Part 1 - AL-Tax
Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax
Chapter 12AbstractTransitional economies are unable to rely on the innovation of taxation taken for grantedin developed economies. One such innovation is the expectation of tax compliance. Theethics of tax evasion has been discussed sporadically in the theological and philosophicalliterature for at least 500 years. Martin Crowe wrote a doctoral thesis that reviewed muchof that literature in 1944. This chapter begins with a review of such literature and identifiesthe main issues and summarizes the three main viewpoints that have emerged overthe centuries. It then reports on the results of a survey of Ukrainian law students who wereasked their opinions on the ethics of tax evasion. The survey consisted of 18 statements,representing the 15 issues and three viewpoints that have emerged over the centuries, plusthree statements representing more recent issues. Participants were asked to signify theextent of their agreement with each statement by placing a number from 0 to 6 in the spaceprovided. The data were then analyzed to determine which of the three viewpoints wasdominant among the sample population. The tax regime in Ukraine has much in commonwith the tax regimes in other transition economies. Thus, the lessons learned from thisstudy have application to other transition economies.12.1 IntroductionMost studies of tax evasion take an economic or public finance perspective. Notmuch has been written from a philosophical or ethical viewpoint. That is probablybecause most economists are utilitarians and most lawyers are legalists. However,there is a small body of literature that addresses tax evasion issues from a philosophicalor theological perspective. The present study is intended to summarizethat small body of literature while forming a bridge to the public finance literatureas well. The authors developed a survey instrument that included 18 statementsincorporating the three major views on the ethics of tax evasion that have emergedin the literature over the last 500 years. The survey was distributed to a group of lawstudents in Odessa, Ukraine. This chapter reports on the results and the statisticalvalidity of that survey.12.2 Review of the literatureA review of the literature on the ethics of tax evasion reveals that three majorviews have evolved over the last 500 years. One view takes the position that taxevasion is always or almost always unethical, either because there is a duty to Godto pay taxes, or there is a duty to some community or to society. Another view is293
International Taxation Handbookthat there is never or almost never a duty to pay taxes because the government isa thief, nothing more than a band of organized criminals, and there is no duty togive anything to criminals. The third view is that there is some ethical obligationto support the government of the country where you live but that duty is less thanabsolute.One of the most comprehensive analyses of the ethics of tax evasion was doneby Martin Crowe (1944), who examined the theological and philosophical literatureof the last 500 years. Much of this literature took the always unethical or sometimesunethical positions. McGee (1994) discussed and summarized the Crowe study.A more recent work by McGee (1998a) included the opinions of more than 20scholars who, collectively, espouse all three viewpoints. The Torgler (2003) studyis also comprehensive, although Torgler looked at both ethical and public financeaspects of the issue.A number of studies have been done that examine tax evasion in a particularcountry. Vaguine (1998) examined Russia, as did Preobragenskaya and McGee(2004) to a lesser extent. Smatrakalev (1998) discussed the ethics of tax evasion inBulgaria. Ballas and Tsoukas (1998) discussed the views of Greek taxpayers. McGee(1999e) conducted a series of interviews to determine how people in Armeniathink about tax evasion. McGee and Maranjyan (2006) did a follow-up empiricalstudy to determine the views of economics and theology students on the ethics oftax evasion. Surveys have also been conducted of Chinese business and economicsstudents (McGee and Yuhua, 2006), Chinese law, business and philosophy students(McGee and Guo, 2006), and accounting, business and economics students in HongKong (McGee and Ho, 2006), as well as international business professors (McGee,2005a), Romanian business students (McGee, 2005b), and Guatemalan businessand law students (McGee and Lingle, 2005). Morales (1998) discussed the viewpointof Mexican workers. Most of these studies found that taxpayers do not have anethical problem with evading taxes because their governments are corrupt and theyfeel that they have no ethical duty to pay taxes to a corrupt government. Moralesconcluded that a Mexican worker’s duty to his family is sometimes more importantthan his duty to the state.A number of studies have discussed the ethics of tax evasion from a practitionerperspective. Such studies tend to focus on the accounting profession’s ethicalcode rather than any philosophical concepts. Two studies that take a practitioner’sperspective were those of Armstrong and Robison (1998) and Oliva (1998).If the articles by Cohn (1998) and Tamari (1998) are representative of the Jewishview, one may say that the Jewish view is near absolutist. Because Cohn is anOrthodox rabbi and Tamari is a well-known and highly respected Jewish scholar,294
- Page 263 and 264: International Taxation Handbookdeta
- Page 265 and 266: International Taxation HandbookTo a
- Page 267 and 268: Table 10.1Theoretical studies on ta
- Page 269 and 270: International Taxation Handbookand
- Page 271 and 272: International Taxation Handbookwith
- Page 273 and 274: 252Table 10.2Historical background
- Page 275 and 276: International Taxation Handbooktax.
