Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County
Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County
R1WR1ER1ER2E0403020106050403 0201060504030201TOLLESONSee DETAIL A091011120708# Cashion StationCowden StationFowler Station101112070809101109# # # # Fowler DepotJean Station# Campo Station1216211522Agua Fria River14231324181917201621152214231324181917201615141321 222324unmapped28 27262725 3026 2530292829282726253334353631323334Salt River3536 313233343536r Initial MonumentKEYPROJECT LOCATIONT1N-R1WT1N-R1ET1N-R2EGila and Salt River MeridianArizonaMaricopaCountyProject BoundarySalt River Project BoundarySteam Power Plant(Central Arizona Light and Power)County Poor FarmArizona Eastern Railroad(Southern Pacific Railroad)U.S. Highway 80PROJECT TITLE:DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANPROJECT NO. FCD 99-41CONSULTANT:St. John's CanalSalt River Valley CanalMeridian Canal(unmapped in R2E)Farmers' CanalGriffin Ditch0 2000 4000 6000 8000 FeetAZ State Plane Central NAD83NDETAIL AFIGURE V-3EXHIBIT TITLE:HISTORICAL FEATURES
per second) 4 . The Salt River Farming Ditch Company built a canaldownstream from the Griffin Ditch in 1872, and with a bottom width of25 feet, it was much larger than the earlier canal. At a cost ofapproximately $22,000, the ditch was planned to extend all the way westto the Agua Fria River (Zarbin 1997:35)By the spring of 1872, six ditches diverted water from the north bank ofthe Salt River within the project area. From east to west, the list includedthe Swilling Canal, the Wilson Canal, the Juan Chiviri/Griffin Ditch, theSalt River Valley Canal, the Monterey Canal, and the Mexican Canal. Inone observer’s opinion, farmers cultivated about 8,000 acres in thespring of 1872, about half in barley, one-third in wheat, and the rest invegetables, alfalfa, vineyards, and orchards (Zarbin 1997:35).The Arizona desert climate cycles between wet spells and dry years. Inthe first years of the 1870s, abundant floods washed out both canals andbrush diversion dams across the valley. By 1879, however, a dry yearbrought new concerns and accusations. The worried Salt River Valleyfarmers talked about building a unified irrigation system with a singlewatertight dam on bedrock to divert the Salt River water into theircanals. In 1881, Territorial Governor John C. Fremont urged theTerritorial Assembly to “seek federal aid to develop water-storageprojects that would enable vast wastelands to be occupied by settlers”(Waggoner 1970:174). The discussions eventually led to the formationof the Salt River Valley Water Users’ Association and the constructionof Roosevelt dam in the first decade of the new century.4 The term “miner’s inch” is a measurement of small amounts of flowing water, and the exactamount of water included in a miner’s inch is determined by individual state statute. In Arizona, a miner’s inchof is equal to 1 /40 cubic foot of water per second, or 11.22 gallons per minute.“Full of Push and Enterprise”Worries about insufficient river flows did not prevent new groups fromforming irrigation companies. In the early months of 1887, W. H. St.John and three other men dug a new ditch on the north bank of the SaltRiver. Intending to irrigate forty sections of land, they appropriated5,000 miner’s inches of water into the St. John Canal from a canal headat 83 rd Avenue. In 1892, the small canal company sold the seven-milelong St. John Canal to the Orange Belt Land and Canal Company(Zarbin 1997:109). The St. John Canal extended northwest from theSalt River almost to the Agua Fria River and persisted on maps into the1930s (Heard 1915;Maricopa County 189-; U.S. Reclamation Service1914; Salt River Project 1934).Also completed prior to 1891 was the Farmers Canal between the St.John Canal and the Griffin Ditch (Maricopa County 189-; Schultz &Franklin 1891). Although one source suggests that the Farmers Canalmay have been constructed as early as 1868, it is likely that this canalthrough the study area flowed only intermittently in the 1870s and1880s. As was typical of simple diversion dams, the brush dam in theSalt River in the general area of today’s 27 th Avenue and Lower BuckeyeRoad washed out frequently. When investors in the newly formedFarmers Irrigation Company inspected the Farmers Canal in the summerof 1890, they described it as in poor repair, with less than 5,000 acres offarmland contracted to receive water [out of a possible 24,000 acres thatmight have been served by the length of the canal]. In October 1890,crews worked to re-dig a 12-mile segment of the canal, but therevitalization of the Farmers Canal system was short-lived. Perhaps dueto damage caused by wide-spread flooding in 1891, the FarmersIrrigation Company dissolved within the decade amid a flurry of legaldocuments as the board members of the company sued each other(Rogge and others 1991:170-172).By the early 1890s, more than one