page 78 and 79:
Page 81 and 82:
8.0 RELEVANT BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91:
9.0 APPENDIXABasis for ManagementSu
Page 94 and 95:
ENMORE PARK - PLAN OF MANAGEMENTThe
Page 97:
9.0 APPENDIXBHistorical Overview of
Page 100 and 101:
Conservation Management StrategyEnm
Page 102 and 103: Conservation Management StrategyEnm
Page 137 and 138: TREE MANAGEMENTCONSULTING ARBORICUL
Page 139 and 140: URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 151: URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 179: 9.0 APPENDIXCArboricultural Audit a
Page 202 and 203:
URBAN FORESTRY AUSTRALIA - TREE MAN
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 225 and 226:
Enmore Park Draft Plan of Managemen
Page 227 and 228:
Enmore Park Draft Plan of Managemen
Page 229:
9.0 APPENDIXELighting Appraisal103
Page 232 and 233:
ut the security requirement may be
Page 234 and 235:
High Mast FittingsThere are a numbe
Page 236 and 237:
Appendix A is an excerpt from AS/NZ
Page 238 and 239:
Power SuppliesOur recent experience
Page 240 and 241:
Appendix BLighting, Art + ScienceEn
Page 242:
9.0 APPENDIXFBibliographyBenson D.
show all

Enmore Park Plan of Management - Land

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?