Part 1 - AL-Tax
Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax
Chapter 7to account for the nature of the firm and the difference between risk insuranceand uncertainty safeguards, because it is this that determines the nature of profit.If no direct price comparison is possible, it is this distinction which determineswhether the arm’s length analysis can be based on margin analysis, budget-actualanalysis, or value chain analysis, with allocation of residual profit pies at thenonroutine functions along the value chain.Transaction cost economics as developed by Williamson (1985, 1996, 1998) distinguishesbetween risk and uncertainty in order to measure the degree of entrepreneurship.Risk can be governed by insurance contracts. Such insurance costs can becalculated in terms of insurance premiums and/or other measures. The insurance ofrisk can be group-internal, such as in the course of a sophisticated group risk managementmodel or external in the form of an insurance policy with a third party.Whether it is internal or external is of secondary importance regarding the degree ofentrepreneurship of a given functional unit. However, it is of particular relevanceregarding the arm’s length nature of prices or margins: If a risk is insured internally,the price might be lower compared to a situation where the risk is insured throughan external insurer. The reason lies in the principal-agent structure and the informationabout the true nature of the risk. Likewise, if the risk exposure is not insuredbut borne by the (related) party A, which transfers its good or service to relatedparty B, the price could be smaller than in a comparable situation where the risk iscovered by a third-party insurance contract. Alternatively, risk borne without a damagingoccurrence produces higher profit margins compared to a situation where riskhurts through damage.On the other hand, uncertainty is not governed by means of internal or externalinsurance. Rather, it is coordinated by means of governance structures differentfrom insurance. Examples are certain mechanisms to search for information on thecreditability and/or liability of suppliers, subcontractors, or customers in order toavoid interruptions in the transactional exchange of products and services. Suchmechanisms rarely show the nature of ‘insurance’ rather than ‘governance’. Also,the internal uncertainty of a firm (e.g. the hazard of quality misalignment) might begoverned by certain mechanisms such as quality assurance systems or evenemployee motivation programs. These measures are also costly and, in the languageof transaction cost economics, to a large extent represent transaction costs.Note that such costs are not insurance costs on risk. Alternatively, uncertainty canbe turned into risk if the rate of frequency is sufficiently large.The difference between risk and uncertainty lies in quantification and calculation.Risk can be quantified and calculated, uncertainty cannot. Risk can be insured,uncertainty usually not. Risk is thought to be susceptible to assessment by using a157
International Taxation Handbooklikelihood, uncertainty not. Uncertainty is observed – and, possibly, moderated – bythe coordination skills of the entrepreneur. Hence, the term entrepreneur refers togovernance of new, unknown, and uncertain situations. For example, the task tosearch for new business partners is full of hazards and uncertainty. If the entrepreneuris able to quantify such hazards, it becomes risk. He might insure for that or not.For example, the consequence of failed strategies is damage or even bankruptcy.Because strategies regularly show the features of innovation and novelty,they are performed under uncertainty rather than risk. The accurate level of riskcannot be determined in situations of novelty and also in instances where therewas no occurrence of damage until the present. In such a configuration, the skillsof the entrepreneur ensure that the potential for damage does not materialize or,if it does, that it does as little harm as possible.In our model on function and risk analysis for transfer pricing purposes, anentrepreneur takes into account uncertainty in all decision-making issues. Forexample, will the product and marketing strategy be successful? Will services findcustomers? Will the new manufacturing plant abroad function well? Are employeessufficiently trained and motivated? The task of the entrepreneur is to navigatearound such potential hazards of the organization. Partially, inherent uncertaintiescan be assessed ex-ante if a rule of thumb – be it industry- or individual-specific –allows this. Also, the entrepreneur might wish to cover part of that uncertainty bycontracting with an insurer (e.g. liability insurances), notwithstanding the lack ofan exact risk assessment.Theoretically, of course, the entrepreneur could safeguard against all risks anduncertainty. However, this would consume large parts of the profitability, or evenresult in losses, since the insurer would have to provide coverage for risks whichcannot be assessed or are assessed at a very high cost of underwriting. Hence,insurance coverage limits the profits of a company if the damage does not occur.It is this aspect that, among other challenges, makes transfer pricing so crucial interms of comparability of the tested party with similar third parties.In other words, transactions and the respective coordination, if performed forthe first time or very rarely, lack a consistent body of rules of thumb and experience.Transactions of strategy units developing permanent solutions to new problemsmake transfer pricing difficult in large organizations.7.3.3 Intermediary resultsFor the assessment as to whether transfer prices are at arm’s length, it is essential tounderstand the nature of functions performed and risk borne by a certain business158
- Page 127 and 128: International Taxation Handbookat l
- Page 129 and 130: International Taxation Handbookothe
- Page 131 and 132: International Taxation HandbookCash
- Page 133 and 134: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 135 and 136: International Taxation HandbookThis
- Page 137 and 138: International Taxation Handbookas t
- Page 139 and 140: International Taxation Handbookof o
- Page 141 and 142: International Taxation Handbookbetw
- Page 143 and 144: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 145 and 146: International Taxation Handbook6.2.