hundred miles of canals had beenconstructed across the valley to irrigate more than 100,000 acres offarmland. Optimism for the future of the desert settlement ran high.Promoters such as Theodore Schultz and William Franklin, self-styled“immigration solicitors,” touted the agricultural potential of the Valleywith promotional literature including maps, brochures, and even poetry.The following verses were inscribed on Schultz and Franklin’s 1891 mapof the Salt River Valley,The branch here bends beneath the weight pear,And verdant olives flourish round the year;The balmy spirit of the western galeEternal breathes on fruits untaught to fail.The same mild season gives the blooms to blow,The buds to harden, and the fruits to grow(Schultz & Franklin 1891).In the same spirit of optimism, the publishers of the first city directorydescribed Phoenix as the most important commercial town in theTerritory, “thoroughly American, and its citizens are live and go-aheadpeople full of push and enterprise” (Bensel Directory Company 1892).Fields, Towns, and HomesDrought followed flood, and the drought years of the late 1890s againspurred discussions of a major storage dam on the Salt River. Tied withnational sentiment for reclamation, these discussions culminated in theformation of the Salt River Valley Waters Users Association in 1903, agroup that worked with the federal government under the 1902Newlands Act to begin construction of the Theodore Roosevelt Dam in1905. Completed in 1911, the masonry dam assured a water supply toDIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 50 DURANGO ADMPDATA COLLECTION REPORT
- Page 2 and 3: Durango Area Drainage Master PlanDa
- Page 4 and 5: Durango Area Drainage Master PlanDa
- Page 7 and 8: II. DATA COLLECTION RESULTSA. Exist
- Page 9 and 10: multiple use benefits to the commun
- Page 18 and 19: III. INITIAL HYDROLOGY REPORTA. Int
- Page 21 and 22: IV. LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS & MULTI-US
- Page 24 and 25: TransportationThe I-10 Papago Freew
- Page 26 and 27: Existing Landscape Character UnitsA
- Page 28 and 29: Residential P.A.D. UnitDescriptionT
- Page 30: Scenic QualityScenic quality of the
- Page 35: Future Desired Landscape CharacterA
- Page 39 and 40: R1WR1ER1ER2E040302#0106050403 02010
- Page 41 and 42: upstream, and downstream of the con
- Page 43 and 44: upper and lower Salt and Verde rive
- Page 45 and 46: introduced populations exist in Mar
- Page 47 and 48: B. Historical and Pre-Historical Th
- Page 50 and 51: Settlement Patterns and Site Develo
- Page 54 and 55: the Salt River valley and filled th
- Page 56 and 57: 1922 map, Buckeye Road is shown as
- Page 58 and 59: D. Social and Economic AssessmentTh
- Page 60 and 61: According to the U.S. Census Bureau
- Page 62 and 63: Table V-4. Block Groups With Signif
- Page 64 and 65: E. Hazardous Waste InventoryThe eff
- Page 66 and 67: System), PADS, RCRA-J (medical wast
- Page 68 and 69: #####R1W R1E R1E R2E0302010605##04#
- Page 70 and 71: VI. PLAN SET BIBLIOGRAPHYArizona De
- Page 72 and 73: VII. REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENC
- Page 74 and 75: 1993 The Promotion of Phoenix. In P
- Page 76 and 77: 1985-88 The 1982-1984 Excavations a
- Page 78 and 79: CURRENT AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTSDe
- Page 82 and 83: STORM COMPARISON TABLES
- Page 84 and 85: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 86 and 87: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 88 and 89: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 90 and 91: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 92 and 93: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 94 and 95: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 96 and 97: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 98 and 99: 100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
- Page 100 and 101: Storm ComparisonSTATIONSUBGAPEAKFLO
R1WR1ER1ER2E0403020106050403 0201060504030201TOLLESONSee DETAIL A091011120708# Cashion StationCowden StationFowler Station101112070809101109# # # # Fowler DepotJean Station# Campo Station1216211522Agua Fria River14231324181917201621152214231324181917201615141321 222324unmapped28 27262725 3026 2530292829282726253334353631323334Salt River3536 313233343536r Initial MonumentKEYPROJECT LOCATIONT1N-R1WT1N-R1ET1N-R2EGila and Salt River MeridianArizona<strong>Maricopa</strong><strong>County</strong>Project BoundarySalt River Project BoundarySteam Power Plant(Central Arizona Light and Power)<strong>County</strong> Poor FarmArizona Eastern Railroad(Southern Pacific Railroad)U.S. Highway 80PROJECT TITLE:DURANGO AREA DRAINAGE MASTER PLANPROJECT NO. FCD 99-41CONSULTANT:St. John's CanalSalt River Valley CanalMeridian Canal(unmapped in R2E)Farmers' CanalGriffin Ditch0 2000 4000 6000 8000 FeetAZ State Plane Central NAD83NDETAIL AFIGURE V-3EXHIBIT TITLE:HISTORICAL FEATURES