Mr Robinson said DALRO assumed the publishers that gave it the m<strong>and</strong>ate to license the reproduction of theirpublications were permitted by the holders of the copyrights in the literary works to authorise DALRO in turn tolicense the reproduction of the literary works as well as the typographical arrangement thereof. In a subsequentconversation with the chairperson of the CRC, Mr Robinson stated that DALRO assumed that the publisherspaid over to the authors such portions of the royalties received as they were entitled to. The documentationaccompanying the payment by DALRO clearly identified each author <strong>and</strong> how much of his or her work had beencopied. He added that if requested to do so, <strong>and</strong> given the address or banking details of the authors, DALROwould be able <strong>and</strong> willing to make the necessary payments to the authors.9.2.9. The tariffs, subject to which both blanket <strong>and</strong> transactional licences are issued, <strong>and</strong> the commissions payable toDALRO appear acceptable. They are the product of negotiation between the parties. The blanket licence tariffwas negotiated in collaboration with the Department of Education. The CRC, however, has a problem withlicences that permit Section 6 (a) rights to be exercised. From information received by the CRC, it appears thatsome of the authors of articles (of which the authors hold the copyright in the literary work) published in SouthAfrican journals <strong>and</strong> reproduced under licences issued by DALRO, have neither authorised the reproduction ofthe articles nor received any portion of the royalties paid to the publishers by DALRO.9.3 RECOMMENDATIONS9.3.1. While the CRC accepts that the assumptions made by DALRO, to which Mr Robinson referred, were made ingood faith, it strongly recommends that DALRO take urgent steps to satisfy itself that the local publishers thatm<strong>and</strong>ate it to license articles are entitled to give such m<strong>and</strong>ates, not only in respect of Section 11A rights, butalso in respect of rights arising under Section 6 (a) <strong>and</strong>, furthermore, where articles have been copied underlicences issued, that the persons who hold the Section 6 (a) rights receive the royalties to which they areentitled.10 DISTRIBUTIONS OF MUSIC ROYALTIES10.1 OVERVIEW OF ROYALTY DISTRIBUTIONSTable 16: Utilisation of Royalty CollectionsRefs.Details2010Rm’s2009Rm’s2008Rm’sa.b.c.d.Total Royalty Income Collected (as per Table 4)Unclaimed Royalties Written BackNORM’s CollectionsAdministration Expenses357,9 322,4 293,725,5 40,4 29,4(17,8) (20,6) (11,4)(103,2) (94,2) (75,3)- 70 -
Refs.Details2010Rm’s2009Rm’s2008Rm’se.f.Social <strong>and</strong> Cultural AllocationsNet revenue for SAMPRA (unavailable fordistributions)(16,3) (14,5) (14,6)(30,5) (20,1) (15,1)g. Undocumented Works <strong>and</strong> Non-Members RoyaltiesNot yetavailable(33,0) (27,5)h. Transfers from / (to) Reserves <strong>and</strong> Tax Not relevant (1,2) (21,1)i. SAMRO’s Cash Available for DistributionsNot yetavailable179,2 158,1Table 17: Cash Distributed by SAMRORefs. Details 2009 2008 2007RM’s % RM’s % RM’s %j. Local Composers <strong>and</strong> Authors 43,2 24,1 39,6 25,1 30,5 24,9k. Beneficiaries 1,4 0,8 1,1 0,7 0,9 0,7l. Publishers 57,4 32,1 49,7 31,4 38,6 31,4m. Foreign Collecting Societies 77,2 43,0 67,7 42,8 52,6 42,9n. Total Distributions (As in Table 16) 179,2 100,0 158,1 100,0 122,6 100,010.1.1. The total collections for music royalties (performance, needletime <strong>and</strong> mechanical rights) for 2010 amounted toapproximately R357,9 million. Over <strong>and</strong> above the royalty collections, SAMRO has investments in excess ofR300 million in different classes of assets. Over the last three years, these investments generated income ofbetween R41 million <strong>and</strong> R66 million per annum. The investment income is eligible for distribution.10.1.2. The administration expenses pertain to the overhead costs for the two collecting societies (SAMRO <strong>and</strong>SAMPRA).10.1.3. SAMRO is the only local collecting society that sets aside cash for social <strong>and</strong> cultural activities.10.1.4. Due to the legal case involving SAMPRA, SAMRO <strong>and</strong> the Registrar, SAMPRA has not yet managed todistribute royalties for sound recordings. The total net amount (excluding investment income) collected bySAMPRA during the last three completed financial periods is R66,2 million (R15,2 million + R20,5 million +R30,5 million).10.1.5. Royalty payments are made after the completion of the financial year in which they were collected from theusers. The distribution details for the 2010 financial year were not available at the time of compiling this report<strong>and</strong> so the details for the 2007 financial year were included in Table 17 to compare the three-year trend.- 71 -
- Page 2 and 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF ABBREVIATI
- Page 4 and 5:
