Part 1 - AL-Tax
Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax
Chapter 10of either providing tax information or applying a nonresident withholding tax ata minimum rate of 20%. Member States opting for a withholding tax were to retainall revenue from taxing nonresident savings income. The distributional effects ofthe directive were a sticking point in the negotiations between the EuropeanCommission and its Member States. The UK and its AD territories would lose,whereas France and Germany would gain.The Feira agreement of June 2000 modified the 1998 proposal by requiringMember States (except for the three bank secrecy jurisdictions) to automaticallyexchange tax information. The three bank secrecy jurisdictions would be allowedto operate a withholding tax regime during a seven-year transition period. A withholdingtax rate of 15% would apply during the first three years and a rate of 20%during the remaining four years. In July 2001, the European Commission issueda revised proposed directive, which formed the basis of a political agreement inJanuary 2003.10.4.2 General principlesIn January 2003, the EU Council reached political agreement on a proposed savingstax directive, the final text of which was determined in June 2003. The savings taxwas supposed to take effect in January 2005. After half a year delay, on 1 July 2005,two taxation regimes became effective. The first regime consists of 22 EU MemberStates (The 12 old Member States that have committed to information sharing and10 new EU Member States that joined in May 2004) that exchange tax informationautomatically – that is, without the need for any specific request from the residencecountry – to all other Member States about the cross-border interest payments toindividuals within the European Union. Interest for that purpose means interestincome from debt claims of every kind, such as savings deposits, corporate andgovernment bonds, other negotiable debt securities, and income from investmentfunds (as long as the portfolio share of bonds exceeds 40%). The information 14 iscollected from interest-paying financial institutions, typically commercial banks,and passed to the domestic fiscal authority. The latter in turn transmits it to the foreignfiscal authorities (at least once a year), which allows the residence country tocharge the domestic tax on the foreign savings income of its residents, giving, ifapplicable, a credit for nonresident withholding tax paid abroad. Under the EU savingstax, information is thus collected on interest income (a flow), so that the directivedoes not touch upon the individual’s savings position (a stock).In the second taxation regime, the three EU countries with a bank secrecy tradition(Austria, Belgium, and Luxembourg) apply a nonresident withholding253
International Taxation Handbooktax. 15 They levy tax according to a graduated rate schedule: A rate of 15% duringthe first three years (July 2005–June 2008), 20% for the subsequent three years(July 2008–June 2011), and 35% from July 2011 onwards. The 35% tax rate correspondsto the current Swiss withholding tax on interest and dividends, which, contraryto that of most EU countries, applies to both residents and nonresidents equally.The first innovative feature of the EU savings tax involves the coverage of non-EU countries and DA territories of EU countries. To mitigate capital flight fromthe European Union, five non-EU jurisdictions – that is, Andorra, Liechtenstein,Monaco, San Marino, and Switzerland – have implemented ‘equivalent measures’,which implies that they apply a withholding tax under the same arrangementsas the three EU countries in the transition regime (this tax is also referredto as the ‘retention tax’, which is just another name for the withholding tax). Timeand again, the European Commission has talked with the USA in its third-countrynegotiations. The USA, however, has not accepted the savings tax directive and,consequently, neither provides information automatically to EU countries nor doesit impose a withholding tax on EU capital income. However, the Internal RevenueService (IRS) of the USA does receive information on US citizens’ and its alienresidents’ interest on bank accounts through its network of qualified intermediaries(QIs) abroad. 16 This information-gathering role of QIs reduced the pressureon the USA to participate in the EU savings tax.Three further characteristics of the withholding regime are noteworthy. First,withholding taxes are, in theory, not imposed on EU residents that have opted todisclose information on their savings income to their home tax authorities. Inpractice, the effective availability of this choice depends on whether the foreignfinancial institutions are willing to incur the additional administrative costs.Second, in cases of tax fraud, 17 the five non-EU countries will provide informationupon request of the EU tax authorities. Finally, the transitional regime endswhen the five third countries and the USA agree to exchange information onrequest in civil tax matters, and/or the three EU countries with a bank secrecy traditionelect to switch to automatic information sharing.The European Commission has negotiated ‘similar measures’ with DA territoriesof the Netherlands and the UK (10 in total) (Table 10.3), which are obvioustargets for tax evaders given their EU dependency. Four jurisdictions exchangeinformation automatically, whereas the remaining six levy a nonresident withholdingtax along the lines of Austria, Belgium, and Luxembourg. Seven DA territorieshave entered into a reciprocal agreement in which they receive from EUcountries tax information or, if applicable, receive withholding tax revenues oninterest income of their residents that have invested in participating EU countries254
