Part 1 - AL-Tax

Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax

eduart0.tripod.com
from eduart0.tripod.com More from this publisher
12.07.2015 Views

Chapter 7to account for the nature of the firm and the difference between risk insuranceand uncertainty safeguards, because it is this that determines the nature of profit.If no direct price comparison is possible, it is this distinction which determineswhether the arm’s length analysis can be based on margin analysis, budget-actualanalysis, or value chain analysis, with allocation of residual profit pies at thenonroutine functions along the value chain.Transaction cost economics as developed by Williamson (1985, 1996, 1998) distinguishesbetween risk and uncertainty in order to measure the degree of entrepreneurship.Risk can be governed by insurance contracts. Such insurance costs can becalculated in terms of insurance premiums and/or other measures. The insurance ofrisk can be group-internal, such as in the course of a sophisticated group risk managementmodel or external in the form of an insurance policy with a third party.Whether it is internal or external is of secondary importance regarding the degree ofentrepreneurship of a given functional unit. However, it is of particular relevanceregarding the arm’s length nature of prices or margins: If a risk is insured internally,the price might be lower compared to a situation where the risk is insured throughan external insurer. The reason lies in the principal-agent structure and the informationabout the true nature of the risk. Likewise, if the risk exposure is not insuredbut borne by the (related) party A, which transfers its good or service to relatedparty B, the price could be smaller than in a comparable situation where the risk iscovered by a third-party insurance contract. Alternatively, risk borne without a damagingoccurrence produces higher profit margins compared to a situation where riskhurts through damage.On the other hand, uncertainty is not governed by means of internal or externalinsurance. Rather, it is coordinated by means of governance structures differentfrom insurance. Examples are certain mechanisms to search for information on thecreditability and/or liability of suppliers, subcontractors, or customers in order toavoid interruptions in the transactional exchange of products and services. Suchmechanisms rarely show the nature of ‘insurance’ rather than ‘governance’. Also,the internal uncertainty of a firm (e.g. the hazard of quality misalignment) might begoverned by certain mechanisms such as quality assurance systems or evenemployee motivation programs. These measures are also costly and, in the languageof transaction cost economics, to a large extent represent transaction costs.Note that such costs are not insurance costs on risk. Alternatively, uncertainty canbe turned into risk if the rate of frequency is sufficiently large.The difference between risk and uncertainty lies in quantification and calculation.Risk can be quantified and calculated, uncertainty cannot. Risk can be insured,uncertainty usually not. Risk is thought to be susceptible to assessment by using a157

International Taxation Handbooklikelihood, uncertainty not. Uncertainty is observed – and, possibly, moderated – bythe coordination skills of the entrepreneur. Hence, the term entrepreneur refers togovernance of new, unknown, and uncertain situations. For example, the task tosearch for new business partners is full of hazards and uncertainty. If the entrepreneuris able to quantify such hazards, it becomes risk. He might insure for that or not.For example, the consequence of failed strategies is damage or even bankruptcy.Because strategies regularly show the features of innovation and novelty,they are performed under uncertainty rather than risk. The accurate level of riskcannot be determined in situations of novelty and also in instances where therewas no occurrence of damage until the present. In such a configuration, the skillsof the entrepreneur ensure that the potential for damage does not materialize or,if it does, that it does as little harm as possible.In our model on function and risk analysis for transfer pricing purposes, anentrepreneur takes into account uncertainty in all decision-making issues. Forexample, will the product and marketing strategy be successful? Will services findcustomers? Will the new manufacturing plant abroad function well? Are employeessufficiently trained and motivated? The task of the entrepreneur is to navigatearound such potential hazards of the organization. Partially, inherent uncertaintiescan be assessed ex-ante if a rule of thumb – be it industry- or individual-specific –allows this. Also, the entrepreneur might wish to cover part of that uncertainty bycontracting with an insurer (e.g. liability insurances), notwithstanding the lack ofan exact risk assessment.Theoretically, of course, the entrepreneur could safeguard against all risks anduncertainty. However, this would consume large parts of the profitability, or evenresult in losses, since the insurer would have to provide coverage for risks whichcannot be assessed or are assessed at a very high cost of underwriting. Hence,insurance coverage limits the profits of a company if the damage does not occur.It is this aspect that, among other challenges, makes transfer pricing so crucial interms of comparability of the tested party with similar third parties.In other words, transactions and the respective coordination, if performed forthe first time or very rarely, lack a consistent body of rules of thumb and experience.Transactions of strategy units developing permanent solutions to new problemsmake transfer pricing difficult in large organizations.7.3.3 Intermediary resultsFor the assessment as to whether transfer prices are at arm’s length, it is essential tounderstand the nature of functions performed and risk borne by a certain business158

International <strong>Tax</strong>ation Handbooklikelihood, uncertainty not. Uncertainty is observed – and, possibly, moderated – bythe coordination skills of the entrepreneur. Hence, the term entrepreneur refers togovernance of new, unknown, and uncertain situations. For example, the task tosearch for new business partners is full of hazards and uncertainty. If the entrepreneuris able to quantify such hazards, it becomes risk. He might insure for that or not.For example, the consequence of failed strategies is damage or even bankruptcy.Because strategies regularly show the features of innovation and novelty,they are performed under uncertainty rather than risk. The accurate level of riskcannot be determined in situations of novelty and also in instances where therewas no occurrence of damage until the present. In such a configuration, the skillsof the entrepreneur ensure that the potential for damage does not materialize or,if it does, that it does as little harm as possible.In our model on function and risk analysis for transfer pricing purposes, anentrepreneur takes into account uncertainty in all decision-making issues. Forexample, will the product and marketing strategy be successful? Will services findcustomers? Will the new manufacturing plant abroad function well? Are employeessufficiently trained and motivated? The task of the entrepreneur is to navigatearound such potential hazards of the organization. <strong>Part</strong>ially, inherent uncertaintiescan be assessed ex-ante if a rule of thumb – be it industry- or individual-specific –allows this. Also, the entrepreneur might wish to cover part of that uncertainty bycontracting with an insurer (e.g. liability insurances), notwithstanding the lack ofan exact risk assessment.Theoretically, of course, the entrepreneur could safeguard against all risks anduncertainty. However, this would consume large parts of the profitability, or evenresult in losses, since the insurer would have to provide coverage for risks whichcannot be assessed or are assessed at a very high cost of underwriting. Hence,insurance coverage limits the profits of a company if the damage does not occur.It is this aspect that, among other challenges, makes transfer pricing so crucial interms of comparability of the tested party with similar third parties.In other words, transactions and the respective coordination, if performed forthe first time or very rarely, lack a consistent body of rules of thumb and experience.Transactions of strategy units developing permanent solutions to new problemsmake transfer pricing difficult in large organizations.7.3.3 Intermediary resultsFor the assessment as to whether transfer prices are at arm’s length, it is essential tounderstand the nature of functions performed and risk borne by a certain business158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!