12.07.2015 Views

A Familiar Frontier: The Kennedy Administration in the Congo ...

A Familiar Frontier: The Kennedy Administration in the Congo ...

A Familiar Frontier: The Kennedy Administration in the Congo ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

only as Hammarskjold’s bodyguard. 17 On August 14, <strong>the</strong> Belgians formally turned powerover to <strong>the</strong> new U.N. force, with troops from neutral African countries jo<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>Swedes <strong>in</strong> Katanga <strong>in</strong> a matter of days. Hammarskjold felt that br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> U.N. force toElisabethville without bloodshed had been a tremendous achievement, but Lumumba didnot feel <strong>the</strong> same way. Lumumba had wanted to accompany Hammarskjold toElisabethville and to use U.N. planes to br<strong>in</strong>g his own troops <strong>in</strong> to crush <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>surrection.Instead, Hammarskjold had chosen to sidestep Lumumba and confer directly withTshombe, seem<strong>in</strong>g to grant legitimacy to an <strong>in</strong>dependent Katanga.Lumumba wrote <strong>the</strong> Secretary-General a series of angry letters, accus<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> U.N.of “act<strong>in</strong>g as though my government…did not exist” and declar<strong>in</strong>g ostentatiously that“<strong>the</strong> government and people of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> have lost <strong>the</strong>ir confidence <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Secretary-General.” 18 Lumumba was also extremely critical of <strong>the</strong> U.N. for us<strong>in</strong>g only Swedishtroops at <strong>the</strong> outset. “How can you imag<strong>in</strong>e, just like that, a hat pa<strong>in</strong>ted blue is enough toelim<strong>in</strong>ate <strong>the</strong> complexes of conservative officers from Sweden or Canada or GreatBrita<strong>in</strong>?” he asked a journalist. It was clear to Lumumba that <strong>the</strong> U.N. soldiers wouldtake <strong>the</strong> Belgian side, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y shared “<strong>the</strong> same past, <strong>the</strong> same history, <strong>the</strong> same tastefor our riches.” 19 At a meet<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> National Security Council, <strong>the</strong> view was advancedthat <strong>the</strong> letters may have been written as part of a communist conspiracy: “Hammarskjoldbelieves that <strong>the</strong>y were written by a Belgian Communist who is Lumumba’s chief ofcab<strong>in</strong>et. O<strong>the</strong>rs, however, th<strong>in</strong>k that a Soviet attaché <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Congo</strong>, who has hadextensive UN experience, may have been <strong>the</strong> author.” 20 <strong>The</strong> U.S. Embassy <strong>in</strong> Brussels17 Kalb, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> Cables, 4818 Qtd. <strong>in</strong> Kalb, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> Cables, 4819 Qtd. <strong>in</strong> Kalb, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> Cables, 49-5020 Memo of National Security Meet<strong>in</strong>g, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:42276

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!