8 COLLECTION OF MUSIC ROYALTIES8.1 OVERVIEW OF COLLECTION ACTIVITIES8.1.1 Background8.1.1.1. The total music royalties collected for performance, sound recordings <strong>and</strong> mechanical rights over the lastthree years are reflected in Table 4.Table 4: Total Music Royalties Collected via Collecting SocietiesRefsSources of Music Royalty RevenueParagraph.Refs2010 Rm’s 2009 Rm’s 2008 Rm’sa. Radio stations 8.1.2 78,8 72,2 68,5b. Television stations 8.1.3 90,9 86,1 89,6c. Community TV <strong>and</strong> radio stations 8.1.4 3,0 2,8 2,6d. Foreign sources of income 8.1.5 8,1 7,9 7,3e. General (licensing) music users 8.1.6 121,9 96,3 79,4f. Mechanical rights 8.1.7 19,8 27,5 20,8g. Others 35,4 29,6 25,4h. TOTAL 357,9 322,4 293,6Growth 11% 10%8.1.1.2. The total collections for 2010 amounted to about R357,9 million compared to R322,5 million for 2009 <strong>and</strong>R293,7 million for 2008 (as per Table 4 (h)). Collections include performance, sound recording, <strong>and</strong>mechanical rights collected by the relevant collecting societies.8.1.1.3. The total collections of R357,9 million equates to 0,0128% of the total GDP, compared with 0,0417% forthe UK <strong>and</strong> 0,0468% for France. The growth of 11% <strong>and</strong> 10% over the last two years was largely due toincreases in sound recording royalties arising as result of growth in SAMPRA’s collections. SAMPRAcommenced with the collections of sound recording royalties in 2008.8.1.2 Radio stations8.1.2.1. Currently, both public <strong>and</strong> private radio stations pay for performance rights at an average rate of 3,25% (ongross advertising revenue) per annum. Due to the pending tariffs case against SAMPRA, no payment hasbeen made for sound recordings.- 54 -
8.1.2.2. Based on the CRC’s comparative exercise in respect of tariffs in both developed <strong>and</strong> developing countries,an average of 3,25% (currently paid by local radio stations) is extremely low as a total rate of music costfor an average music radio station. The CRC believes that a minimum rate of between 6,5% <strong>and</strong> 8%(performance rights plus sound recording rights) is appropriate for most radio stations in South Africa. Thisis based on the average of 8,06% for the countries selected for benchmarking determined in paragraph8.2.4.4. Based on this suggested minimum rate, there is a shortfall of approximately 3,25% (6,5% minus3,25%). Based on the shortfall of 3,25%, currently, the total annual leakage for radio stations is at leastR80 million per annum, which is largely due to non-payment for sound recordings by broadcasters <strong>and</strong> thefact that tariffs for performance rights are not competitive in relation to benchmarked countries.8.1.2.3. DMX Music is a background <strong>and</strong> foreground music service provider, providing pre-programmed music <strong>and</strong>genre-specific audio channels to subscribers.8.1.2.4. In December 1995, DMX Music concluded an Audio Service Distribution Agreement with pay televisionoperator Multichoice. Under the agreement, DMX Music supplies the service to Multichoice for use inresidential homes in the form of 40 programmed genre-specific audio channels, which are updated atperiods determined by Multichoice <strong>and</strong> DMX Music.8.1.2.5. For 16 years (as from 1995), no payment has been made by DMX for performance rights <strong>and</strong>, for the pasteight years, no payment has been made for sound recordings. Accordingly, DMX contravened the<strong>Copyright</strong> Act of 1978 by playing music publicly for 16 years without the appropriate licences.8.1.2.6. The CRC believes that it is inappropriate for Multichoice to provide a music broadcasting platform tobroadcasters who are not licensed to play music.8.1.3 Television Stations8.1.3.1. Public television relates to all stations that are owned by the SABC (including SABC1, SABC2 <strong>and</strong>SABC3).8.1.3.2. The total amount paid for performance rights with regard to public television for 2010 amounted toR51,5 million.8.1.3.3. Based on the benchmarking exercise performed against both developing <strong>and</strong> developed countries, thereare no material leakages in this area arising from these tariffs.8.1.3.4. The total amount paid by private TV stations in respect of performance rights for 2010 amounted toR39,4 million, <strong>and</strong> there are no material collecting leakages arising from the tariffs based on thebenchmarking exercise performed.8.1.4 Community Broadcasters8.1.4.1. There are about 150 community radio stations licensed by ICASA. Most have licences with SAMRO, butdo not honour their commitments of paying annual royalty fees. The majority are in arrears with payments.- 55 -
- Page 2 and 3:
TABLE OF CONTENTSLIST OF ABBREVIATI
- Page 4 and 5:
