Part 1 - AL-Tax
Part 1 - AL-Tax Part 1 - AL-Tax
income taxation tax authorities’ taxation for the taxpayer’s correctnessprocessof self-assessmentType of Request versus ‘Request’ for APA process ‘Application’ for APA Moreapplication application process market-likeActorsTaxpayer Experience of Level of preference and New methodology of Higher level of knowledge Yesthe taxpayer experience with APA reducing tax risk for and know-how due toprocesses selected transactions ‘experience’ and ‘expertise’Tax Experience Dedicated APA resources Low level of experience The APA Program explicitly Yesadministration of tax such as APA personnel, with advance ruling in the dealing with APAsadministration resources, procedures area of ‘transfer pricing’ The APA unit within theNo specialized APA federal tax administrationProgram and unit with with dedicated tax expertsdedicated tax experts and and economistseconomistsTax consultant Experience of Average number of APA Small number of cases Large number of cases Yestax consultant cases per transfer pricing No specialized APA Specialized APA consultancyconsultant consultancy within the ‘Big Four’ taxconsulting firmsOECD Impact from Acceptance/Incorporation Yes; Partly; Yesinternational of international regime Vice versa, Germany Vice versa, USA significantlyorganization principles by national tax partly has impact on influences OECD positionsadministration OECD on transfer pricingguidelines137a In Germany, the upcoming constitutional reform of the federal system of legislative approval by the second chamber (Bundesrat) may bring in changes inlegislative and executive authority in the field of tax assessment and tax revenue redistribution.
International Taxation Handbook●●(Bundesländer) of the Federal Republic of Germany preventing the currentfederal tax administration, including the Federal Ministry of Finance, tolaunch a fully fledged APA program similar to that in the USA.❍ Tax courts and the judicial role in institutionalizing transfer pricing provisionsmay also impact the evolution of APA programs. However, the analysiscould not identify clear information on this factor. Yet, both in the USAand in Germany, highest court decisions and regional court decisions ontransfer pricing cases have increased the awareness among the parties totreat controversial issues ex-ante through an APA.Institutional frameworks to generate an APA as if an APA program or similarmechanisms are already in place:❍ The legal title of an APA means the tax authority is obliged to accept andprocess an APA request and this may be part of its relative attractiveness.In some countries (for example, the USA), the taxpayer is entitled toclaim an APA, while in other countries the taxpayer may have no suchlegitimate title.❍ The legal nature of an APA is relevant for cross-country comparisons. InAnglo-American countries, an APA is normally a contract, while underRoman-Law principles the taxpayer receives a legal statement from thetax administration. Another important factor is the ‘distorted legal enforceability’power. For example, in Germany, most important tax cases intransfer pricing were finally won by the taxpayer (for example, the seminalFederal Tax Court decision on transfer pricing documentation dated17 October 2001).Economic factors describe the conditions under which an APA is an attractivemechanism to govern the tax base allocation problems behind transferpricing:❍ Without ‘economic demand’ for APAs, such nonadversarial mechanismsmay not be the most attractive method to resolve transfer pricing cases.There are several upfront costs associated with an APA process – comparedwith a large, but unknown, range of ex-post cost possibilities because ofaudit and income adjustments. Economic demand might be measured bythe share of cross-border business within multinational groups – measuredas business between two countries – to total cross-border business betweenthese two countries.❍ The industry the MNC’s transfer pricing case belongs to seems to play arole in relative attractiveness of an APA. As is often the case in high-techbusiness or in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, related-party138
- Page 107 and 108: International Taxation Handbook4.5
- Page 109 and 110: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 111 and 112: International Taxation HandbookHube
- Page 113 and 114: International Taxation HandbookTedi
- Page 115 and 116: International Taxation HandbookIt i
- Page 117 and 118: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 119 and 120: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 121 and 122: International Taxation Handbookregu
- Page 123 and 124: International Taxation Handbookterm
- Page 125 and 126: International Taxation Handbooktake
- Page 127 and 128: International Taxation Handbookat l
- Page 129 and 130: International Taxation Handbookothe
- Page 131 and 132: International Taxation HandbookCash
- Page 133 and 134: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 135 and 136: International Taxation HandbookThis
- Page 137 and 138: International Taxation Handbookas t
- Page 139 and 140: International Taxation Handbookof o
- Page 141 and 142: International Taxation Handbookbetw
- Page 143 and 144: International Taxation HandbookThe
- Page 145 and 146: International Taxation Handbook6.2.
