Gizenga was a committed Marxist, more solidly radical than Lumumba, while Bombokowas probably <strong>the</strong> most pro-Western figure <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> government, and had made a name forhimself a few days earlier, by putt<strong>in</strong>g himself <strong>in</strong> danger to rescue Belgian civilians frommut<strong>in</strong>ous soldiers. Timberlake counseled patience, say<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> U.N. could not movemuch faster, while go<strong>in</strong>g on to state that he did not anticipate that <strong>the</strong> U.S. would bewill<strong>in</strong>g to send troops outside of <strong>the</strong> U.N. mandate as <strong>the</strong>y were request<strong>in</strong>g. 11 He adopteda somewhat different position <strong>in</strong> his telephone call to <strong>the</strong> State Department, when headvised that two companies of U.S. Army <strong>in</strong>fantry which had been put on stand-by status<strong>in</strong> Germany to evacuate refugees “should be flown down to Brazzaville,” across <strong>the</strong> riverfrom Leopoldville. “<strong>The</strong>ir presence <strong>the</strong>re would have a very desirable effect.” 12In a private telephone call with Secretary of State Christian Herter, PresidentEisenhower echoed Timberlake’s position with <strong>the</strong> Cab<strong>in</strong>et m<strong>in</strong>isters, repeat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> samelanguage throughout <strong>the</strong> conversation. Eisenhower expla<strong>in</strong>ed that “we are always will<strong>in</strong>gto do our duty through <strong>the</strong> UN but we are not go<strong>in</strong>g to unilaterally get <strong>in</strong>to this…wewould be completely <strong>in</strong> error to go <strong>in</strong> unilaterally.” 13 <strong>Kennedy</strong> had well aware of this wayof th<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Eisenhower <strong>Adm<strong>in</strong>istration</strong>, remark<strong>in</strong>g that when it came to <strong>the</strong>develop<strong>in</strong>g world, <strong>the</strong>re was an “obvious desire not to become <strong>in</strong>volved.” 14 Indeed,Eisenhower’s discomfort was not limited to a unilateral American move: Herter said hewas “very adverse to send<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> our troops <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se circumstances. <strong>The</strong> President said thatwas right; that he didn’t th<strong>in</strong>k any Western troops should go <strong>in</strong>.” 15 In this situation, <strong>the</strong>President and <strong>the</strong> Secretary of State agreed that <strong>the</strong>re was no benefit for America to get11 Kalb, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> Cables, 912 Telegram from John S.D. Eisenhower to Andrew Goodpaster, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:29413 Memo of Telephone Conversation between Eisenhower and Herter, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:29614 Qtd. <strong>in</strong> Mahoney, JFK: Ordeal <strong>in</strong> Africa, 2015 Memo of Telephone Conversation between Eisenhower and Herter, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:29619
<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> central Africa, when <strong>the</strong> United Nations can do that job for <strong>the</strong>m. In fact,when Herter mentioned that <strong>the</strong> country was experienc<strong>in</strong>g a major food shortage,Eisenhower “commented maybe after this situation some of <strong>the</strong>se people won’t want nowto be <strong>in</strong>dependent.” 16 Herter passed this decision on to Timberlake, expla<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong>U.S. would not send <strong>in</strong> troops outside of <strong>the</strong> U.N. framework, and was hesitant to do soeven with<strong>in</strong> it. 17This would prove to be a moot po<strong>in</strong>t, as Lumumba was furious to f<strong>in</strong>d out thatGizenga and Bomboko had requested U.S. troops to <strong>in</strong>tervene without his approval. Hehad been out of <strong>the</strong> capital, work<strong>in</strong>g with Kasavubu on a second request to <strong>the</strong> UnitedNations. This new version altered <strong>the</strong> terms of <strong>the</strong>ir orig<strong>in</strong>al request so that <strong>the</strong> <strong>Congo</strong>now asked for “urgent dispatch” of U.N. soldiers to protect <strong>the</strong> country from <strong>the</strong>unauthorized Belgian troops, which represented an “act of aggression.” 