- Page 277 and 278: International Taxation HandbookTabl
- Page 279 and 280: 258Table 10.4 External deposits of
- Page 281 and 282: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 283 and 284: International Taxation HandbookIn c
- Page 285 and 286: International Taxation Handbookbe l
- Page 287 and 288: International Taxation HandbookUNCT
- Page 289 and 290: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 291 and 292: International Taxation Handbook11.2
- Page 293 and 294: 272Table 11.1(Continued)Rank Countr
- Page 295 and 296: International Taxation Handbook11.3
- Page 297 and 298: International Taxation Handbookleve
- Page 299 and 300: International Taxation Handbookalso
- Page 301 and 302: International Taxation Handbook11.5
- Page 303 and 304: International Taxation Handbook11.6
- Page 305 and 306: International Taxation HandbookFisc
- Page 307 and 308: International Taxation HandbookTabl
- Page 309 and 310: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 311 and 312: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 313: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 317 and 318: International Taxation Handbookmigh
- Page 319 and 320: International Taxation Handbookthe
- Page 321 and 322: International Taxation Handbook654S
- Page 323 and 324: International Taxation Handbook654S
- Page 325 and 326: 304Table 12.6Comparison of male and
- Page 327 and 328: International Taxation Handbookethi
- Page 329 and 330: International Taxation HandbookKant
- Page 331 and 332: International Taxation HandbookOliv
- Page 333 and 334: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 335 and 336: International Taxation HandbookHot
- Page 337 and 338: International Taxation Handbookbody
- Page 339 and 340: International Taxation Handbook●
- Page 341 and 342: International Taxation Handbookwill
- Page 343 and 344: International Taxation HandbookMone
- Page 345 and 346: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 347 and 348: International Taxation Handbookrela
- Page 349 and 350: International Taxation Handbookand
- Page 351 and 352: International Taxation Handbookusin
- Page 353 and 354: International Taxation Handbookadop
- Page 355 and 356: International Taxation HandbookFina
- Page 357 and 358: International Taxation Handbookvalu
- Page 359 and 360: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 361 and 362: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 363 and 364: International Taxation Handbookeval
Chapter 12AbstractTransitional economies are unable to rely on the innovation of taxation taken for grantedin developed economies. One such innovation is the expectation of tax compliance. Theethics of tax evasion has been discussed sporadically in the theological and philosophicalliterature for at least 500 years. Martin Crowe wrote a doctoral thesis that reviewed muchof that literature in 1944. This chapter begins with a review of such literature and identifiesthe main issues and summarizes the three main viewpoints that have emerged overthe centuries. It then reports on the results of a survey of Ukrainian law students who wereasked their opinions on the ethics of tax evasion. The survey consisted of 18 statements,representing the 15 issues and three viewpoints that have emerged over the centuries, plusthree statements representing more recent issues. <strong>Part</strong>icipants were asked to signify theextent of their agreement with each statement by placing a number from 0 to 6 in the spaceprovided. The data were then analyzed to determine which of the three viewpoints wasdominant among the sample population. The tax regime in Ukraine has much in commonwith the tax regimes in other transition economies. Thus, the lessons learned from thisstudy have application to other transition economies.12.1 IntroductionMost studies of tax evasion take an economic or public finance perspective. Notmuch has been written from a philosophical or ethical viewpoint. That is probablybecause most economists are utilitarians and most lawyers are legalists. However,there is a small body of literature that addresses tax evasion issues from a philosophicalor theological perspective. The present study is intended to summarizethat small body of literature while forming a bridge to the public finance literatureas well. The authors developed a survey instrument that included 18 statementsincorporating the three major views on the ethics of tax evasion that have emergedin the literature over the last 500 years. The survey was distributed to a group of lawstudents in Odessa, Ukraine. This chapter reports on the results and the statisticalvalidity of that survey.12.2 Review of the literatureA review of the literature on the ethics of tax evasion reveals that three majorviews have evolved over the last 500 years. One view takes the position that taxevasion is always or almost always unethical, either because there is a duty to Godto pay taxes, or there is a duty to some community or to society. Another view is293