Part 1 - AL-Tax
Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax
Chapter 9literature dealing with comparative taxation, see, for instance, Thuronyi, 2000,2003; Ault and Arnold, 2004). At this level there is a selection of partially differentand alternative policy choices by EU countries aimed at solving commonproblems concerning the treatment of corporate income. Therefore, while at thefirst level (common core) we can identify a single common EU tax family, at leastfor the EU-15 countries, at the second level different EU corporate tax modelsemerge. The main EU corporate tax models can be referred to the basic corporatetax problems listed at the beginning of this section. 9In relation to the tax treatment of corporate distributions, these models are:1. The classical system, which can be divided into two sub-models: Theunmodified classical system (which does not provide relief for personalincome tax on dividends) and the modified classical system, or shareholderrelief (which provides shareholder relief of various kinds for personalincome tax on dividends unconnected with corporate income taxpaid on distributions).2. The imputation system, which can also be divided into two sub-models:The partial imputation system (according to which partial credit is givenfor a shareholder’s personal income tax liability in respect to corporateincome tax paid on distributed dividends) and the full imputation system(according to which full credit is given for a shareholder’s personal incometax liability in respect to corporate income tax paid on dividends).3. Reduced taxation of distributed profits. 104. Participation exemption, which provides zero or reduced taxation on dividendsand/or gains from sales of qualified participations.In relation to the limitation to the deduction on interest, the EU tax models are:1. The fixed debt/equity ratio (or tax treatment of thin capitalization), whichentails that if the debt/equity ratio exceeds a given threshold, the exceedinginterest remuneration is deemed as constructive dividends. In thiscase, the debtor cannot deduct interest paid on loans granted by qualifiedshareholders and/or related parties.2. The recharacterization of interest as nondeductible expenses, according towhich interest is recharacterized as nondeductible expenses in so far asthe underlying financial source meets crucial requirements of equityrather than of debt.3. The ‘arm’s length’ approach, which entails the nondeductibility of interestpaid between affiliated companies which is in excess of what would be221
International Taxation Handbookpaid between unconnected parties dealing at arm’s length, on terms thatwould have been agreed between unconnected parties.4. The assets dilution ratio, according to which certain expenses related toacquisition of participations generating nontaxable income (capital gainsor dividend) are not deductible for the acquiring company, either by wayof a ratio between taxable and nontaxable income or by a ratio betweenfinancial and nonfinancial assets.In relation to tax treatment of corporate reorganizations, the tax models emergingat the EU level basically are:1. Transactions in which either assets or participations are sold.2. Reorganizations of entities.For transactions of assets, we can identify three different sub-models: Full taxationof gains/losses, and the rollover relief at a financial value model or at taxvalue. With reference to transactions on participations, in addition to these submodels,there is also the participation exemption sub-model, in which gains areexempt and losses are not deductible. In reorganizations of entities, it is possibleto identify two basic sub-models: the Taxation model and the rollover relief (neutrality)model. EU countries that follow a taxation model recognize taxable capitalgains and deductible capital losses resulting from cross-border (or internal)corporate reorganizations, while those countries that follow a neutrality modeldo not recognize taxable capital gains and deductible capital losses resultingfrom reorganization.Finally, in relation to consolidated corporate taxation, the tax models emergingat EU level are:1. Domestic tax consolidation (or fiscal unity), according to which a group ofcompanies that are resident in the same EU country is regarded for taxpurposes as a single taxpayer, so that the profits and losses of the participatingcompanies can be offset against each other.2. Trans-border tax consolidation, which entails that the profits and losses ofa group of companies resident or not resident in the same EU country canbe offset against each other.3. Group contribution, according to which each company belonging to a groupcontinues to file its own tax return and to pay its own taxes, but is allowedto make a contribution to a company with losses. Such a contribution isdeductible for tax purposes in the hands of the former company and taxablein the hands of the latter company, so that profits and losses can be offset. 11222
- Page 191 and 192: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 193 and 194: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 195 and 196: International Taxation HandbookEuro
- Page 197 and 198: International Taxation Handbookhand
- Page 199 and 200: International Taxation Handbook●
- Page 201 and 202: International Taxation Handbook2523
- Page 203 and 204: International Taxation HandbookWild
- Page 205 and 206: International Taxation Handbook8.5.