11.8 RECOMMENDATIONS ..............
- Page 6 and 7:
LIST OF TABLESTable 1: Cases of Non
- Page 8 and 9:
NORMOSPsPOSAPPLPPL (India)ProLitter
- Page 10 and 11:
These problems are addressed in the
- Page 12 and 13:
xxi.The report considers developmen
- Page 14 and 15:
1.3.8. Determine whether all money
- Page 16 and 17:
1.4.9. The CRC derived considerable
- Page 18 and 19:
2.3 SUBMISSION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
- Page 20 and 21:
Aspects of Intellectual Property Ri
- Page 22 and 23:
(1) Subject to the provisions of th
- Page 24 and 25:
Copyright Tribunal or an arbitrator
- Page 26 and 27: society, the South African Recordin
- Page 28 and 29: 3.2.14. With the liquidation of SAR
- Page 30 and 31: the final rate or rates to be appli
- Page 32 and 33: (a)that payment is to be made to th
- Page 34 and 35: information as to their use to enab
- Page 36 and 37: The WCT and WPPT oblige members to
- Page 38 and 39: Once the handset technology changed
- Page 40 and 41: 4.3.16. In 2009, in what was coined
- Page 42 and 43: 4.4.6. In exchange for the above li
- Page 44 and 45: operators are licensed by NORM to p
- Page 46 and 47: 5.2 FUNCTIONING OF COLLECTING SOCIE
- Page 48 and 49: the grant of licences. Article 17 o
- Page 50 and 51: 6.1.3. The CRC’s assessment of th
- Page 52 and 53: 6.3.3. SAMPRA should be given one y
- Page 54 and 55: Corporate Governance GapsKing II Re
- Page 56 and 57: King IIIPrincipleKing IIIRequiremen
- Page 58 and 59: King IIIPrincipleKing IIIRequiremen
- Page 60 and 61: 8 COLLECTION OF MUSIC ROYALTIES8.1
- Page 62 and 63: 8.1.4.2. Needletime royalties are n
- Page 64 and 65: 8.1.7.4. For the past five years, V
- Page 66 and 67: PRS (UK)SPRE (FRANCE)SUISA(SWITZERL
- Page 68 and 69: DetailsPerformance RightsSound Reco
- Page 70 and 71: 8.2.7 Comparative Study Performed b
- Page 72 and 73: y a collecting society. A rights ho
- Page 74 and 75: agency, its rights being derived fr
- Page 78 and 79: 10.1.6. The distribution to publish
- Page 80 and 81: 10.4.4. Most of the other collectin
- Page 82 and 83: 10.6.3.4. South African English-lis
- Page 84 and 85: 10.10 CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS BET
- Page 86 and 87: 10.12.2. The Regulations should rec
- Page 88 and 89: licence that the licensee comply wi
- Page 90 and 91: 11.4.6. The details of ICASA’s ta
- Page 92 and 93: RecommendationsTimelines for Recomm
- Page 94 and 95: enterprises. There was a suggestion
- Page 96 and 97: Copyright as it relates to copyrigh
- Page 98 and 99: 13.4 DEPARTMENT OF ARTS AND CULTURE
- Page 100 and 101: Table 28: Comparative Study’s Key
- Page 102 and 103: KEY ITEMS BRAZIL FRANCE INDIA NORWA
- Page 104 and 105: KEY ITEMS BRAZIL FRANCE INDIA NORWA
- Page 106 and 107: about 30%, which is the highest amo
- Page 108 and 109: 15.1.3. The Copyright Tribunal’s
- Page 110 and 111: 15.1.20. Local music content requir
- Page 112 and 113: for the selected artists. The outco
