12.07.2015 Views

Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

V. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEWA. Ecological AssessmentIntroductionThe objectives <strong>of</strong> this ecological assessment are to identify, evaluate, andmap vegetation communities in the Durango drainage area, to determinewhether such vegetation communities may support special interestspecies, and to identify sensitive biological resources. A special interestspecies is any species <strong>of</strong> interest to any regulatory or managementagency <strong>of</strong> the federal, state or local government. The list <strong>of</strong> specialinterest species considered in this assessment was developed from listsprovided by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and the ArizonaGame and Fish Department (AGFD), included in the Appendix.A reconnaissance survey <strong>of</strong> vegetation communities in the project area,except for extremely disturbed, industrial, and urbanized portions, wasconducted between 20 and 23 December, 1999. The survey wasconducted from a vehicle along major roads in the project area, and onfoot in and adjacent to the Agua Fria, Gila, and Salt rivers. Thisecological assessment is general and does not include comprehensivelists <strong>of</strong> plant and animal species that may occur in or near, or be affectedby the proposed project.Historical Ecological ConditionsPrehistoric Hohokam inhabited and farmed central Arizona until the1400s. The Hohokam built an extensive network <strong>of</strong> hundreds <strong>of</strong> miles<strong>of</strong> canals to convey water from the Salt and Gila rivers and delivered itto fields up to 20 miles into the surrounding desert for crop irrigation.The canals measured up to 30 feet wide and 10 feet deep, and wereabandoned by the time Father Kino arrived in the late 1600s. Littlelarge-scale irrigation was built until Camp McDowell was establishednortheast <strong>of</strong> Phoenix in 1865.Soon after, the potential for reconstructing the Hohokam irrigationsystem was recognized and prompted the settlement <strong>of</strong> Phoenix (Rogge,Keane and McWatters 1994). Rainfall in the Sonoran Desert isunpredictable, and the reliable water source from reservoirs anddiversions attracted farmers and ranchers to the area. During the periodfrom 1867 to 1877, eleven or more irrigation canal companies operatedwhile some twenty-one new companies formed (Rogge et al. 1994).By 1885, the Arizona Diversion Dam was built on the Salt River, and theArizona Canal was under construction some 25 miles east <strong>of</strong> Phoenix -representing the first extension <strong>of</strong> the Hohokam canal network. TheArizona Diversion Dam was replaced with the Granite Reef Diversion,constructed from 1906 to 1908 in conjunction with the Roosevelt Dam.The Lake Pleasant Dam on the Agua Fria River was complete by 1920,and the reservoir was full by 1941. By 1950, 14 dams and diversionswere built upstream <strong>of</strong> the Durango drainage area on the Gila, AguaFria, Salt, and Verde rivers to reclaim the arid lands <strong>of</strong> Arizona (Roggeet al. 1994). Such a magnitude <strong>of</strong> water diversion reduces the naturalwater table and subsequently changes the composition <strong>of</strong> vegetation andanimal communities.Local channeling <strong>of</strong> the Gila, Salt, and Agua Fria rivers predominantlyfor agricultural purposes likely represents the first major fragmentation<strong>of</strong> the cottonwood-willow gallery forests along these floodplains.Construction <strong>of</strong> fences to contain livestock obstructed travel by nativewildlife, and diversion <strong>of</strong> water for mining, livestock, and crops impactednative fish populations (Minckley1991).Existing Ecological ConditionsVegetation CommunitiesApproximately ninety to ninety-five percent <strong>of</strong> the Durango drainagearea has been disturbed as a result <strong>of</strong> past and current activities relatedto industrial, urban, and agricultural development. The project areacontains three types <strong>of</strong> communities: highly disturbed, agriculture fields,and Sonoran Desert (Figure V-1). The highly disturbed areas in the eastportion <strong>of</strong> the project area have been industrially, commercially, orresidentially developed. Agricultural areas are fairly contiguousthroughout the central and west portions (Photo V-1), while relativelyundisturbed areas are chiefly in and adjacent to riverine floodplains(Photo V-2). Vegetation in highly disturbed areas, and areas adjacentto agricultural fields, is <strong>of</strong>ten dominated by invading species such asRussian thistle (Salsola kali) and desert broom (Baccharis sarothroides).Urban and industrial areas have relatively little biological resource valuefor species other than pigeons (Columba livia), pests, and vermin, whileagricultural areas provide more resources for rodents, granivorous birds,and raptors.DIBBLE & ASSOCIATES 35 DURANGO ADMPDATA COLLECTION REPORT

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!