Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Durango Area Drainage Master PlanData Collection ReportFCD #99-41Prepared for:Flood Control District of Maricopa CountyPrepared by:In Cooperation With:McCloskey ! Peltz, Inc.L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T SandMarch 2000
Durango Area Drainage Master PlanData Collection ReportTable of ContentsList of FiguresList of TablesI. INTRODUCTION ................................. 1A. Purpose .................................... 1B. Scope of Project ............................. 1C. Study Area ................................. 2II. DATA COLLECTION RESULTS .................... 4A. Existing and Planned Drainage Facilities ........ 4B. Areas of Flooding ............................ 4C. Existing Studies ............................. 5D. Planned Developments ........................ 5E. Existing and Planned Major Utilities ............ 5F. Agency Contacts ............................. 5G. Survey and Mapping ......................... 7III. INITIAL HYDROLOGY REPORT ................. 15A. Introduction ............................... 15B. Hydrology Model Update .................... 15C. Modeling Results, Discrepancies, & Concerns ... 15IV. LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS & MULTI-USEOPPORTUNITIES ............................... 18A. Introduction ............................... 18B. Purpose ................................... 18C. Methodology ............................... 18D. Data Collection and Existing Conditions Analysis.......................................... 19E. Visual Resources Assessment ................. 22F. Multi-Use Opportunities Assessment ........... 32V. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW .................. 35A. Ecological Assessment ....................... 35B. Historical and Pre-Historical Themes Evaluation.......................................... 44C. Archaeological Assessment ................... 48D. Social and Economic Assessment .............. 55E. Hazardous Waste Inventory .................. 61VI. PLAN SET BIBLIOGRAPHY ...................... 67VII. REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENCES ....... 69Figure I-1. Study Location ................................ 1Figure I-2. Jurisdictional Boundaries ....................... 3Figure II-1. Existing FEMA Floodplains .................... 8Figure II-2. Planned Developments (1 of 2) .................. 9Figure II-3. Planned Developments (2 of 2) ................. 10Figure II-4. Existing and Planned Utilities (1 of 2) ........... 11Figure II-5. Existing and Planned Utilities (2 of 2) ........... 12Figure II-6. Existing Drainage Facilities .................... 13Figure II-7. Irrigation Map .............................. 14Figure III-1. Existing Land Use ........................... 17Figure IV-1. Regional Context Map ....................... 20Figure IV-2. Existing Landscape Character ................ 28Figure IV-3. Scenic Quality .............................. 29Figure IV-4. Visual Resource Inventory .................... 31Figure IV-5. Future Desired Landscape Character ........... 33Figure IV-6. Multiple Use Opportunities ................... 34Figure V-1. Vegetation Communities ...................... 36Figure V-2. Prehistoric Archaeological Sites ................ 46Figure V-3. Historical Features ........................... 49Figure V-4. Block Group Numbers / Significant Block Groups . 58Figure V-5. Hazardous Materials Sites (1 of 2) .............. 65Figure V-6. Hazardous Materials Sites (2 of 2) .............. 66Table V-1. Project Area Population And Land Area ......... 56Table V-2. Median Household Income And Ethnic Diversity .. 56Table V-3. Block Groups Significant For Low Median HouseholdIncome .......................................... 57Table V-4. Block Groups With Significant* Percentage of EthnicMinorities ....................................... 59Table V-5. Significant Block Groups, Significant Proportion ofMinors And Elderly* .............................. 60Table V-6. Summary Results Of Hazardous Materials DatabaseSearch .......................................... 64List of AppendicesDeveloper Contact InformationHydrology Exhibits 1 and 2Storm Comparison TableResponse Letters from Arizona Game & Fish Dept. and U.S. Fish &Wildlife ServiceWildlife Observed in the Durango Drainage Area
Page 4 and 5: Durango Area Drainage Master PlanDa
Page 7 and 8: II. DATA COLLECTION RESULTSA. Exist
Page 9 and 10: multiple use benefits to the commun
Page 18 and 19: III. INITIAL HYDROLOGY REPORTA. Int
Page 21 and 22: IV. LANDSCAPE AESTHETICS & MULTI-US
Page 24 and 25: TransportationThe I-10 Papago Freew
Page 26 and 27: Existing Landscape Character UnitsA
Page 28 and 29: Residential P.A.D. UnitDescriptionT
Page 30: Scenic QualityScenic quality of the
Page 35: Future Desired Landscape CharacterA
Page 39 and 40: R1WR1ER1ER2E040302#0106050403 02010
Page 41 and 42: upstream, and downstream of the con
Page 43 and 44: upper and lower Salt and Verde rive
Page 45 and 46: introduced populations exist in Mar
Page 47 and 48: B. Historical and Pre-Historical Th
Page 50 and 51: Settlement Patterns and Site Develo
Page 52 and 53:
R1WR1ER1ER2E0403020106050403 020106
Page 54 and 55:
the Salt River valley and filled th
Page 56 and 57:
1922 map, Buckeye Road is shown as
Page 58 and 59:
D. Social and Economic AssessmentTh
Page 60 and 61:
According to the U.S. Census Bureau
Page 62 and 63:
Table V-4. Block Groups With Signif
Page 64 and 65:
E. Hazardous Waste InventoryThe eff
Page 66 and 67:
System), PADS, RCRA-J (medical wast
Page 68 and 69:
#####R1W R1E R1E R2E0302010605##04#
Page 70 and 71:
VI. PLAN SET BIBLIOGRAPHYArizona De
Page 72 and 73:
VII. REPORT BIBLIOGRAPHY & REFERENC
Page 74 and 75:
1993 The Promotion of Phoenix. In P
Page 76 and 77:
1985-88 The 1982-1984 Excavations a
Page 78 and 79:
CURRENT AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTSDe
Page 82 and 83:
STORM COMPARISON TABLES
Page 84 and 85:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 86 and 87:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 88 and 89:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 90 and 91:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 92 and 93:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 94 and 95:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 96 and 97:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 98 and 99:
100-24100-610-2410-6i=3.99"i=3.23"i
Page 100 and 101:
Storm ComparisonSTATIONSUBGAPEAKFLO
Page 107:
WILDLIFE OBSERVED IN THE DURANGO DR
show all

Data Collection Report - Flood Control District of Maricopa County

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?