12.07.2015 Views

Audit of Residential Facilities, Final report - Division for Social Policy ...

Audit of Residential Facilities, Final report - Division for Social Policy ...

Audit of Residential Facilities, Final report - Division for Social Policy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

This was recorded and submitted to the Project Manager on a regular basis.b. Data analysis: Once the data was captured from the questionnaires, the data wassent to a data management specialist who collated and analysed the data on aprovincial basis, using SPSS as the statistical programme. The provincial data wascombined to produce the data <strong>for</strong> the national <strong>report</strong>.c. ReportingAfter conducting the two day audit with each home, the fieldworker produced a <strong>report</strong>.This is a <strong>report</strong> in which the field worker collates the in<strong>for</strong>mation in the 5questionnaires (management and board, staff and volunteers, residents, family andcommunity members) to describe what was happening in the home. It drew a fewconclusions and makes some recommendations where this is necessary. The <strong>report</strong>swere checked by the Project management team, sent back to the fieldworkers <strong>for</strong>additional in<strong>for</strong>mation where necessary, and then produced as a final <strong>report</strong>. This wasdone <strong>for</strong> each home.Provincial <strong>report</strong>s were written based on the provincial data as well as an attempt todraw out some provincial trends, while the national data was used to draw out somenational trends.1.4 Limitations <strong>of</strong> the Studyi. There was a discrepancy across all groups with regard to the conditions in the homesuch as the availability <strong>of</strong> services, policies and procedures and overall managementand governance issues. Often Board and management indicated one answer and staffwould say something different. In some instances it was clear that this was as a result<strong>of</strong> a lack <strong>of</strong> communication between management and staff, in others, it related togrievances that staff had towards their conditions <strong>of</strong> employment (low salaries andbad working conditions). This made it difficult <strong>for</strong> the audit team to assess in a 2-dayvisit, with limited access to people, to know what the reality was. At times we wereable to verify in<strong>for</strong>mation through studying various documents but, <strong>of</strong>ten this did notgive a clear sense <strong>of</strong> what the actual practice was in a home.ii. It was also very clear in many instances that the homes were „prepared‟ <strong>for</strong> the audit,the place was cleaned, the residents were groomed and very <strong>of</strong>ten the different teamswere briefed in a particular way that they would all give the same responses, which19 | D S D A u d i t o f R e s i d e n t i a l F a c i l i t i e s

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!