- Page 147 and 148: International Taxation HandbookThey
- Page 149 and 150: International Taxation Handbookneut
- Page 151 and 152: International Taxation Handbookboun
- Page 153 and 154: International Taxation Handbookof t
- Page 155 and 156: Table 6.2Factors determining the ex
- Page 157: 136Table 6.2(Continued)Analytical F
- Page 161 and 162: International Taxation Handbookthe
- Page 163 and 164: International Taxation HandbookNote
- Page 165 and 166: International Taxation HandbookErns
- Page 167 and 168: International Taxation HandbookWilk
- Page 169 and 170: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 171 and 172: International Taxation Handbooktest
- Page 173 and 174: International Taxation Handbookleng
- Page 175 and 176: International Taxation Handbook7.2
- Page 177 and 178: International Taxation Handbook7.3
- Page 179 and 180: International Taxation Handbooklike
- Page 181 and 182: International Taxation Handbook7.4.
- Page 183 and 184: International Taxation HandbookRisk
- Page 185 and 186: International Taxation HandbookDecr
- Page 187 and 188: International Taxation Handbooksuch
- Page 189 and 190: International Taxation Handbook4. T
- Page 191 and 192: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 193 and 194: This page intentionally left blank
- Page 195 and 196: International Taxation HandbookEuro
- Page 197 and 198: International Taxation Handbookhand
- Page 199 and 200: International Taxation Handbook●
- Page 201 and 202: International Taxation Handbook2523
- Page 203 and 204: International Taxation HandbookWild
- Page 205 and 206: International Taxation Handbook8.5.
- Page 207 and 208: International Taxation Handbook43.5
International <strong>Tax</strong>ation Handbook●●(Bundesländer) of the Federal Republic of Germany preventing the currentfederal tax administration, including the Federal Ministry of Finance, tolaunch a fully fledged APA program similar to that in the USA.❍ <strong>Tax</strong> courts and the judicial role in institutionalizing transfer pricing provisionsmay also impact the evolution of APA programs. However, the analysiscould not identify clear information on this factor. Yet, both in the USAand in Germany, highest court decisions and regional court decisions ontransfer pricing cases have increased the awareness among the parties totreat controversial issues ex-ante through an APA.Institutional frameworks to generate an APA as if an APA program or similarmechanisms are already in place:❍ The legal title of an APA means the tax authority is obliged to accept andprocess an APA request and this may be part of its relative attractiveness.In some countries (for example, the USA), the taxpayer is entitled toclaim an APA, while in other countries the taxpayer may have no suchlegitimate title.❍ The legal nature of an APA is relevant for cross-country comparisons. InAnglo-American countries, an APA is normally a contract, while underRoman-Law principles the taxpayer receives a legal statement from thetax administration. Another important factor is the ‘distorted legal enforceability’power. For example, in Germany, most important tax cases intransfer pricing were finally won by the taxpayer (for example, the seminalFederal <strong>Tax</strong> Court decision on transfer pricing documentation dated17 October 2001).Economic factors describe the conditions under which an APA is an attractivemechanism to govern the tax base allocation problems behind transferpricing:❍ Without ‘economic demand’ for APAs, such nonadversarial mechanismsmay not be the most attractive method to resolve transfer pricing cases.There are several upfront costs associated with an APA process – comparedwith a large, but unknown, range of ex-post cost possibilities because ofaudit and income adjustments. Economic demand might be measured bythe share of cross-border business within multinational groups – measuredas business between two countries – to total cross-border business betweenthese two countries.❍ The industry the MNC’s transfer pricing case belongs to seems to play arole in relative attractiveness of an APA. As is often the case in high-techbusiness or in the chemical and pharmaceutical industries, related-party138