12.07.2015 Views

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

Nation-Building and Contested Identities: Romanian & Hungarian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IRINA CULICthe protection of their interests <strong>and</strong> provision of particular rights. Yet,these interests are expressed <strong>and</strong> represented by the political <strong>and</strong> culturalelites of the <strong>Hungarian</strong> minority in Romania (Transylvania). Obviously,there is a homology between the politics pursued by Budapest <strong>and</strong> thedynamics of the <strong>Hungarian</strong> minority elite in Romania. Thus, the “civic”identity of the <strong>Hungarian</strong>s in Romania is substantially influenced by thepositions taken by the <strong>Romanian</strong> state in devising <strong>and</strong> implementing legislationwith respect to national minorities, local administration, <strong>and</strong>education; by the positions taken by the <strong>Hungarian</strong> state expressed inthe degree <strong>and</strong> form of responsibility assumed for the ethnonational kinabroad; <strong>and</strong> by the relations between the two states. The <strong>Hungarian</strong>s inRomania tend to be dissatisfied <strong>and</strong> frustrated by their membership inthe <strong>Romanian</strong> polity, as the data in Table 1 suggests.TABLE 1. Degrees of agreement with the following statement: “I would ratherbe a <strong>Romanian</strong> citizen than a citizen of any other country”.<strong>Romanian</strong>s<strong>Hungarian</strong>sFully agree 57.2% 21.5%Rather agree 19.8% 21.1%Rather disagree 14.1% 22.7%Fully disagree 5.6% 29.6%Don’t know 3.3% 5.1%TOTAL 100% 100%Source: Irina Culic, István Horváth <strong>and</strong> Marius Lazãr, Ethnobarometer: Interethnic Relationsin Romania (Cluj-Napoca: Research Center for Interethnic Relations – CCRIT,2000). R<strong>and</strong>om multi-cluster multi-stratified samples for the <strong>Romanian</strong> population,N=1253 <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Hungarian</strong> population, N=798. In the national weighted sample, the<strong>Hungarian</strong>s were 10 times over-represented, <strong>and</strong> the <strong>Romanian</strong>s from Szeklerl<strong>and</strong> were57 times over-represented. 22There are several reasons behind these responses. However, the<strong>Hungarian</strong>s’ institutional situation as a national minority in Romania isonly a minor reason. The <strong>Hungarian</strong>s in Romania currently enjoy mostcultural rights. 23 In Marshall’s terms of citizenship, 24 <strong>Hungarian</strong>s enjoythe same membership in the political community as <strong>Romanian</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> theireconomic situation is not different from that of the <strong>Romanian</strong>s. 25 Anyactual disadvantage arises as a result of contextual factors such as ethnicdistribution in a specific locality, but this holds true for <strong>Romanian</strong>s aswell. 26 There are more important reasons, in my opinion, that account forthe <strong>Hungarian</strong>s’ dissatisfaction with <strong>Romanian</strong> citizenship. The frustratingexperience of <strong>Hungarian</strong>s traveling abroad as <strong>Romanian</strong> citizens –identified, labeled <strong>and</strong> treated as “<strong>Romanian</strong>s” – is particularly illustra-232

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!