- Page 223 and 224: International Taxation HandbookRefe
- Page 225 and 226: International Taxation HandbookEuro
- Page 227 and 228: International Taxation HandbookKind
- Page 229 and 230: International Taxation HandbookWils
- Page 231 and 232: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 233 and 234: International Taxation Handbooktop-
- Page 235 and 236: International Taxation Handbookkept
- Page 237 and 238: International Taxation Handbookexem
- Page 239 and 240: International Taxation Handbookin t
- Page 241 and 242: International Taxation HandbookOnce
- Page 243 and 244: International Taxation Handbookpaid
- Page 245 and 246: International Taxation HandbookFull
- Page 247 and 248: 226Table 9.3(Continued)Classical sy
- Page 249 and 250: International Taxation HandbookWith
- Page 251 and 252: 230Table 9.4(Continued)Arm’s leng
- Page 253 and 254: International Taxation Handbookgrou
- Page 255 and 256: International Taxation HandbookIn t
- Page 257 and 258: International Taxation Handbookrest
- Page 259 and 260: International Taxation HandbookMatt
- Page 261 and 262: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 263 and 264: International Taxation Handbookdeta
- Page 265 and 266: International Taxation HandbookTo a
- Page 267 and 268: Table 10.1Theoretical studies on ta
- Page 269 and 270: International Taxation Handbookand
- Page 271 and 272: International Taxation Handbookwith
- Page 273: 252Table 10.2Historical background
- Page 277 and 278: International Taxation HandbookTabl
- Page 279 and 280: 258Table 10.4 External deposits of
- Page 281 and 282: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 283 and 284: International Taxation HandbookIn c
- Page 285 and 286: International Taxation Handbookbe l
- Page 287 and 288: International Taxation HandbookUNCT
- Page 289 and 290: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 291 and 292: International Taxation Handbook11.2
- Page 293 and 294: 272Table 11.1(Continued)Rank Countr
- Page 295 and 296: International Taxation Handbook11.3
- Page 297 and 298: International Taxation Handbookleve
- Page 299 and 300: International Taxation Handbookalso
- Page 301 and 302: International Taxation Handbook11.5
- Page 303 and 304: International Taxation Handbook11.6
- Page 305 and 306: International Taxation HandbookFisc
- Page 307 and 308: International Taxation HandbookTabl
- Page 309 and 310: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 311 and 312: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 313 and 314: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 315 and 316: International Taxation Handbookthat
- Page 317 and 318: International Taxation Handbookmigh
- Page 319 and 320: International Taxation Handbookthe
- Page 321 and 322: International Taxation Handbook654S
- Page 323 and 324: International Taxation Handbook654S
Chapter 10of either providing tax information or applying a nonresident withholding tax ata minimum rate of 20%. Member States opting for a withholding tax were to retainall revenue from taxing nonresident savings income. The distributional effects ofthe directive were a sticking point in the negotiations between the EuropeanCommission and its Member States. The UK and its AD territories would lose,whereas France and Germany would gain.The Feira agreement of June 2000 modified the 1998 proposal by requiringMember States (except for the three bank secrecy jurisdictions) to automaticallyexchange tax information. The three bank secrecy jurisdictions would be allowedto operate a withholding tax regime during a seven-year transition period. A withholdingtax rate of 15% would apply during the first three years and a rate of 20%during the remaining four years. In July 2001, the European Commission issueda revised proposed directive, which formed the basis of a political agreement inJanuary 2003.10.4.2 General principlesIn January 2003, the EU Council reached political agreement on a proposed savingstax directive, the final text of which was determined in June 2003. The savings taxwas supposed to take effect in January 2005. After half a year delay, on 1 July 2005,two taxation regimes became effective. The first regime consists of 22 EU MemberStates (The 12 old Member States that have committed to information sharing and10 new EU Member States that joined in May 2004) that exchange tax informationautomatically – that is, without the need for any specific request from the residencecountry – to all other Member States about the cross-border interest payments toindividuals within the European Union. Interest for that purpose means interestincome from debt claims of every kind, such as savings deposits, corporate andgovernment bonds, other negotiable debt securities, and income from investmentfunds (as long as the portfolio share of bonds exceeds 40%). The information 14 iscollected from interest-paying financial institutions, typically commercial banks,and passed to the domestic fiscal authority. The latter in turn transmits it to the foreignfiscal authorities (at least once a year), which allows the residence country tocharge the domestic tax on the foreign savings income of its residents, giving, ifapplicable, a credit for nonresident withholding tax paid abroad. Under the EU savingstax, information is thus collected on interest income (a flow), so that the directivedoes not touch upon the individual’s savings position (a stock).In the second taxation regime, the three EU countries with a bank secrecy tradition(Austria, Belgium, and Luxembourg) apply a nonresident withholding253