- Page 147 and 148: International Taxation HandbookThey
- Page 149 and 150: International Taxation Handbookneut
- Page 151 and 152: International Taxation Handbookboun
- Page 153 and 154: International Taxation Handbookof t
- Page 155 and 156: Table 6.2Factors determining the ex
- Page 157 and 158: 136Table 6.2(Continued)Analytical F
- Page 159 and 160: International Taxation Handbook●
- Page 161 and 162: International Taxation Handbookthe
- Page 163 and 164: International Taxation HandbookNote
- Page 165 and 166: International Taxation HandbookErns
- Page 167 and 168: International Taxation HandbookWilk
- Page 169 and 170: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 171 and 172: International Taxation Handbooktest
- Page 173 and 174: International Taxation Handbookleng
- Page 175 and 176: International Taxation Handbook7.2
- Page 177: International Taxation Handbook7.3
- Page 181 and 182: International Taxation Handbook7.4.
- Page 183 and 184: International Taxation HandbookRisk
- Page 185 and 186: International Taxation HandbookDecr
- Page 187 and 188: International Taxation Handbooksuch
- Page 189 and 190: International Taxation Handbook4. T
- Page 191 and 192: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 193 and 194: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 195 and 196: International Taxation HandbookEuro
- Page 197 and 198: International Taxation Handbookhand
- Page 199 and 200: International Taxation Handbook●
- Page 201 and 202: International Taxation Handbook2523
- Page 203 and 204: International Taxation HandbookWild
- Page 205 and 206: International Taxation Handbook8.5.
- Page 207 and 208: International Taxation Handbook43.5
- Page 209 and 210: International Taxation Handbookof a
- Page 211 and 212: International Taxation Handbookbe c
- Page 213 and 214: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 215 and 216: International Taxation Handbookther
- Page 217 and 218: International Taxation Handbookof t
- Page 219 and 220: International Taxation Handbookfor
- Page 221 and 222: International Taxation HandbookNote
- Page 223 and 224: International Taxation HandbookRefe
- Page 225 and 226: International Taxation HandbookEuro
- Page 227 and 228: International Taxation HandbookKind
International <strong>Tax</strong>ation Handbooklikelihood, uncertainty not. Uncertainty is observed – and, possibly, moderated – bythe coordination skills of the entrepreneur. Hence, the term entrepreneur refers togovernance of new, unknown, and uncertain situations. For example, the task tosearch for new business partners is full of hazards and uncertainty. If the entrepreneuris able to quantify such hazards, it becomes risk. He might insure for that or not.For example, the consequence of failed strategies is damage or even bankruptcy.Because strategies regularly show the features of innovation and novelty,they are performed under uncertainty rather than risk. The accurate level of riskcannot be determined in situations of novelty and also in instances where therewas no occurrence of damage until the present. In such a configuration, the skillsof the entrepreneur ensure that the potential for damage does not materialize or,if it does, that it does as little harm as possible.In our model on function and risk analysis for transfer pricing purposes, anentrepreneur takes into account uncertainty in all decision-making issues. Forexample, will the product and marketing strategy be successful? Will services findcustomers? Will the new manufacturing plant abroad function well? Are employeessufficiently trained and motivated? The task of the entrepreneur is to navigatearound such potential hazards of the organization. <strong>Part</strong>ially, inherent uncertaintiescan be assessed ex-ante if a rule of thumb – be it industry- or individual-specific –allows this. Also, the entrepreneur might wish to cover part of that uncertainty bycontracting with an insurer (e.g. liability insurances), notwithstanding the lack ofan exact risk assessment.Theoretically, of course, the entrepreneur could safeguard against all risks anduncertainty. However, this would consume large parts of the profitability, or evenresult in losses, since the insurer would have to provide coverage for risks whichcannot be assessed or are assessed at a very high cost of underwriting. Hence,insurance coverage limits the profits of a company if the damage does not occur.It is this aspect that, among other challenges, makes transfer pricing so crucial interms of comparability of the tested party with similar third parties.In other words, transactions and the respective coordination, if performed forthe first time or very rarely, lack a consistent body of rules of thumb and experience.Transactions of strategy units developing permanent solutions to new problemsmake transfer pricing difficult in large organizations.7.3.3 Intermediary resultsFor the assessment as to whether transfer prices are at arm’s length, it is essential tounderstand the nature of functions performed and risk borne by a certain business158