11.8 RECOMMENDATIONS ..............
- Page 6 and 7:
LIST OF TABLESTable 1: Cases of Non
- Page 8 and 9:
NORMOSPsPOSAPPLPPL (India)ProLitter
- Page 10 and 11: These problems are addressed in the
- Page 12 and 13: xxi.The report considers developmen
- Page 14 and 15: 1.3.8. Determine whether all money
- Page 16 and 17: 1.4.9. The CRC derived considerable
- Page 18 and 19: 2.3 SUBMISSION BY THE DEPARTMENT OF
- Page 20 and 21: Aspects of Intellectual Property Ri
- Page 22 and 23: (1) Subject to the provisions of th
- Page 24 and 25: Copyright Tribunal or an arbitrator
- Page 26 and 27: society, the South African Recordin
- Page 28 and 29: 3.2.14. With the liquidation of SAR
- Page 30 and 31: the final rate or rates to be appli
- Page 32 and 33: (a)that payment is to be made to th
- Page 34 and 35: information as to their use to enab
- Page 36 and 37: The WCT and WPPT oblige members to
- Page 38 and 39: Once the handset technology changed
- Page 40 and 41: 4.3.16. In 2009, in what was coined
- Page 42 and 43: 4.4.6. In exchange for the above li
- Page 44 and 45: operators are licensed by NORM to p
- Page 46 and 47: 5.2 FUNCTIONING OF COLLECTING SOCIE
- Page 48 and 49: the grant of licences. Article 17 o
- Page 50 and 51: 6.1.3. The CRC’s assessment of th
- Page 52 and 53: 6.3.3. SAMPRA should be given one y
- Page 54 and 55: Corporate Governance GapsKing II Re
- Page 56 and 57: King IIIPrincipleKing IIIRequiremen
- Page 58 and 59: King IIIPrincipleKing IIIRequiremen
- Page 62 and 63: 8.1.4.2. Needletime royalties are n
- Page 64 and 65: 8.1.7.4. For the past five years, V
- Page 66 and 67: PRS (UK)SPRE (FRANCE)SUISA(SWITZERL
- Page 68 and 69: DetailsPerformance RightsSound Reco
- Page 70 and 71: 8.2.7 Comparative Study Performed b
- Page 72 and 73: y a collecting society. A rights ho
- Page 74 and 75: agency, its rights being derived fr
- Page 76 and 77: Mr Robinson said DALRO assumed the
- Page 78 and 79: 10.1.6. The distribution to publish
- Page 80 and 81: 10.4.4. Most of the other collectin
- Page 82 and 83: 10.6.3.4. South African English-lis
- Page 84 and 85: 10.10 CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIPS BET
- Page 86 and 87: 10.12.2. The Regulations should rec
- Page 88 and 89: licence that the licensee comply wi
- Page 90 and 91: 11.4.6. The details of ICASA’s ta
- Page 92 and 93: RecommendationsTimelines for Recomm
- Page 94 and 95: enterprises. There was a suggestion
- Page 96 and 97: Copyright as it relates to copyrigh
- Page 98 and 99: 13.4 DEPARTMENT OF ARTS AND CULTURE
- Page 100 and 101: Table 28: Comparative Study’s Key
- Page 102 and 103: KEY ITEMS BRAZIL FRANCE INDIA NORWA
- Page 104 and 105: KEY ITEMS BRAZIL FRANCE INDIA NORWA
- Page 106 and 107: about 30%, which is the highest amo
- Page 108 and 109: 15.1.3. The Copyright Tribunal’s
- Page 110 and 111:
15.1.20. Local music content requir
- Page 112 and 113:
for the selected artists. The outco
- Page 114 and 115:
King III Report by Institute of Dir
- Page 116 and 117:
Paranagua Pedro, “Strategies to I
- Page 118 and 119:
Copyright Amendment Act of 1984Copy
- Page 120 and 121:
APPENDIX 1(B): SUMMARY OF ORAL REPR
- Page 122 and 123:
Due to the fact that the existing c
- Page 124 and 125:
Mr BrottelProtection of copyright m
- Page 126 and 127:
1.1.3. LIST OF ENTITIES VISITED AND
- Page 128 and 129:
In the 2009 Annual Report of ABRAMU
- Page 130 and 131:
The implementation of this law led
- Page 132 and 133:
ecordings. In respect of audio-visu
- Page 134 and 135:
In 1995, ECAD distributed 72% of it
- Page 136 and 137:
niches in the market to ensure fair
- Page 138 and 139:
Proprietary rights allow authors to
- Page 140 and 141:
International royalty distribution
- Page 142 and 143:
3.2. Relevant LegislationsThe prese
- Page 144 and 145:
IPRS uses the standard tariffs in r
- Page 146 and 147:
Ad-hoc workshops on copyright are c
- Page 148 and 149:
meaningful living out of their crea
- Page 150 and 151:
4.1.3. LICENSING AND LEGAL REGIMESI
- Page 152 and 153:
Ballet teachers; Teachers in the fi
- Page 154 and 155:
It was founded in 1928 by the Norwe
- Page 156 and 157:
6.2. STRUCTURE OF COLLECTING SOCIET
- Page 158 and 159:
6.5. COLLECTION OF MUSIC ROYALTIEST
- Page 160 and 161:
1957, when the Managing Director of
- Page 162 and 163:
16.4.14 SWISSPERFORM: CHF4 millionI
- Page 164 and 165:
Cross-border licensing of digital r
- Page 166 and 167:
algorithm could be used to determin
- Page 168 and 169:
Collecting societies in the UK all
- Page 170 and 171:
APPENDIX 3: RECOMMENDATIONS BY MITT
- Page 172 and 173:
1.PREAMBLEThe Music Industry Task T
- Page 174 and 175:
The environment in which the music
- Page 176 and 177:
3.1.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND ACCESSION
- Page 178 and 179:
In this regard, the Minister should
- Page 180 and 181:
3.5.6 OMBUDSMANThe music industry s
- Page 182 and 183:
RECOMMENDATION 23:The MITT recommen
- Page 184 and 185:
The MITT further recommends that DA
- Page 186 and 187:
APPENDIX 4A: EXTRACTS FROM COPYRIGH
- Page 188 and 189:
(f)(g)doing, in relation to an adap
- Page 190 and 191:
(i)requiring notice of any intended
- Page 192 and 193:
(b)any organization claiming to be
- Page 194 and 195:
PERFORMERS’ PROTECTION ACTNO. 11
- Page 196 and 197:
the parties may agree to refer the
- Page 198 and 199:
- 192 -
- Page 200 and 201:
- 194 -
- Page 202 and 203:
- 196 -
- Page 204 and 205:
- 198 -
- Page 206 and 207:
ANNEXURE 5: COPY OF SARRAL’S CONT
- Page 208 and 209:
- 202 -
- Page 210 and 211:
ANNEXURE 6: SARRAL’S AUDIT REPORT
- Page 212 and 213:
- 206 -
- Page 214 and 215:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 216 and 217:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 218 and 219:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 220 and 221:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 222 and 223:
TERMS OF REFERENCESNO’SREQUIREMEN
- Page 224:
- 218 -