A Familiar Frontier: The Kennedy Administration in the Congo ...

A Familiar Frontier: The Kennedy Administration in the Congo ... A Familiar Frontier: The Kennedy Administration in the Congo ...

bir.brandeis.edu
from bir.brandeis.edu More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Once again, however, State Department officials needed the presence of all majorfactions for the decisions made to be viewed as legitimate. G. Mennen Williams andChester Bowles were among those at State who felt that the best way to respond to theperceived communist threat in the Congo was to incorporate a few representatives of thatelement and encourage them to participate within the system. This was a clear departurefrom Eisenhower-era thinking, and Kennedy’s improved relations with leftist leaders inGhana and Guinea were the clearest example of this method. However, like many of thechanges in the Kennedy Administration, the reality did not live up to the highexpectations that Kennedy had created with his rhetoric. Indeed, the extent to which thisrepresented a genuine change in perspective is called into question by the StateDepartment recommendation that Gizenga be offered a “non-sensitive post in otherwisemoderate cabinet with strong Prime Minister.” 35 Ambassador Timberlake and officials inthe Defense Department openly questioned whether even this largely ceremonial positionwas not too much of a capitulation to radical forces. As recently as May 10, Bowles hadsaid of Gizenga, “we consider him completely responsive at present to foreign direction,”a sentiment certainly not shared by the Soviets, whose earlier denial of aid meant thattheir influence with the enigmatic leader was minimal. 36Timberlake’s perspective was noted, but little more than that, as he would soon beremoved from his position as part of a deal with Hammarskjold to replace the deeplyunpopular Dayal. Despite his best efforts, Dayal had drawn scorn from virtually allparties, with Mobutu even threatening to assassinate him and use his own forces againstthe U.N. troops if Dayal returned to the Congo. The U.S. State Department had tried to35 Telegram from Bowles to Timberlake, FRUS, 1961-1963, 20:14336 Telegram from Bowles to U.S. Mission at U.N., FRUS, 1961-1963, 20:13655

secure his removal “on the ground that he is biased in favor of Lumumba,” a claim thatLumumba would have vigorously denied. 37 Recognizing that discretion was the betterpart of valor, Dayal resigned, but not before Hammarskjold secured the prematureremoval of his rivals, Timberlake and British Ambassador Scott, in exchange. The pro-Africa wing of the State Department must have felt like they had won a double victory byremoving Dayal as well as the obstinate and outspoken Timberlake.Timberlake’s disagreement with Administration policy on the involvement ofGizenga was only the latest in a long line of incidents, including a potentially disastrousrecommendation to move a U.S. Navy task force in the Atlantic to the port of Matadiwithout anyone else’s authorization. 38 It is easy to see the limits of Kennedy’s supposedemphasis on Africa here, that during a period of civil war and fear of a communisttakeover, the U.S. was willing to leave itself with an ambassador all summer. EdmundGullion would succeed Timberlake, but he would be busy working on disarmamentissues until the end of August, so the deputy chief of mission McMurtrie Godley was leftto act in the capacity of ambassador for more than two months.The low priority assigned to Africa was evident in the Vienna meeting betweenKennedy and Khrushchev that June: issues related to the Congo were pushed aside infavor of Laos (where a peaceful settlement was reached) and Berlin (where the lack ofagreement led up to the Berlin crisis and the erection of the Wall). The precedent of aneutral coalition government in Laos did lead the Kennedy team to believe that theSoviets would be willing to accept a similar solution in the Congo, where their positionwas even weaker. At the same time, the Gizengists privately acknowledged that they had37 Analytical Chronology, 1/25/61, President’s Office Files, Box 114, Folder 1438 Memo from McNamara to Rusk, National Security Files, Box 27a, Folder: Congo General 1/61-4/6156

secure his removal “on <strong>the</strong> ground that he is biased <strong>in</strong> favor of Lumumba,” a claim thatLumumba would have vigorously denied. 37 Recogniz<strong>in</strong>g that discretion was <strong>the</strong> betterpart of valor, Dayal resigned, but not before Hammarskjold secured <strong>the</strong> prematureremoval of his rivals, Timberlake and British Ambassador Scott, <strong>in</strong> exchange. <strong>The</strong> pro-Africa w<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> State Department must have felt like <strong>the</strong>y had won a double victory byremov<strong>in</strong>g Dayal as well as <strong>the</strong> obst<strong>in</strong>ate and outspoken Timberlake.Timberlake’s disagreement with <strong>Adm<strong>in</strong>istration</strong> policy on <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>volvement ofGizenga was only <strong>the</strong> latest <strong>in</strong> a long l<strong>in</strong>e of <strong>in</strong>cidents, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g a potentially disastrousrecommendation to move a U.S. Navy task force <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Atlantic to <strong>the</strong> port of Matadiwithout anyone else’s authorization. 38 It is easy to see <strong>the</strong> limits of <strong>Kennedy</strong>’s supposedemphasis on Africa here, that dur<strong>in</strong>g a period of civil war and fear of a communisttakeover, <strong>the</strong> U.S. was will<strong>in</strong>g to leave itself with an ambassador all summer. EdmundGullion would succeed Timberlake, but he would be busy work<strong>in</strong>g on disarmamentissues until <strong>the</strong> end of August, so <strong>the</strong> deputy chief of mission McMurtrie Godley was leftto act <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> capacity of ambassador for more than two months.<strong>The</strong> low priority assigned to Africa was evident <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Vienna meet<strong>in</strong>g between<strong>Kennedy</strong> and Khrushchev that June: issues related to <strong>the</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> were pushed aside <strong>in</strong>favor of Laos (where a peaceful settlement was reached) and Berl<strong>in</strong> (where <strong>the</strong> lack ofagreement led up to <strong>the</strong> Berl<strong>in</strong> crisis and <strong>the</strong> erection of <strong>the</strong> Wall). <strong>The</strong> precedent of aneutral coalition government <strong>in</strong> Laos did lead <strong>the</strong> <strong>Kennedy</strong> team to believe that <strong>the</strong>Soviets would be will<strong>in</strong>g to accept a similar solution <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Congo</strong>, where <strong>the</strong>ir positionwas even weaker. At <strong>the</strong> same time, <strong>the</strong> Gizengists privately acknowledged that <strong>the</strong>y had37 Analytical Chronology, 1/25/61, President’s Office Files, Box 114, Folder 1438 Memo from McNamara to Rusk, National Security Files, Box 27a, Folder: <strong>Congo</strong> General 1/61-4/6156

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!