18 Belgian forceshad acted on <strong>the</strong>ir own <strong>in</strong>itiative to bombard <strong>the</strong> city of Matadi, <strong>in</strong> an effort to secure <strong>the</strong>nation’s chief port from mut<strong>in</strong>ous <strong>Congo</strong>lese soldiers. This attack was particularlydistress<strong>in</strong>g to Lumumba, both because of its proximity to Leopoldville and <strong>the</strong> high deathtolls be<strong>in</strong>g reported, soon revealed to be hugely exaggerated. <strong>The</strong> attack on Matadi<strong>in</strong>spired Lumumba’s second dispatch to <strong>the</strong> U.N., which also attributed <strong>the</strong> Katangeseseccession to Belgian <strong>in</strong>fluence and promised to turn to <strong>the</strong> “Bandung Treaty Powers” if<strong>the</strong> U.N. did not act without delay. 19 Lumumba refers here to <strong>the</strong> nascent non-alignedmovement, a bloc of African and Asian states that had started to band toge<strong>the</strong>r at 1955’s16 Memo of Telephone Conversation between Eisenhower and Herter, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:29617 Telegram from Herter to Timberlake, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:29818 Kalb, <strong>The</strong> <strong>Congo</strong> Cables, 9-1019 Memo of Telephone Conversation between Eisenhower and Herter, FRUS, 1958-1960, 14:300, Note 220
- Page 3: TABLE OF CONTENTSIntroduction 1Chap
- Page 6 and 7: adical and his party had won a plur
- Page 8 and 9: Kennedy intended it to apply to for
- Page 10 and 11: in terms of American interest or to
- Page 12 and 13: found a precedent in the actions of
- Page 14 and 15: willingness to tolerate him because
- Page 16 and 17: advisers were paying much attention
- Page 18 and 19: A year later, responding to the pre
- Page 20 and 21: On July 11, a few events dramatical
- Page 24 and 25: Bandung Conference to offer a third
- Page 26 and 27: the U.S.S.R. in the Congo: “For t
- Page 28 and 29: Indeed, Lumumba was a wild card, an
- Page 30 and 31: position from which they conspicuou
- Page 32 and 33: Lumumba’s erratic personal added
- Page 34 and 35: the President, especially in writte
- Page 36 and 37: took to the airwaves to dismiss Pri
- Page 38 and 39: to outside world that Lumumba was b
- Page 40 and 41: embassies of the U.S.S.R. and Czech
- Page 42 and 43: ather than take a ministerial post
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter Two:LEOPOLDVILLEEvents in t
- Page 46 and 47: assessment is valid, but it had lit
- Page 48 and 49: damage to his reputation among Afri
- Page 50 and 51: U.S. Ambassador Clare Timberlake su
- Page 52 and 53: would not respond any better to a n
- Page 54 and 55: about a greater degree of Congolese
- Page 56 and 57: will place yet another strain on NA
- Page 58 and 59: Once again, however, State Departme
- Page 60 and 61: overstepped their influence by tryi
- Page 62 and 63: ecommends that we permit the presen
- Page 64 and 65: States would only accept the best o
- Page 66 and 67: government was “as good as we cou
- Page 68 and 69: he wants Katanga to stay in Congo a
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter Three:ELISABETHVILLEThe Con
- Page 72 and 73:
stability in Katanga, and in neighb
- Page 74 and 75:
eminder of the low priority that Ei
- Page 76 and 77:
gentle and realistic tack with the
- Page 78 and 79:
without too much damage in Europe.
- Page 80 and 81:
also warned the State Department ab
- Page 82 and 83:
military action from turning into a
- Page 84 and 85:
The events of August 1960 impressed
- Page 86 and 87:
pointed out he had taken major risk
- Page 88 and 89:
announced to the press that “this
- Page 90 and 91:
evidence for such an outcome. On th
- Page 92 and 93:
after the cease-fire, leading to th
- Page 94 and 95:
especially by Union Miniére, which
- Page 96 and 97:
ConclusionEvents in the Congo turne
- Page 98 and 99:
Congo crisis began well before Amer
- Page 100 and 101:
BibliographyHoskyns, Catherine. The