- Page 114 and 115: King III Report by Institute of Dir
- Page 116 and 117: Paranagua Pedro, “Strategies to I
- Page 118 and 119: Copyright Amendment Act of 1984Copy
- Page 120 and 121: APPENDIX 1(B): SUMMARY OF ORAL REPR
- Page 122 and 123: Due to the fact that the existing c
- Page 124 and 125: Mr BrottelProtection of copyright m
- Page 126 and 127:
1.1.3. LIST OF ENTITIES VISITED AND
- Page 128 and 129:
In the 2009 Annual Report of ABRAMU
- Page 130 and 131:
The implementation of this law led
- Page 132 and 133:
ecordings. In respect of audio-visu
- Page 134 and 135:
In 1995, ECAD distributed 72% of it
- Page 136 and 137:
niches in the market to ensure fair
- Page 138 and 139:
Proprietary rights allow authors to
- Page 140 and 141:
International royalty distribution
- Page 142 and 143:
3.2. Relevant LegislationsThe prese
- Page 144 and 145:
IPRS uses the standard tariffs in r
- Page 146 and 147:
Ad-hoc workshops on copyright are c
- Page 148 and 149:
meaningful living out of their crea
- Page 150 and 151:
4.1.3. LICENSING AND LEGAL REGIMESI
- Page 152 and 153:
Ballet teachers; Teachers in the fi
- Page 154 and 155:
It was founded in 1928 by the Norwe
- Page 156 and 157:
6.2. STRUCTURE OF COLLECTING SOCIET
- Page 158 and 159:
6.5. COLLECTION OF MUSIC ROYALTIEST
- Page 160 and 161:
1957, when the Managing Director of
- Page 162 and 163:
16.4.14 SWISSPERFORM: CHF4 millionI
- Page 164 and 165:
Cross-border licensing of digital r
- Page 166 and 167:
algorithm could be used to determin
- Page 168 and 169:
Collecting societies in the UK all
- Page 170 and 171:
APPENDIX 3: RECOMMENDATIONS BY MITT
- Page 172 and 173:
1.PREAMBLEThe Music Industry Task T
- Page 174 and 175:
The environment in which the music
- Page 176 and 177:
3.1.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND ACCESSION
- Page 178 and 179:
In this regard, the Minister should
- Page 180 and 181:
3.5.6 OMBUDSMANThe music industry s
- Page 182 and 183:
RECOMMENDATION 23:The MITT recommen
- Page 184 and 185:
The MITT further recommends that DA
- Page 186 and 187:
APPENDIX 4A: EXTRACTS FROM COPYRIGH
- Page 188 and 189:
(f)(g)doing, in relation to an adap
- Page 190 and 191:
(i)requiring notice of any intended
- Page 192 and 193:
(b)any organization claiming to be
- Page 194 and 195:
PERFORMERS’ PROTECTION ACTNO. 11
- Page 196 and 197:
the parties may agree to refer the
- Page 198 and 199:
- 192 -
- Page 200 and 201:
- 194 -
- Page 202 and 203:
- 196 -
- Page 204 and 205:
- 198 -
- Page 206 and 207:
ANNEXURE 5: COPY OF SARRAL’S CONT
- Page 208 and 209:
- 202 -
- Page 210 and 211:
ANNEXURE 6: SARRAL’S AUDIT REPORT
- Page 212 and 213:
- 206 -
- Page 214 and 215:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 216 and 217:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 218 and 219:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 220 and 221:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 222 and 223:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 224:
- 218 -