- Page 207 and 208: International Taxation Handbook43.5
- Page 209 and 210: International Taxation Handbookof a
- Page 211 and 212: International Taxation Handbookbe c
- Page 213 and 214: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 215 and 216: International Taxation Handbookther
- Page 217 and 218: International Taxation Handbookof t
- Page 219 and 220: International Taxation Handbookfor
- Page 221 and 222: International Taxation HandbookNote
- Page 223 and 224: International Taxation HandbookRefe
- Page 225 and 226: International Taxation HandbookEuro
- Page 227 and 228: International Taxation HandbookKind
- Page 229 and 230: International Taxation HandbookWils
- Page 231 and 232: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 233 and 234: International Taxation Handbooktop-
- Page 235 and 236: International Taxation Handbookkept
- Page 237 and 238: International Taxation Handbookexem
- Page 239 and 240: International Taxation Handbookin t
- Page 241: International Taxation HandbookOnce
- Page 245 and 246: International Taxation HandbookFull
- Page 247 and 248: 226Table 9.3(Continued)Classical sy
- Page 249 and 250: International Taxation HandbookWith
- Page 251 and 252: 230Table 9.4(Continued)Arm’s leng
- Page 253 and 254: International Taxation Handbookgrou
- Page 255 and 256: International Taxation HandbookIn t
- Page 257 and 258: International Taxation Handbookrest
- Page 259 and 260: International Taxation HandbookMatt
- Page 261 and 262: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 263 and 264: International Taxation Handbookdeta
- Page 265 and 266: International Taxation HandbookTo a
- Page 267 and 268: Table 10.1Theoretical studies on ta
- Page 269 and 270: International Taxation Handbookand
- Page 271 and 272: International Taxation Handbookwith
- Page 273 and 274: 252Table 10.2Historical background
- Page 275 and 276: International Taxation Handbooktax.
- Page 277 and 278: International Taxation HandbookTabl
- Page 279 and 280: 258Table 10.4 External deposits of
- Page 281 and 282: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 283 and 284: International Taxation HandbookIn c
- Page 285 and 286: International Taxation Handbookbe l
- Page 287 and 288: International Taxation HandbookUNCT
- Page 289 and 290: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 291 and 292: International Taxation Handbook11.2
Chapter 9literature dealing with comparative taxation, see, for instance, Thuronyi, 2000,2003; Ault and Arnold, 2004). At this level there is a selection of partially differentand alternative policy choices by EU countries aimed at solving commonproblems concerning the treatment of corporate income. Therefore, while at thefirst level (common core) we can identify a single common EU tax family, at leastfor the EU-15 countries, at the second level different EU corporate tax modelsemerge. The main EU corporate tax models can be referred to the basic corporatetax problems listed at the beginning of this section. 9In relation to the tax treatment of corporate distributions, these models are:1. The classical system, which can be divided into two sub-models: Theunmodified classical system (which does not provide relief for personalincome tax on dividends) and the modified classical system, or shareholderrelief (which provides shareholder relief of various kinds for personalincome tax on dividends unconnected with corporate income taxpaid on distributions).2. The imputation system, which can also be divided into two sub-models:The partial imputation system (according to which partial credit is givenfor a shareholder’s personal income tax liability in respect to corporateincome tax paid on distributed dividends) and the full imputation system(according to which full credit is given for a shareholder’s personal incometax liability in respect to corporate income tax paid on dividends).3. Reduced taxation of distributed profits. 104. <strong>Part</strong>icipation exemption, which provides zero or reduced taxation on dividendsand/or gains from sales of qualified participations.In relation to the limitation to the deduction on interest, the EU tax models are:1. The fixed debt/equity ratio (or tax treatment of thin capitalization), whichentails that if the debt/equity ratio exceeds a given threshold, the exceedinginterest remuneration is deemed as constructive dividends. In thiscase, the debtor cannot deduct interest paid on loans granted by qualifiedshareholders and/or related parties.2. The recharacterization of interest as nondeductible expenses, according towhich interest is recharacterized as nondeductible expenses in so far asthe underlying financial source meets crucial requirements of equityrather than of debt.3. The ‘arm’s length’ approach, which entails the nondeductibility of interestpaid between affiliated companies which is in excess of what would be221